Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Effort to Delay Trial in Fraud Case

[Procrustes Stretched]

Appeals court will not delay Donald Trump civil fraud trial​

MSN

www.msn.com

The guy just keeps losing in the courts of law. He keeps speaking to the court of public opinion, with mixed results. I believe his lawyers should be sanctioned. Looks to me like they keep listening to him, rather than giving him sound legal advice.NEW YORK (Reuters) - A New York appeals court on Thursday refused to delay Donald Trump's scheduled Oct. 2 civil fraud trial, after the former U.S. president accused the trial judge of wrongly refusing to throw out most of the case.In a brief order, a five-judge panel of the Appellate Division, a mid-level appeals court in Manhattan, denied Trump's motion to postpone the trial.

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A New York appeals court on Thursday refused to delay Donald Trump's scheduled Oct. 2 civil fraud trial, after the former U.S. president accused the trial judge of wrongly refusing to throw out most of the case.

In a brief order, a five-judge panel of the Appellate Division, a mid-level appeals court in Manhattan, denied Trump's motion to postpone the trial.


It also lifted a Sept. 14 order by Justice David Friedman to put the trial on hold while it considered Trump's motion. Friedman was part of Thursday's panel.

The panel ruled two days after state court Justice Arthur Engoron found that Trump and his family business persistently and fraudulently overvalued his assets and net worth in order to obtain better terms on loans and insurance.

Trump had been sued in September 2022 by state Attorney General Letitia James, who accused him, his adult sons, the Trump Organization and others of "staggering fraud" in how they valued properties.

James is seeking at least $250 million in penalties, a ban against Trump and his sons Donald Jr and Eric from running businesses in New York, and a five-year commercial real estate ban against Trump and the Trump Organization.

 

[JGalt]

 

[candycorn]

Appeals court will not delay Donald Trump civil fraud trial​

MSN

www.msn.com

The guy just keeps losing in the courts of law. He keeps speaking to the court of public opinion, with mixed results. I believe his lawyers should be sanctioned. Looks to me like they keep listening to him, rather than giving him sound legal advice.NEW YORK (Reuters) - A New York appeals court on Thursday refused to delay Donald Trump's scheduled Oct. 2 civil fraud trial, after the former U.S. president accused the trial judge of wrongly refusing to throw out most of the case.In a brief order, a five-judge panel of the Appellate Division, a mid-level appeals court in Manhattan, denied Trump's motion to postpone the trial.

Another win for the good guys.

 

[g5000]

Appeals court will not delay Donald Trump civil fraud trial​

MSN

www.msn.com

The guy just keeps losing in the courts of law. He keeps speaking to the court of public opinion, with mixed results. I believe his lawyers should be sanctioned. Looks to me like they keep listening to him, rather than giving him sound legal advice.NEW YORK (Reuters) - A New York appeals court on Thursday refused to delay Donald Trump's scheduled Oct. 2 civil fraud trial, after the former U.S. president accused the trial judge of wrongly refusing to throw out most of the case.In a brief order, a five-judge panel of the Appellate Division, a mid-level appeals court in Manhattan, denied Trump's motion to postpone the trial.

Way ahead of you: Mark October 2nd On Your Calendar

 

[g5000]

View attachment 835609

The Fifth Avenue MAGAtards chime in.

 

[Kilroy2]

Trump is on a downhill roll with his cases. No where to go but down hill.

Comer should learn something from the justice system. You need clear and convincing evidence. If your going after Joe Biden then say that and don't pretend that it's the Biden family. it may work in the political arena but it won't in the judicial system.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

View attachment 835609

If he's on the ballot.

As a write in it would be a protest of nothing.

 

[progressive hunter]

 

[bodecea]

Appeals court will not delay Donald Trump civil fraud trial​

MSN

www.msn.com

The guy just keeps losing in the courts of law. He keeps speaking to the court of public opinion, with mixed results. I believe his lawyers should be sanctioned. Looks to me like they keep listening to him, rather than giving him sound legal advice.NEW YORK (Reuters) - A New York appeals court on Thursday refused to delay Donald Trump's scheduled Oct. 2 civil fraud trial, after the former U.S. president accused the trial judge of wrongly refusing to throw out most of the case.In a brief order, a five-judge panel of the Appellate Division, a mid-level appeals court in Manhattan, denied Trump's motion to postpone the trial.

Good.

 

[bodecea]

View attachment 835609

Why not....you vote for a sexual abuser....why not a fraud and crook too. Telling.

 

[JGalt]

If he's on the ballot.

As a write in it would be a protest of nothing.

There not a thing you can do to keep him off the ballot.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

There not a thing you can do to keep him off the ballot.

Me? No.

But in a few states, we shall see.

 

[JGalt]

Me? No.

But in a few states, we shall see.

Supreme Court will rule that unconstitutional. You idiots have been trying for over 6 years to "get Trump", but you've failed every time.

Get used to it: Donald J. Trump is going to be your next President. So deal with it.

 

[beautress]

View attachment 835609

Outta the park, JGalt! I love it!!!

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Supreme Court will rule that unconstitutional. You idiots have been trying for over 6 years to "get Trump", but you've failed every time.

Get used to it: Donald J. Trump is going to be your next President. So deal with it.

Will they?

O'tay

 

[bodecea]

Supreme Court will rule that unconstitutional. You idiots have been trying for over 6 years to "get Trump", but you've failed every time.

Get used to it: Donald J. Trump is going to be your next President. So deal with it.

And what makes you think the Supreme Court would rule the 14th Amendment to be unConstitutional?

BTW...how many indictments so far?

 

[JGalt]

Will they?

O'tay

O'tay for sure. Trump is beating the other GOP candidates by what, 50 something points now? And beating Biden by 10 points. You can bet on one thing: Trump's lead over Biden is going to increase over the next year, especially since Biden has another year to fuck things up as badly as he has for the last three years.

Biden's not about to magically develop a plan and turn his incompetence around. He's going to continue fucking up, which is the only thin g he knows how to do. Like Barack Obama once said, "Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up."

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

O'tay for sure. Trump is beating the other GOP candidates by what, 50 something points now? And beating Biden by 10 points. You can bet on one thing: Trump's lead over Biden is going to increase over the next year, especially since Biden has another year to fuck things up as badly as he has for the last three years.

Biden's not about to magically develop a plan and turn his incompetence around. He's going to continue fucking up, which is the only thin g he knows how to do. Like Barack Obama once said, "Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up."

He could hopefully have a stroke or a heart attack before the primaries are over. God interceding.

Keep hope alive!

 

[JGalt]

He could hopefully have a stroke or a heart attack before the primaries are over. God interceding.

Keep hope alive!

More than likely it'll be you who has the stroke or heart attack, after the election's over. Brace up, little buddy. 2024-2028 are going to be four long years for you.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Yep, Monday it is...

great read:

Ever since debt was invented in ancient Sumer, there have probably been people enriching themselves through bad investments. The trick is to make these investments using other people’s money.

Suppose, for example, that a wheeler-dealer uses borrowed funds to make risky investments in New Jersey casinos. If the investments somehow end up making money, he can pocket the profits. But if the investments fail, he may — if he’s been tricky about the wording in his loans or manages to persuade his creditors not to go after his other assets — be able to walk away and leave other people holding the bag. That is, it’s heads he wins, tails the creditors lose.

He may also be able to siphon off some of the borrowed money, say by having the casinos pay him or businesses he owns large sums for various services before they go bust.

As readers may have guessed, this isn’t a hypothetical example. It is the story of Donald Trump’s New Jersey casino empire, a venture ending in multiple bankruptcies that was a disaster for outside investors but appears to have been quite profitable for Trump.

Opinion | Hail to the Fraudster in Chief

But Trump supporters probably won’t admit they were fooled.

www.nytimes.com