Appeals court tells Texas it cannot ban books for mentioning ‘butt and fart’

[pknopp]

The slanted version posted
Or the actual story?

Whatever you say.

 

[Sunni Man]

What a state these little nazis are.
Maybe someone should tell them about that first amendment thing ? butt/fart

Slow day back in the UK? tommy boy. ....

 

[Billiejeens]

Whatever you say.

You could just read the story
They bury the story.

 

[pknopp]

You could just read the story
They bury the story.

I read the story.

 

[Billiejeens]

I read the story.

So you know that it wasnt just butt and fart

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

You have spent some time trawling the thread negging my comments but you have no comment yourself, I know you are thick but that could be considered bullying.

.

So report me for being a bully.

.

 

[pknopp]

So you know that it wasnt just butt and fart

No, but books with that were banned. Kinda silly, no?

 

[BULLDOG]

They didn't

So why did the appeals court rule on it?
Who in their right mind could say this silly story is pornography?

 

[theHawk]

Appeals court tells Texas it cannot ban books because it dislikes ideas within

Conservative-dominated court restores books to school libraries in case spurred by titles containing ‘butt’ and ‘fart’

www.theguardian.com

butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart butt/ fart

What a state these little nazis are.

Maybe someone should tell them about that first amendment thing ? butt/fart

Somehow I doubt books are being “banned” at schools because of those words.


Books that show and promote pornographic filth and homosexuality are rightfully being banned from school libraries.

This of course upsets the groomers who want to pervert the minds of children.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Somehow I doubt books are being “banned” at schools because of those words.


Books that show and promote pornographic filth and homosexuality are rightfully being banned from school libraries.

This of course upsets the groomers who want to pervert the minds of children.

.

Of course it wasn't the words "butt' and "fart" that were the objectionable content in the OP's link.

Leftists lie.

.

 

[BULLDOG]

Somehow I doubt books are being “banned” at schools because of those words.


Books that show and promote pornographic filth and homosexuality are rightfully being banned from school libraries.

This of course upsets the groomers who want to pervert the minds of children.

You mean like the Bible, the Dictionary, and Encyclopedias? All three of those have been pulled from library shelves because they met the criteria those religious nutbags set for banning books. I agree that there are some books that aren't appropriate for certain age groups, but religious extremists are the worst ones to make that decision.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Tommy certainly does have his themes involving children.

 

[theHawk]

You mean like the Bible, the Dictionary, and Encyclopedias? All three of those have been pulled from library shelves because they met the criteria those religious nutbags set for banning books. I agree that there are some books that aren't appropriate for certain age groups, but religious extremists are the worst ones to make that decision.

A dictionary doesn’t teach such filth, it simply defines words. Although I am sure there are dictionaries without certain filthy words which would be appropriate for young children.

The Bible does not teach such filth either. In fact quite the opposite, it teaches that such behavior is reprehensible and an abomination, which is the truth.

 

[pknopp]

You mean like the Bible, the Dictionary, and Encyclopedias? All three of those have been pulled from library shelves because they met the criteria those religious nutbags set for banning books. I agree that there are some books that aren't appropriate for certain age groups, but religious extremists are the worst ones to make that decision.

Even if they are not appropriate for certain ages, they shouldn't be banned from libraries.

 

[Anathema]

Maybe someone should tell them about that first amendment thing ?

While I agree those two terms do not meet the definition of pornography on their face, I would far rather see the state ban more items than necessary than to miss things which should be banned.

 

[BULLDOG]

A dictionary doesn’t teach such filth, it simply defines words. Although I am sure there are dictionaries without certain filthy words which would be appropriate for young children.

The Bible does not teach such filth either. In fact quite the opposite, it teaches that such behavior is reprehensible and an abomination, which is the truth.

Texas school district pulls Anne Frank’s diary, Bible from shelves after complaints

A Texas school district has pulled the Bible, an illustrated version of Anne Frank’s diary and about 40 other books from its libraries after the tomes sparked complaints from parents and comm…

nypost.com

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Even if they are not appropriate for certain ages, they shouldn't be banned from libraries.

.

Translation -- "Even though children should not be able to see certain things, they should still be able to see those things."

.

 

[BULLDOG]

.

Translation -- "Even though children should not be able to see certain things, they should still be able to see those things."

.

Your comprehension problems seem to be acting up again.

 

[pknopp]

.

Translation -- "Even though children should not be able to see certain things, they should still be able to see those things."

.

Translation -- you are not capable of caring for your own kids it would seem.

It takes a village?

 

[BackAgain]

Cause it's goofy as hell for a state to try that.

It’s also not accurate reporting.