Appeals Court : Trump has NO IMMUNITY

[Delldude]

The constitution specifically says that presidents are criminally liable after impeachment and conviction by the senate.

Has nothing to do with the topic at hand.......try again.

 

[Marener]

Has nothing to do with the topic at hand.......try again.

It has a lot to do with the topic since your claim is that the president should never be subject to criminal liability.

The constitution specifically says they are.

The only question is whether an impeachment is necessary to be subject to criminal proceedings.

 

[Delldude]

It has a lot to do with the topic since your claim is that the president should never be subject to criminal liability.

I never said that.................

 

[Marener]

I never said that.................

Sure you did.

The argument is no president should be put in a position of being criminally liable for acts done while performing the duties of their office.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Lower courts often make idiotic decisions, only to be overruled by higher courts.

Lower court decisions stand nearly 100% of the time.

 

[Delldude]

Sure you did.

Nope.............you just reinterpreted it to fit your narrative.

The argument is no president should be put in a position of being criminally liable for acts done while performing the duties of their office.

Hard for you to comprehend, 'eh?

 

[Marener]

Hard for you to comprehend, 'eh?

I guess this depends on what the word “while” refers to. Does it refer to the acts or does it refer to the prosecution?

 

[Delldude]

I guess this depends on what the word “while” refers to. Does it refer to the acts or does it refer to the prosecution?

How about a criminal act performed not in the realm of duties of their office?

Duh

 

[protectionist]

Lower court decisions stand nearly 100% of the time.

Well they won't this time, and I don't see a shred of evidence to support your bold claim.