martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 94,381
- 44,633
- 2,300
By 2028, the economy will be in such a mess none of those guys will be able to get elected.
Again, this is as good as your prediction for this election?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
By 2028, the economy will be in such a mess none of those guys will be able to get elected.
What could he have done to lower that number? Lockdown the entire country for months on end?
Because of COVID lockdowns.
Because of Dems fanning the flames over George Floyd
Europe is dying, I can give two shits about what China thinks of us.
Wow, what could have lowered that number? Maybe doing what every other industrialized nation did- effective lockdowns, not fighting over masks and vaccines, social distancing. Japan only had 50,000 Covid deaths because they DID lock down the country for months until protocols could be put into place.
Yes, Trump fucked up covid response, causing an already weak economy to go into recession. Here's the dirty little secret, we were heading into recession before Covid ever hit GDP shrank by 5% in Q1 of 2020 before there were any Covid deaths. The biggest contributor was his tariffs on China fouling up supply chains.
No one had to fan the flames over Geo. Floyd. That was outrageous and even white people were upset about it.
America will die faster than Europe does. I don't give this country a generation before it breaks up into smaller countries.
The Japanese were already complaint and germ obsessed.
You would have wanted Trump to send the Army and the Guard to enforce hard lockdowns? That's what it would have taken, I DOUBT you would have supported that.
The COVID response was mostly the responsivity of the States, that's how our system works.
And years later the defund the police bullshit came back to bite you in the ass.
That would be a great thing to write on your tombstone- "That's how the system works!"
If Trump had called for lockdowns, who would have opposed him? Not the Democrats, they wanted lockdowns because Democrats understand Science.
you think the Coward Republicans would have opposed him?
Not really. You are reading too much about this; it is barely a majority win. Trump won less of the popular vote than Biden, Obama either time, Dubya the second time, or Bush or Reagan.
In fact, the only thing he improved on was his own dismal showings. Because America was too racist and misogynistic to get out of its own way.
Whne the dems lose its always race or gender. That broken record won't play anymore.That would be a great thing to write on your tombstone- "That's how the system works!"
If Trump had called for lockdowns, who would have opposed him? Not the Democrats, they wanted lockdowns because Democrats understand Science.
you think the Coward Republicans would have opposed him?
Not really. You are reading too much about this; it is barely a majority win. Trump won less of the popular vote than Biden, Obama either time, Dubya the second time, or Bush or Reagan.
In fact, the only thing he improved on was his own dismal showings. Because America was too racist and misogynistic to get out of its own way.
Whne the dems lose its always race or gender. That broken record won't play anymore.
LOLYou mean when you actually played on racism and misogyny to win?
In two years, you will all be denying you ever supported this fool.
Because he gaslit you into believing you were robbed.We didn't stop after 2020, why would we stop now?
Because he gaslit you into believing you were robbed.
I still think there was fraud, but of course things like that are hard to prove in a system with anonymous ballots, and fraud benefiting areas controlled by the party that probably perpetuated the fraud.
And the typical progressive smugness that anyone that thinks differently than them has to be tricked into it.
Of course you do.
Because you are gullible and incapable of analytical thinking.
a free election by making it harder for people to vote?Nope, because unlike you I actually care about free elections.
You don't.
a free election by making it harder for people to vote?
Got it!
Hey, maybe we should have an obstacle course with flamethrowers in it to vote, that way we'll get the truly committed.
Except you never proved that had happened.By making sure only valid voters vote. Every illegal vote disenfranchises a legal voter.
Except you never proved that had happened.
I'm sure you would have supported Poll Taxes and Literacy Tests, too.