Does AOC believe in total government ownership of production and distribution, with little in the way of private property?
That's what real socialism is.
Serious question. I don't know.
.
How could you be so ignorant at this point? Oh yeah you listen only to GOP garbage hate character assassination Fox noise and demagogues on the radio and internet.... Democratic socialists, known as socialists everywhere in the real world and modern world but cold war dinosaur GOP dupe America, are for Fair capitalism with a good safety net always democratic... Which thanks to the GOP we do not have here. thanks to the GOP giveaway to the rich we have the worst inequality upward Mobility and benefits of any modern country. Great job! Why are we the only modern country without Healthcare daycare paid parental leave great vacations and infrastructure, cheap college and training, living wage ID card to end illegal immigration? Only brainwashing propaganda and silly dupes like you make it possible....
The difference between Socialism and Communism is not very much.
One is an economic system, the other is a political system.
However, what YOU are describing is neither.
You are describing
Dirgisme, State directed capitalism, or corporatism. It is no wonder you are so ignorant since the state directed capitalism has allowed such destruction of the free market and consolidation of the press, we no longer have a free press, but a propaganda system.
You don't know your ass from a whole in the ground. You THINK you are a "Socialist," when in reality, you are nothing but a fascist.
Dirigisme - Wikipedia
Dirigisme or dirigism (from French diriger, meaning 'to direct') is an economic doctrine in which the state plays a strong directive role, as opposed to a merely regulatory role, over a capitalist market economy.[1] As an economic doctrine, dirigisme is the opposite to laissez-faire, stressing a positive role for state intervention in curbing productive inefficiencies and market failures. Dirigiste policies often include indicative planning, state-directed investment, and the use of market instruments (taxes and subsidies).
The term emerged in the post-war era to describe the economic policies of France, which included substantial state-directed investment, the use of indicative economic planning to supplement the market mechanism, and the establishment of state enterprises in strategic domestic sectors. It resulted in an unprecedented economic and demographic growth, leading to the coinage of the term Trente Glorieuses ("Thirty Glorious [years]").
The term has subsequently been used to classify other economies that pursued similar policies, most notably the East Asian tiger economies, and more recently the economy of the People's Republic of China.[2] A related concept is state capitalism. . . . .
<snip>
. . . . Economic dirigisme has been described as an inherent aspect of fascist economies by Hungarian author, Iván T. Berend in his book An Economic History of Twentieth-Century Europe.[4] However, the Fascist systems created by Benito Mussolini (Italy), António Salazar (Portugal), Francisco Franco (Spain) Emperor Hirohito (Japan), and Adolf Hitler (Germany) are a varied mix of elements from numerous philosophies, including: nationalism, authoritarianism, militarism, corporatism, collectivism, totalitarianism, and anti-communism.[5]
You either don't know shit about politics and economics, and the difference between the two, or you are an active agent of misinformation.
My guess from the way you post? You are the former.