AR-15 bullet "has so much energy that it can disintegrate 3 inches of leg bone. It would just turn it to dust” -Donald Jenkins, trauma surgeon @UTexas

[Blues Man]

Charles Whitman killed 11 and wounded 31 in 96 minutes from the tower at the University of Texas using a bolt action rifle. Stephen Paddock killed 60 and wounded 411 in 10 minutes in Vegas using an AR-15. Any questions about why they need to be banned?

What an AR-15 Can Do to the Human Body

When a patient is shot by an AR-15, it "looks like a grenade went off in there."

www.wired.com

And?

A shotgun will take the leg right off.

 

[Markle]

And?

A shotgun will take the leg right off.

Depending.

 

[basquebromance]

One of these is an M4, and the other is an AR-15. One of them is the standard issue rifle for our military. The other you can buy in most states for about $800. Only the M4 is fully automatic. Otherwise, they are identical. Enough is enough. Ban these weapons!

 

[basquebromance]

In the time it takes you to read this post, a semi-automatic weapon with a bump stock can fire more than 100 shots.

 

[progressive hunter]

In the time it takes you to read this post, a semi-automatic weapon with a bump stock can fire more than 100 shots.

gotta love that,,

 

[basquebromance]

gotta love that,,

sick

 

[progressive hunter]

sick

yes you are,, but then again thats normal for fascist pricks like you,,

 

[basquebromance]

yes you are,, but then again thats normal for fascist pricks like you,,

the truth hurts. i apologize for hurting your emotions

 

[progressive hunter]

the truth hurts. i apologize for hurting your emotions

what truth did you state??

 

[basquebromance]

what truth did you state??

 

[progressive hunter]

thats an outright lie there,,,

 

[toobfreak]

AR-15 bullet "has so much energy that it can disintegrate 3 inches of leg bone.​

"So much energy?" It's a rifle bullet. If it had any less energy, it would be fairly worthless. I guess you just don't understand that the real damage in any firearm isn't the tearing of the bullet really or even the loss of blood---- the real, primary power for a firearm to damage tissue comes from the hydrostatic shock of the impact.

Charles Whitman killed 11 and wounded 31 in 96 minutes from the tower at the University of Texas using a bolt action rifle. Stephen Paddock killed 60 and wounded 411 in 10 minutes in Vegas using an AR-15. Any questions about why they need to be banned?

Yeah. Cars kill millions, cellphones kill thousands, doctors kill score of people, yet we aren't banning them. The problem isn't the firearm, it is the kind of people this leftwing, progressive society is turning out the past generation who are doing all of the killing! The problem is we need to heal society back to what it used to be when kids were taught about God, guts and guns, so that they value human life again. Instead, the left are subverting them into hating America, thinking patriotism is some kind of radical idea, that God is dead, and that their gender is just a matter of opinion or POV and you wonder why they are bringing guns into the classroom?!

 

[woodwork201]

One of these is an M4, and the other is an AR-15. One of them is the standard issue rifle for our military. The other you can buy in most states for about $800. Only the M4 is fully automatic. Otherwise, they are identical. Enough is enough. Ban these weapons!

They all look alike to you, huh? Hoplophobe.

 

[Blues Man]

In the time it takes you to read this post, a semi-automatic weapon with a bump stock can fire more than 100 shots.

SO what?

 

[Blues Man]

One of these is an M4, and the other is an AR-15. One of them is the standard issue rifle for our military. The other you can buy in most states for about $800. Only the M4 is fully automatic. Otherwise, they are identical. Enough is enough. Ban these weapons!

This gun shoots the same round at the same rate of fire with the same accuracy as an AR 15 but you don't want to ban it

 

[Markle]

In the time it takes you to read this post, a semi-automatic weapon with a bump stock can fire more than 100 shots.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

So, next will be the 338 lapua, then the 7mm.08, then the .308, then.....

At what point do we have a right and who gets to decide?

This is a lie and fails as a slippery slope fallacy – typical of the dishonest right.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

This thread demonstrates a serious lack of understanding.

ALL firearms are deadly. ALL firearms can be used to kill humans.

“All guns are deadly” is disingenuous and misleading.

Not all guns are equal in their efficiency to kill.

This is another lie in an attempt to minimize the deadliness of assault weapons, another failed ‘argument’ against banning assault weapons.

Conservatives need to stop with the lies and dishonesty – assault weapons should not be banned because it’s bad governance and poor public policy, more government excess and overreach.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

It's been a long, boring, pointless discussion on the ballistics of the .223/5.56. Mostly you lie and listen to every rumor you hear. But the point is, who cares? If you don't want shot with my AR-15 don't come in my house uninvited.

Your school shooting posts are pointless because more school shooting deaths have been by other than AR-15s. The gun model doesn't matter when a shooter gets into a room with a bunch of unarmed children, unarmed teachers, unarmed administrators, and coward cops.

Seems like you'd be going after the 9mm that blows your lungs out of your body, as I hear it from Biden.

Another lie from the dishonest right.

No one is ‘going after’ semi-auto pistols, regardless the caliber.

What’s boring is the right’s incessant lying about guns being ‘banned’ and ‘confiscated.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

This is a lie and fails as a slippery slope fallacy – typical of the dishonest right.

You're a dumbfuck. Identifying the fallacy is only a way to identify a potential weakness in an argument. It's not a rebuttal.

It's like diagnosing a disease and claiming the diagnosis is the cure.

Dumbfuck.