Are all of Biden’s pardons that were autopenned signed INVALID?

[Marener]

And those who pay moderate attention are not only aware of it, but understand that there obviously were actions undertaken that would get people in big trouble without Quid Pro's intervention.

What he's done is open the door for an incoming president to issue a bunch of pre-emptive pardons to cover his entire administration from prosecution for actions they do during the term. Let's see how blase the usual suspects are should TRUMP! do that.

Trump never needed permission to pardon his cronies before. Wasn’t Trump admitting his administration and campaign were full of criminals by pardoning them?

 

[Blisterfinger]

Nope. The fact prove it isn’t a lie. MAGA was full of criminals and still is.

Intelligent people know that this isn't true. Maga is trying to restore the rule of law in America. Didn't Joe allow millions of illegal aliens invade our country? Aren't you the ones who vandalize legitimate businesses in the name of your fascist leaders? Sure looks like it

Why would I know why Biden said something that I don’t even know he said?

Biden's doj appointed Jack Smith illegally to go after Trump. Just a small example of the persecution that was real. The election that we just had is the referendum that proves my point fascist.

 

[hadit]

Trump never needed permission to pardon his cronies before. Wasn’t Trump admitting his administration and campaign were full of criminals by pardoning them?

Everyone understands that a pardon is supposed to be granted AFTER guilt of a crime is established and the defendant is ready to serve out his/her sentence. It is NOT supposed to be blanket immunity from prosecution because reasons and feelz, the way Quid Pro Joe did it.

 

[Modern Messiah]

Show us where it says all that.

Says all what?
If you are innocent then you need no pardon.
This is quite an elementary concept.
I'm not sure why you're struggling with it.
The most important question is why did old tater head grant pardons to jan unsellect committee, fauci, hunter, his family and schiff?
Can you answer the question or are we just going to get more deflection.

 

[Modern Messiah]

They're being pardoned for any offenses charged in regards to certain criteria - like their work under foreign contracts or investments.

What you are describing is just blanket immunity.
Basically a license to break the law.

 

[Marener]

Everyone understands that a pardon is supposed to be granted AFTER guilt of a crime is established and the defendant is ready to serve out his/her sentence. It is NOT supposed to be blanket immunity from prosecution because reasons and feelz, the way Quid Pro Joe did it.

Trump didn’t have any problem pardoning people who hadn’t been found guilty. Like Steve Bannon.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The weak link in the lib defense is the autopen used to grant the pardons

There is plenty of evidence that biden was not of sound mind

Not in the slightest. Sit down and be quiet, nimrod.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Says all what?
If you are innocent then you need no pardon.
This is quite an elementary concept.
I'm not sure why you're struggling with it.
The most important question is why did old tater head grant pardons to jan unsellect committee, fauci, hunter, his family and schiff?
Can you answer the question or are we just going to get more deflection.

That won't work.,

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

What you are describing is just blanket immunity.
Basically a license to break the law.

Does not matter.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Trump didn’t have any problem pardoning people who hadn’t been found guilty. Like Steve Bannon.

Steve Bannon refused to go before the illegitimate January 6th committee. He was a strong man of principle not playing along with Joe Biden's persecution of political enemies.

 

[Modern Messiah]

That won't work.,

So you can't answer my simple question.
Ok.
Dually noted

 

[hadit]

Trump didn’t have any problem pardoning people who hadn’t been found guilty. Like Steve Bannon.

You seem to be attempting to deflect attention from Quid Pro Joe's actions by complaining about a few loosely related things TRUMP! did.

 

[Marener]

Steve Bannon refused to go before the illegitimate January 6th committee. He was a strong man of principle not playing along with Joe Biden's persecution of political enemies.

Bannon defrauded a charity. What principle is that?

 

[Marener]

You seem to be attempting to deflect attention from Quid Pro Joe's actions by complaining about a few loosely related things TRUMP! did.

Im just pointing out that your statement is incorrect and providing an example to demonstrate it.

I'm not complaining about the pardon of Bannon. I'm merely pointing out that your assertion that "everyone understands..." is false and easily disproven.

 

[hadit]

Im just pointing out that your statement is incorrect and providing an example to demonstrate it.

I'm not complaining about the pardon of Bannon. I'm merely pointing out that your assertion that "everyone understands..." is false and easily disproven.

We understand what a pardon is supposed to be, and that it has become a lot more than its original intention. If you want to quibble about that, be my guest.

 

[Marener]

We understand what a pardon is supposed to be, and that it has become a lot more than its original intention. If you want to quibble about that, be my guest.

So you make shit up and pretend that it's the original intention. That's originalism for you. Total bullshit.

 

[hadit]

So you make shit up and pretend that it's the original intention. That's originalism for you. Total bullshit.

What do YOU think was the original purpose of the presidential pardon? Can you articulate it or are you going by the opposite of what some people say?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

If anyone gets lost in the woods, just start talking about politics really loud.

Modern Messiah will come to argue with him or her.

 

[Marener]

What do YOU think was the original purpose of the presidential pardon? Can you articulate it or are you going by the opposite of what some people say?

There's very little writing from the founders about the pardon power. You're just making shit up about what it was originally intended. They discussed putting more limits on it, but those were all voted down except for the impeachment part.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

There's very little writing from the founders about the pardon power. You're just making shit up about what it was originally intended. They discussed putting more limits on it, but those were all voted down except for the impeachment part.

had it, like most of his ilk, argue without knowing the subject in question.