Why do we still seem to be enamored with AOC? She has been proven herself to be the least effective member of the House (thank God!). She is dumber than shit. Nobody doubtās that she is utilized by the neo-Marxist revolutionaries as a useful fool to pimp their destructive ideology. She is emotionally stunted, etcā¦ So why is she still a darling of the press? I will tell you why.
This is still largely a manās world, and the overwhelming majority of men in this world, regardless of whether they agree with AOCās stupid politics, want to paint her light-brown face pearl white. Itās just the way it is. I think she is a shit head, and that the stupid shit she says makes her less attractive to me. But I would still hit that. I would scorch that cooter without a second thought. But I digress.
I strongly suspect that her insidious ideological pimps, the Marxist āJustice Democratsā, picked AOC for this purpose (and because she is lobotomy-stupid and will, therefore, say whatever they tell her to say). She is like a Trojan horse, with big juicy tits.
Do you know what ādemocratic socialismā really is? I do not mean its academic definition, or some perverted interpretation thereof. I mean, do you REALLY know what it is? I am going to tell you. If you listen closely to the words spoken in the speeches of Lenin and Trotsky you will hear them talk about āthe peopleā being authorized in their system to decide what shall be done with the wealth of the Soviet Union (e.g., means of production, national resources, etc...). The people decide. The people, as a collective, are empowered to allocate wealth and resources. This appealed to the long-suffering people there. And why wouldnāt it? The people in Russia at that time were starving peasants put through war and living under a Czar that had much, generating class envy. The Bolsheviks took advantage of this to inject their venom into the body politic.
Leninās use of this idea ā that āthe peopleā would decide how to allocate resources; i.e., democratic socialism ā was intentional in order to attract people to his ideology and to party. It was a trick. It was also a lie. It was a fake and ongoing ārevolutionā (a communist idea necessary to perpetuate the cause). In practice, however, it is pure authoritarianism.
Everyone who desires freedom should ALWAYS beware of any ideology that stresses the value of the collective over the individual. Our Founders were all too aware of the evils that may arise when political power is allowed to be concentrated in one, or very few, areas in the state. The remedy is to decentralize power, and then enforce a system of decentralized power. Essentially, you are enforcing a system that will allow individuals to be free, or at least enjoy the degree of freedom guaranteed by no other political system in the world, ever.
The collective, however, overrides the interest in the individual and instead focuses on the group. The state rewards those in a group, encouraging people to identify as a group rather than as an individual. This strengthens the group and allows it to be directed by a small number of people. You see this model in wide use today in America. It is toxic to the founding principles of decentralized power and individualism. It is a danger to the Republic and, therefore, a danger to the freedom of you and I.
Does AOC understand this? Does she understand the implication of her stupid rhetoric? Of course not! She is dumb as a stump. She is a zombie sheep that foolishly believes that democratic socialism is a true and viable political paradigm. The Bolshevik sheep believed this too.
AOC does not know what the fuck she is talking about. Neither do most of the talking heads in the media when it comes to this stuff. They ask, āDonāt you want to take the power of the capitalist corporate overlords to determine your fate away from them?ā But if you read between the lines (and lies) what they are really asking is āDonāt you want to cede your individual autonomy, as largely guaranteed by the American Constitution, to a centralized authoritarian regime who will control every aspect of your life?ā
āDemocratic socialismā is not real. It is a rhetorical construct, seemingly legitimized in the minds of idiots due to the academic blatherings about it. The idea for such a unicorn utopian existence has been around for well over a century. But have you ever seen it in practice? Of course not. This is because for any democratic system to work there must be a substantial amount of power vested in the individual, independent of any sort of collective interest. āDemocratic socialismā is fundamentally, and fatally, flawed in this way. The idea that DS is a legitimate, sustainable form of governance is asinine. It is illogical. It is untried. And it is totally and completely embraced by AOC. What a stupid fucking idiot.
