Appeals Court stops radical left judge tariff decision

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Trump tariffs back on after appeals court slams brakes on trade court’s ban

A federal appeals court put the brakes Thursday on a lower court order that overturned most of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs.

nypost.com

A federal appeals court put the brakes Thursday on a lower court order that overturned most of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs.

A full 11-judge panel on the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit stayed the order by the Manhattan-based Court of International Trade while a White House appeal is heard.

The Court of International Trade had ruled that Trump exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act by imposing a 10% flat duty rate on dozens of countries around the world — as well as 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico and 20% tariffs on China in response to illegal fentanyl trafficking.

Comment:
The Radical Left judges are exceeding their authority.
We have system of checks and balances.
The Democrats are a threat to "democracy".

 

[Rambunctious]

Every time a judge gets overturned it dings their credibility... maybe this and other overruled decisions will stop this neo lawfare shit...

 

[meaner gene]

Trump tariffs back on after appeals court slams brakes on trade court’s ban

A federal appeals court put the brakes Thursday on a lower court order that overturned most of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs.

nypost.com

A federal appeals court put the brakes Thursday on a lower court order that overturned most of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs.

A full 11-judge panel on the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit stayed the order by the Manhattan-based Court of International Trade while a White House appeal is heard.

The Court of International Trade had ruled that Trump exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act by imposing a 10% flat duty rate on dozens of countries around the world — as well as 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico and 20% tariffs on China in response to illegal fentanyl trafficking.

Comment:
The Radical Left judges are exceeding their authority.
We have system of checks and balances.
The Democrats are a threat to "democracy".

Did you read the decision. From 2 republicans and even a Trump appointee.

They clearly spell out that tariffs (think Smoot Hawley) is an article I power. And constitutional powers can only be ceded narrowly, such as for national security. Which is why the president can put tariffs on steel, and aluminum, which are strategic materials.
Barbies, and pencils are not.

 

[Failzero]

More winning ( Two Judicial wins in 11 hours )

 

[meaner gene]

Every time a judge gets overturned it dings their credibility... maybe this and other overruled decisions will stop this neo lawfare shit...

Are you talking about all the judges who said that Obamacare was unconstitutional.

Yeah, they got no credibility.

 

[meaner gene]

Every time a judge gets overturned it dings their credibility... maybe this and other overruled decisions will stop this neo lawfare shit...

In 2018, a U.S. District Judge in Texas ruled the entire Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, unconstitutional. The judge, Reed O'Connor, determined that the individual mandate was unconstitutional, and because he believed it was not severable from other parts of the law, he struck down the entire ACA. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals later reversed O'Connor's decision

 

[Failzero]

Are you talking about all the judges who said that Obamacare was unconstitutional.

Yeah, they got no credibility.

The Judges who are activist Judiciary of all stripes

 

[meaner gene]

Every time a judge gets overturned it dings their credibility... maybe this and other overruled decisions will stop this neo lawfare shit...

On January 31st, when Judge Roger Vinson declared the individual mandate of ObamaCare to be unconstitutional, he also determined that the legislation could not be severed from the rest of the legislation, nullifying the entire law

 

[meaner gene]

The ACA has been a political hot topic since its inception under the Obama Administration. Opinions on its viability, implications of care, and cost measures have been widely debated and the law has been challenged in court more than 2,000 times since its enactment.

That's a lot of judges who got overturned.

 

[1srelluc]

All that matters is the win....They can't stave off the force that is Trump but for so long.

Full speed ahead!

 

[meaner gene]

All that matters is the win....They can't stave off the force that is Trump but for so long.

Full speed ahead!

 

[Robert W]

That's a lot of judges who got overturned.

It is happening again under our president Trump.

 

[meaner gene]

It is happening again under our president Trump.

The argument that judges are standing in the way of the president enacting what the people elected him to do.

Obamacare ring a bell?

 

[Robert W]

The argument that judges are standing in the way of the president enacting what the people elected him to do.

Obamacare ring a bell?

Nope.

 

[meaner gene]

The argument that judges are standing in the way of the president enacting what the people elected him to do.

Obamacare ring a bell?

Nope.

Let me remind you

During his 2008 presidential campaign, Barack Obama made several key promises regarding healthcare reform, which ultimately led to the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare.

Senator Barack Obama of Illinois defeating Senator John McCain of Arizona by a wide margin,
Popular vote margin Democratic +7.3%

Electoral vote
Barack Obama (D) 365
John McCain (R) 173

 

[meaner gene]

Nope.

The ACA has been a political hot topic since its inception under the Obama Administration. Opinions on its viability, implications of care, and cost measures have been widely debated and the law has been challenged in court more than 2,000 times since its enactment

 

[The Duke]

Repost

Did you read the decision. From 2 republicans and even a Trump appointee.

They clearly spell out that tariffs (think Smoot Hawley) is an article I power. And constitutional powers can only be ceded narrowly, such as for national security. Which is why the president can put tariffs on steel, and aluminum, which are strategic materials.
Barbies, and pencils are not.

I disagree.

The ACA has been a political hot topic since its inception under the Obama Administration. Opinions on its viability, implications of care, and cost measures have been widely debated and the law has been challenged in court more than 2,000 times since its enactment

It's crap. Commie crap. America was better before that and The Patriot Act.

 

[meaner gene]

It's crap. Commie crap. America was better before that and The Patriot Act.

Completely avoids the point:

The argument that judges are standing in the way of the president enacting what the people elected him to do.

 

[The Duke]

Completely avoids the point:

The argument that judges are standing in the way of the president enacting what the people elected him to do.

Yeah, they are. Shortly they may find themselves the judges of nothing.
That's where this IS going, Sista #3.
I forgot who I was responding to, you're a retard.

 

[busybee01]

Trump tariffs back on after appeals court slams brakes on trade court’s ban

A federal appeals court put the brakes Thursday on a lower court order that overturned most of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs.

nypost.com

A federal appeals court put the brakes Thursday on a lower court order that overturned most of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs.

A full 11-judge panel on the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit stayed the order by the Manhattan-based Court of International Trade while a White House appeal is heard.

The Court of International Trade had ruled that Trump exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act by imposing a 10% flat duty rate on dozens of countries around the world — as well as 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico and 20% tariffs on China in response to illegal fentanyl trafficking.

Comment:
The Radical Left judges are exceeding their authority.
We have system of checks and balances.
The Democrats are a threat to "democracy".

The radicals are the fascist judges who overruled the decision. Clearly there is no basis to impose tariffs except through normal channels. The people who made the original decision were appointed by both Republicans and Democrats including Trump.