No. Nor is that was was asked.
Yes, that is exactly what you asked for. Once you refused to go first check those Judge's political affiliation. Its public record.
Notably too, is it fair that the forum maintains an expectation that you are able to explain your own assertions, to make your own word as an adult...good?
It is fair. And it is why I did EXACTLY that, when I told you what powerful info
helped me conclude that the DC Circuit is a Dem-plantation.
ps.....a clue for the cluefull: Being able to back up one's own word is.....well, it is a good thing.
So do it.
I agree, it is a good thing. So, I did it!
----------------------------------------------------
"Multitudes".....no less?
Do tell.
ohhhh no, pal. I'm not falling for the banana in the tailpipe trick. lol
I pass. You wouldn't understand the use of multitudes in this capacity. Nope. Cognitive dissonance behooves you --as according to your posts' archives. lol
You would likely treat it as a way to challenge me or dispute the reality I experienced --AS IF, you were there experiencing it with me.
I'm not sure judges are allowed to state they are Democrats or Republicans.
I never said they did. Did I?
But notably, the three judge panel ....all women .....that made the ruling was comprised of two judges who were nominated (the Congress approved of 'em and confirmed them though)...were by a Democrat President. One by a Republican.
Oh, so they are majority Democrat, like I said. Thank you, for reminding readers that I was correct.
The President nominates and then they go through a vetting and approval ordeal by Congress.
Thank you, for listing some information that was never disputed by me in here/never even discussed in here by me.