I meant "regulated" today, rather than prevented todayWell regulated, at the time the 2nd was written, meant " in good working order"
It has zip to do with laws.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I meant "regulated" today, rather than prevented todayWell regulated, at the time the 2nd was written, meant " in good working order"
It has zip to do with laws.
Why are they called "arms" ? Mine is as big as yer legIf yes...is the right to carry a knife protected by the Second Amendment?
According to lefties, sticks and stones are considered arms. Just check with the J6 hoaxers what an armed insurrection is.If yes...is the right to carry a knife protected by the Second Amendment?
I meant "regulated" today, rather than prevented today
Tasers are. Guns are. Can't see a rational argument against knives.If yes...is the right to carry a knife protected by the Second Amendment?
It was worded that way only for that time in our history. The future, as we know it, was unimaginable.Yeah, but the 2nd was written for a specific reason. That is why it was worded as carefully as it was. Remember, in colonial America the first artillery unit was PRIVATE.
If yes...is the right to carry a knife protected by the Second Amendment?
It was worded that way only for that time in our history. The future, as we know it, was unimaginable.
Absolutely correct....as it existed. Had they known the horrors of today and gun capacity of today,You are categorically wrong. Any sample reading of the Founders thoughts, as regards the 2nd, is very clear that they meant it for the duration of the country.
Absolutely correct....as it existed. Had they known the horrors of today and gun capacity of today,
who knows what their ruling would be. Get real. Muskets vs. AK47s. There has to be changes in the form of regulations, which is perfectly legal and necessary.
George Washington would have, unquestionably, fully approved of every potential militiaman, and every frontier family, being in possession of an AR15 and a cartridge box full of loaded 30-rd magazines.Absolutely correct....as it existed. Had they known the horrors of today and gun capacity of today,
who knows what their ruling would be. Get real. Muskets vs. AK47s. There has to be changes in the form of regulations, which is perfectly legal and necessary.
George Washington would have, unquestionably, fully approved of every potential militiaman, and every frontier family, being in possession of an AR15 and a cartridge box full of loaded 30-rd magazines.
Change my mind.
Awesome.I carry both.
George Washington ?George Washington would have, unquestionably, fully approved of every potential militiaman, and every frontier family, being in possession of an AR15 and a cartridge box full of loaded 30-rd magazines.
Change my mind.
Ya mean that they invaded our Capitol with sticks and stones?According to lefties, sticks and stones are considered arms. Just check with the J6 hoaxers what an armed insurrection is.
You do not sound very informed. Nobody had any guns at the j6 event other than law enforcement, yet lefties promote the notion that j6 was an armed insurrection.Ya mean that they invaded our Capitol with sticks and stones?
Yes. You know - one of the founders of this countryGeorge Washington ?
Today's weapons are a far cry from the muskets used in Washington's America. Nobody in their right mind would approve of the weaponry that is available to today's gun owners. Unnecessary, for sure.Yes. You know - one of the founders of this country
A person you suggest that, had he "known the horrors of today and gun capacity of today", might heve thought differently about the 2nd.
So...
Change my mind.
...and Nunchucks.So, not just knives but also swords, battle axes, maybe a mace or a halberd.
Also, an American expressing his personal, subjective opinion – and as already correctly noted, an opinion that is meaningless, completely devoid of legal, Constitutional merit.Yes. You know - one of the founders of this country
A person you suggest that, had he "known the horrors of today and gun capacity of today", might heve thought differently about the 2nd.
So...
Change my mind.