Arab commentator: When the state of Israel was established, there wasn’t a state of palestine

Oh what was it called

Barren wasteland.
1590004362453.png
 
Between 1922 and 1948 the land was legally and officially under the rule of the British. It was officially called “Palestine” in English. In Arabic it was officially called “Falastin”, and in Hebrew it was officially called “Palestina (E.Y)”.
What was the land of Israel called before 1948? - Quora

It was not a state, it was a section of the Ottoman Empire and its name was Palestine.
 
Between 1922 and 1948 the land was legally and officially under the rule of the British. It was officially called “Palestine” in English. In Arabic it was officially called “Falastin”, and in Hebrew it was officially called “Palestina (E.Y)”.
What was the land of Israel called before 1948? - Quora

Palestine was a European name, not Middle Eastern.

It changed back and forth between the RCC and the Muslims and then it turned into the Holy Roman Empire before it became part of the Ottoman Empire.
 
Between 1922 and 1948 the land was legally and officially under the rule of the British. It was officially called “Palestine” in English. In Arabic it was officially called “Falastin”, and in Hebrew it was officially called “Palestina (E.Y)”.
What was the land of Israel called before 1948? - Quora

Palestine was a European name, not Middle Eastern.

It changed back and forth between the RCC and the Muslims and then it turned into the Holy Roman Empire before it became part of the Ottoman Empire.

Jews’ homeland.
 
Between 1922 and 1948 the land was legally and officially under the rule of the British. It was officially called “Palestine” in English. In Arabic it was officially called “Falastin”, and in Hebrew it was officially called “Palestina (E.Y)”.
What was the land of Israel called before 1948? - Quora

Palestine was a European name, not Middle Eastern.

It changed back and forth between the RCC and the Muslims and then it turned into the Holy Roman Empire before it became part of the Ottoman Empire.

Jews’ homeland.
It was not, but it is now, they share it with the Palestinians. The kinda took it over and ran most of the Palestinians out.
 
Between 1922 and 1948 the land was legally and officially under the rule of the British. It was officially called “Palestine” in English. In Arabic it was officially called “Falastin”, and in Hebrew it was officially called “Palestina (E.Y)”.
What was the land of Israel called before 1948? - Quora

Palestine was a European name, not Middle Eastern.

It changed back and forth between the RCC and the Muslims and then it turned into the Holy Roman Empire before it became part of the Ottoman Empire.

Jews’ homeland.
It was not, but it is now, they share it with the Palestinians. The kinda took it over and ran most of the Palestinians out.

Israel is Jews’ homeland, dating back 3,000+ years. Arabs’ homeland is Arabia. Grade school-level knowledge.
 

No it was not. What was it called??

Another stupid remark from the Holocaust denier. Do you know who owns us? It's the Chinese!!!! It has been going on for YEARS


A SMALL list. They also own a great deal of REAL ESTATE. Doesn't this stupid DEMOCRAP know this isn't the right forum?????





:ahole-1:
 
Last edited:
Between 1922 and 1948 the land was legally and officially under the rule of the British. It was officially called “Palestine” in English. In Arabic it was officially called “Falastin”, and in Hebrew it was officially called “Palestina (E.Y)”.
What was the land of Israel called before 1948? - Quora

Palestine was a European name, not Middle Eastern.

It changed back and forth between the RCC and the Muslims and then it turned into the Holy Roman Empire before it became part of the Ottoman Empire.

Jews’ homeland.
It was not, but it is now, they share it with the Palestinians. The kinda took it over and ran most of the Palestinians out.

Judaism didn't originate in the ME ?

:auiqs.jpg:
 
MartyNYC writes:
Israel is Jews’ homeland, dating back 3,000+ years. Arabs’ homeland is Arabia. Grade school-level knowledge.

It is sad that some Israelis and Zionists resort to childish arguments to defend their state. It’s not as if most of us have no knowledge of the old Bible stories, of Abraham’s birth in Mesopotamia, of Egypt & Moses & the Exodus, of the wondering in the desert, of the wars with native Canaanite tribes, of tiny ancient Israel and its short-lived “glory” under a few otherwise inconsequential “Kings.“ Enough already.

Who doesn’t know that there was no independent Arab Palestinian state before 1948? Why is it that for many Zionists somehow it’s not sufficient to tell the tragic story of Jews seeking a homeland, a refuge, a state of their own, of escaping European persecution and the Nazis, falling as if from a burning building on top of others living in Palestine — their own ancient homeland that they call “Eretz Yisrael”? Is that not a good enough story? Not moving and tragic enough? Why do they have to try to disappear the “Palestinians“ entirely?
 
Last edited:
Between 1922 and 1948 the land was legally and officially under the rule of the British. It was officially called “Palestine” in English. In Arabic it was officially called “Falastin”, and in Hebrew it was officially called “Palestina (E.Y)”.
What was the land of Israel called before 1948? - Quora

Palestine was a European name, not Middle Eastern.

It changed back and forth between the RCC and the Muslims and then it turned into the Holy Roman Empire before it became part of the Ottoman Empire.

Jews’ homeland.
It was not, but it is now, they share it with the Palestinians. The kinda took it over and ran most of the Palestinians out.

Judaism didn't originate in the ME ?

:auiqs.jpg:

Between 1922 and 1948 the land was legally and officially under the rule of the British. It was officially called “Palestine” in English. In Arabic it was officially called “Falastin”, and in Hebrew it was officially called “Palestina (E.Y)”.
What was the land of Israel called before 1948? - Quora

Palestine was a European name, not Middle Eastern.

It changed back and forth between the RCC and the Muslims and then it turned into the Holy Roman Empire before it became part of the Ottoman Empire.

Jews’ homeland.
It was not, but it is now, they share it with the Palestinians. The kinda took it over and ran most of the Palestinians out.

Judaism didn't originate in the ME ?

:auiqs.jpg:
MartyNYC writes:
Israel is Jews’ homeland, dating back 3,000+ years. Arabs’ homeland is Arabia. Grade school-level knowledge.

It is sad that some Israelis and Zionists resort to childish arguments to defend their state. It’s not as if most of us have no knowledge of the old Bible stories, of Abraham’s birth in Mesopotamia, of Egypt & Moses & the Exodus, of the wondering in the desert, of the wars with native Canaanite tribes, of tiny ancient Israel and its short-lived “glory” under a few otherwise inconsequential “Kings.“ Enough already.

Who doesn’t know that there was no independent Arab Palestinian state before 1948? Why is it that for many Zionists somehow it’s not sufficient to tell the tragic story of Jews seeking a homeland, a refuge, a state of their own, of escaping European persecution and the Nazis, falling as if from a burning building on top of others living in Palestine — their own ancient homeland that they call “Eretz Yisrael”? Is that not a good enough story? Not moving and tragic enough? Why do they have to try to disappear the “Palestinians“ entirely?

Israelites, ancestors of Jews, were Canaanites, according to scholars. Hebrew was a Canaanite dialect. El, as in Elohim and Israel, was a Canaanite god. Canaan was destroyed in the late Bronze Age, replaced by Israel and Phoenicia and Philistines on the Mediterranean coast. Phoenicians and Philistines are long-extinct.
 
MartyNYC writes:
Israel is Jews’ homeland, dating back 3,000+ years. Arabs’ homeland is Arabia. Grade school-level knowledge.

It is sad that some Israelis and Zionists resort to childish arguments to defend their state. It’s not as if most of us have no knowledge of the old Bible stories, of Abraham’s birth in Mesopotamia, of Egypt & Moses & the Exodus, of the wondering in the desert, of the wars with native Canaanite tribes, of tiny ancient Israel and its short-lived “glory” under a few otherwise inconsequential “Kings.“ Enough already.

Who doesn’t know that there was no independent Arab Palestinian state before 1948? Why is it that for many Zionists somehow it’s not sufficient to tell the tragic story of Jews seeking a homeland, a refuge, a state of their own, of escaping European persecution and the Nazis, falling as if from a burning building on top of others living in Palestine — their own ancient homeland that they call “Eretz Yisrael”? Is that not a good enough story? Not moving and tragic enough? Why do they have to try to disappear the “Palestinians“ entirely?

Never been any palestinians—It was a name designating Jews in the British Mandate. There is no distinct palestinian language, no distinct palestinian religion, no distinct palestinian culture, no palestinian historical identity.

As for Israel, Jesus is called King of Israel and traveled through the land of Israel in the NT.
 
Between 1922 and 1948 the land was legally and officially under the rule of the British. It was officially called “Palestine” in English. In Arabic it was officially called “Falastin”, and in Hebrew it was officially called “Palestina (E.Y)”.
What was the land of Israel called before 1948? - Quora

It was not a state, it was a section of the Ottoman Empire and its name was Palestine.

Actually, you would find that it was called Trans-Jordan.
 
All MartyNYC is interested in doing is repeating Zionist talking points. In this case he talks about how the Palestinians were not really a people, did not have a state, but Jews had “a homeland, dating back 3,000/years.” As if all that made the suffering of Palestinians any less tragic. This way of discussing history is obviously self-serving. It is twisting history to serve political ends.

If MartyNYC wants to talk about Jewish myths and Old Testament “history” he should do that. If he wants to talk about Canaanites and archeological research about ancient Hebrews he can do that. If he wants to talk about the Jewish Diaspora and Zionist history, he can do that. But he wants to mix it all up.

According to the Bible myths, Abraham was not a Canaanite and God “gave” the land of the Canaanites to (some of) Abraham’s descendants. The same tribal God also supposedly “gave” Moses the Ten Commandments, which so resembles the Code of King Hammurabi, who actually ruled in Mesopotamia and who preceded any conceivable Moses figure by hundreds of years. Now I don’t mind discussing any of these subjects — they are all interesting in their own ways — but I don’t like discussing them just to serve modern political interests. That’s what uneducated people do. It leads to the same old boring discussions and is necessarily dishonest.

Code of Hammurabi - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:
Between 1922 and 1948 the land was legally and officially under the rule of the British. It was officially called “Palestine” in English. In Arabic it was officially called “Falastin”, and in Hebrew it was officially called “Palestina (E.Y)”.
Wha

It changed back and forth between the RCC and the Muslims and then it turned into the Holy Roman Empire before it became part of the Ottoman Empire.
All MartyNYC is interested in doing is repeating Zionist talking points. In this case he talks about how the Palestinians were not really a people, did not have a state, but Jews had “a homeland, dating back 3,000/years.” As if all that made the suffering of Palestinians any less tragic. This way of discussing history is obviously self-serving. It is twisting history to serve political ends.

If MartyNYC wants to talk about Jewish myths and Old Testament “history” he should do that. If he wants to talk about Canaanites and archeological research about ancient Hebrews he can do that. If he wants to talk about the Jewish Diaspora and Zionist history, he can do that. But he wants to mix it all up.

According to the Bible myths, Abraham was not a Canaanite and God “gave” the land of the Canaanites to (some of) Abraham’s descendants. The same tribal God also supposedly “gave” Moses the Ten Commandments, which so resembles the Code of King Hammurabi, who actually ruled in Mesopotamia and who preceded any conceivable Moses figure by hundreds of years. Now I don’t mind discussing any of these subjects — they are all interesting in their own ways — but I don’t like discussing them just to serve modern political interests. That’s what uneducated people do. It leads to the same old boring discussions and is necessarily dishonest.

Code of Hammurabi - Wikipedia

Pay attention: Bible was not written as a historical record. As I stated previously, Israelites were Canaanites, according to archaeologists and scholars. Israelites later became known as Jews, Yehudim, after their return to Judah, Yehudah, having been liberated from Babylonian exile in the 6th century BCE by Persian King Cyrus, recorded in the Cyrus Cylinder. Jesus, Jesus’s family, 12 Apostles including Peter, and Paul, and Jesus’s followers were Jews. Judaism was a precursor to Christianity, which began as a Jewish sect. Ancient Greeks and Romans called Jews’ country Judea; Persians called it Yehud.

The words palestine and palestinian are European, not Middle Eastern. Palestine was Britain’s nickname for the British Mandate, adopted from the Roman/Latin name palaestina imposed on Jews, referring to Jews’ ancient Philistine enemies who were Greek. Latin-speaking European Christians adopted Roman palaestina and anglicized it into palestine. Britain called the British Mandate “palestine,” which led to Israeli statehood. Jews were called ”palestinians.“ Prior to the Mandate, in 400 years of the Ottoman Empire, there was no political entity called palestine, nor were there any people called palestinians.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top