Appears Trump (and his son) will be vindicated in choosing JD Vance as V.P

What could he have done to lower that number? Lockdown the entire country for months on end?
Because of COVID lockdowns.
Because of Dems fanning the flames over George Floyd
Europe is dying, I can give two shits about what China thinks of us.

Wow, what could have lowered that number? Maybe doing what every other industrialized nation did- effective lockdowns, not fighting over masks and vaccines, social distancing. Japan only had 50,000 Covid deaths because they DID lock down the country for months until protocols could be put into place.

Yes, Trump fucked up covid response, causing an already weak economy to go into recession. Here's the dirty little secret, we were heading into recession before Covid ever hit GDP shrank by 5% in Q1 of 2020 before there were any Covid deaths. The biggest contributor was his tariffs on China fouling up supply chains.

No one had to fan the flames over Geo. Floyd. That was outrageous and even white people were upset about it.

America will die faster than Europe does. I don't give this country a generation before it breaks up into smaller countries.
 
Wow, what could have lowered that number? Maybe doing what every other industrialized nation did- effective lockdowns, not fighting over masks and vaccines, social distancing. Japan only had 50,000 Covid deaths because they DID lock down the country for months until protocols could be put into place.

Yes, Trump fucked up covid response, causing an already weak economy to go into recession. Here's the dirty little secret, we were heading into recession before Covid ever hit GDP shrank by 5% in Q1 of 2020 before there were any Covid deaths. The biggest contributor was his tariffs on China fouling up supply chains.

No one had to fan the flames over Geo. Floyd. That was outrageous and even white people were upset about it.

America will die faster than Europe does. I don't give this country a generation before it breaks up into smaller countries.

The Japanese were already complaint and germ obsessed.

You would have wanted Trump to send the Army and the Guard to enforce hard lockdowns? That's what it would have taken, I DOUBT you would have supported that.

The COVID response was mostly the responsivity of the States, that's how our system works.

And years later the defund the police bullshit came back to bite you in the ass.

Again with the predictions. Take the L, dipshit.
 
The Japanese were already complaint and germ obsessed.

You would have wanted Trump to send the Army and the Guard to enforce hard lockdowns? That's what it would have taken, I DOUBT you would have supported that.

The COVID response was mostly the responsivity of the States, that's how our system works.

That would be a great thing to write on your tombstone- "That's how the system works!"

If Trump had called for lockdowns, who would have opposed him? Not the Democrats, they wanted lockdowns because Democrats understand Science.

you think the Coward Republicans would have opposed him?


And years later the defund the police bullshit came back to bite you in the ass.

Not really. You are reading too much about this; it is barely a majority win. Trump won less of the popular vote than Biden, Obama either time, Dubya the second time, or Bush or Reagan.

In fact, the only thing he improved on was his own dismal showings. Because America was too racist and misogynistic to get out of its own way.
 
JoeB131
That would be a great thing to write on your tombstone- "That's how the system works!"

If Trump had called for lockdowns, who would have opposed him? Not the Democrats, they wanted lockdowns because Democrats understand Science.

you think the Coward Republicans would have opposed him?




Not really. You are reading too much about this; it is barely a majority win. Trump won less of the popular vote than Biden, Obama either time, Dubya the second time, or Bush or Reagan.

In fact, the only thing he improved on was his own dismal showings. Because America was too racist and misogynistic to get out of its own way.

Actually they would have full bore, because it was always about getting Trump.

Your butthurt is amazing, keep it up. Om nom nom nom.
 
Oh gosh. People really need to dig deeper. Vance is Peter Thiel's guy, and apparently many conservatives don't realize that Peter Thiel is bad news. His company contracts with government agencies in architecting a surveillance society. He's part of Bilderberg (a globalist group) and on their steering committee, according to their website. Regardless of how he might try to portray himself, he is not truly liberty-minded, or a true capitalist imo.... In fact, he's in deep with the PTSB. And he seems to be another technocrat, and technocracy is very bad news, but where I think this world is heading.

Vance's connection to Peter Thiel (who will be an influence) alone is enough for me to not support him.


This video is very long, but there's a lot of interesting info here...




Oh my goodness! And I didn't even know he's a transhumanist too. Patrick Wood (who writes and speaks about technocracy, after many years of study) says he's a transhumanist and a technocrat. (Those two movements go together)
 
Last edited:
That would be a great thing to write on your tombstone- "That's how the system works!"

If Trump had called for lockdowns, who would have opposed him? Not the Democrats, they wanted lockdowns because Democrats understand Science.

you think the Coward Republicans would have opposed him?




Not really. You are reading too much about this; it is barely a majority win. Trump won less of the popular vote than Biden, Obama either time, Dubya the second time, or Bush or Reagan.

In fact, the only thing he improved on was his own dismal showings. Because America was too racist and misogynistic to get out of its own way.
Whne the dems lose its always race or gender. That broken record won't play anymore.
 
Because he gaslit you into believing you were robbed.

I still think there was fraud, but of course things like that are hard to prove in a system with anonymous ballots, and fraud benefiting areas controlled by the party that probably perpetuated the fraud.

And the typical progressive smugness that anyone that thinks differently than them has to be tricked into it.
 
I still think there was fraud, but of course things like that are hard to prove in a system with anonymous ballots, and fraud benefiting areas controlled by the party that probably perpetuated the fraud.

And the typical progressive smugness that anyone that thinks differently than them has to be tricked into it.

Of course you do.

Because you are gullible and incapable of analytical thinking.
 
a free election by making it harder for people to vote?

Got it!

Hey, maybe we should have an obstacle course with flamethrowers in it to vote, that way we'll get the truly committed.

By making sure only valid voters vote. Every illegal vote disenfranchises a legal voter.
 
Except you never proved that had happened.

I'm sure you would have supported Poll Taxes and Literacy Tests, too.

We had examples this election, which of course you will deny.

Those are unconstitutional.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom