Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 64,961
- 59,100
- 3,600
They are going to be exposed. Caught again and this lie is a huge one. People are going to lose their seats in Cngress by the time this is finished. Let's get this in court.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where does it say the offense must be specified?A pardon is the use of executive power that exempts the individual to whom it was given from punishment. The president’s pardon power is based on Article II of the Constitution which says, “…he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.
What offenses were Biden's pardons forgiving for those who had no crime stated against them? What punishment is being exempted for those who were not being punished to begin with?
Where does it say the offense must be specified?
The pardon doesn’t cover that sort of thing and you know it.so if Fauci commits murder next week he can't be tried because of senile joe's pardon? do you understand how stupid your position is on this?
Here’s the offense!It implies there must be an offence and a punishment to be pardoned from to begin with. Duh.
Provided already, Trollwinger.Still waiting for a credible link
Because they were there previously and asked Trump to add another lock to the room, which he did, Moroner.It's not obvious at all. In fact, it defies logic. How could have they known what was in the basement of Mar a Lago before searching it?
You don't "feel" like continuing because you know where this goes. You can't defend your assertion so you need to run away. You're too indoctrinated to ever admit your own bullshit.
Yes, lock the room because they considered it a crime scene. They were not allowed to search for any documents that Trump was hiding in there.Because they were there previously and asked Trump to add another lock to the room, which he did, Moroner.
Anonymous Jack Smith hack Sez……Yes, lock the room because they considered it a crime scene. They were not allowed to search for any documents that Trump was hiding in there.
The door “protecting” the classified military secrets could be opened with a coat hanger.
![]()
A 'coat hanger' could unlock Mar-a-Lago storage room where Trump stored classified docs: Witness
The witness account further undercuts claims by Trump that the highly-classified materials were secured at all times.abcnews.go.com
At least I have a source. You have nothing.Anonymous Jack Smith hack Sez……![]()
![]()
![]()
Are Biden's issuance of presidential pardons going too far?
Biden would have been remiss in his duty to protect the citizens of the United States, if he allowed people who were merely doing their duty to face a psycho promising retribution. That’s not justice; it’s revenge.Well sure. Biden's pardons are extraordinary, beyond the pale, no president has ever done this before. None of these people stand convicted, not even charged with a thing. But if any of them had been charged already, they could have plead the Fifth under oath to protect the presumption of innocence and avoid criminal liability, but if the witness has already received a pardon as Biden has done, they can no longer set up this privilege since with a pardon, the offense stands as if it had never been committed, so, how can you plead the 5th when there is no criminal liability to protect yourself from? So now you must answer the questions. Ooops.
But pardoning someone of something before they are even charged to protect them implies there is something they are guilty of needing protection from.
Further, there may be several legal mechanisms to get around these pardons: the case can be made that Biden was incompetent and unfit for office therefore, unable to make these decisions making them legally null and void.
Either way, none of these pardoned people are out of hot water and may yet indeed be called in and charged and questioned leaving it up to them to try to use these pardons as their defense, giving opportunity to test them in court.
a pre-emptive pardon says the person pardoned cannot be prosecuted for any crimes within the time parameters of the pardon. Fauci's goes back to 2014 up to the date of the pardon (jan 20, 2025) So if he is found to have committed murder during that time span he is deemed innocent by Biden's pardon. Sorry, but it is you who does not understand how this works. The legality of pre-emptive pardons will probably be challenged in some court and will probably go to the SC for resolution. I suspect that they will be ruled unconstitutional, but we shall see.The pardon doesn’t cover that sort of thing and you know it.
If pardons are only for things that have already happened, we can take that to mean Biden's crime family was pardoned for crimes they already committed.Pardons are only for things that have already happened. That includes murder, obviously.
his pardons were basically an admission of guilt.If pardons are only for things that have already happened, we can take that to mean Biden's crime family was pardoned for crimes they already committed.
So Fauci's duty was to release a terrible virus and an ineffective vaccine on the citizens of the USA? is that your position?Biden would have been remiss in his duty to protect the citizens of the United States, if he allowed people who were merely doing their duty to face a psycho promising retribution. That’s not justice; it’s revenge.
You can have that opinion, but it’s not a fact.If pardons are only for things that have already happened, we can take that to mean Biden's crime family was pardoned for crimes they already committed.
I was commenting on your insistence that. "Pardons are only for things that have already happened. That includes murder, obviously."You can have that opinion, but it’s not a fact.
Those things are whatever prosecutors attempt to charge.I was commenting on your insistence that. "Pardons are only for things that have already happened. That includes murder, obviously."
It appears you need to backtrack on what you posted. The Biden pardons for his crime family shield them from "things that have already happened".
What are those "things"?
Your comment made no reference to pardons applying to future crimes, only that they apply to crimes already committed by the Biden Crime Family.Those things are whatever prosecutors attempt to charge.
My comment was only to say that pardons can’t go into the future.