Did you know Seth Rich was murdered right outside of Mueller's Home?
https://steemit.com/politics/@andrewjoseph/yes-the-dnc-had-seth-rich-murdered-here-is-how-i-know
Webb is pursuing the Awan brothers congressional hacker story to multiple residents and business addresses associated with the Pakistani brothers. This includes Nanoset Technologies, Awan Brothers Inc. and Cars International. While being employed by congressional Democrats the Awans were receiving a salary that paid them double the average staffer’s wage. It does seem odd that there would be so many businesses associated with a single family who all had well paying government IT positions.
George has been able to verify through various home owners and tenants in the Falls Church and Springfield Virginia area that Imran Awan (also using the name Alex) had previously been a renter.
An unidentified US Marine described as “very patriotic” informed Webb that the Awans had left blackberries and laptops at their former residence that the devices had clear government ID tags.
Seth Rich Murder
In an unexpected twist Webb decided to follow a lead which would cross paths with the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich.
Webb intended to try to meet with investigator and proprietor of the whokilledsethrich.com website, Jack Burkman.
http://whokilledsethrich.com
Jack Burkman is a Washington DC Republican lobbyist and regular TV political pundit who befriended the Rich family and has spoken on their behalf on several occasions. Burkman is an avid proponent of "family values", however his name has also been identified as appearing in the DC Madam's black book.
The Crime Scene
In earlier versions of day 171, Webb asks his followers to tweet out the exact location of Rich's murder. Making his way from the Pakistani embassy Webb visited the corner of W Street and Flagler, the location of the murder scene.
What he discovered was that Seth survived for several hours after being shot at 4:20am in the morning. Furthermore, he was conscious, sitting upright and speaking with people (police officers) until he died sometime before 6am.
Of course, this leads one to speculate as to what Rich said in his final minutes. Did he know his attackers? Did he describe them?
In addition, George discovered that there’s a convenience store located across the street from where Seth was shot. He also claims that the CCTV cameras captured footage of the two assailants and the video evidence is being suppressed.
This information is not widely known but it had been previously reported by the Washington Post, no less. From the Washington Post January 2017:
Police told the family, Joel Rich said, that a security camera from a small convenience store across the street captured a grainy image of their son collapsing and the feet or legs of two other people — possibly his killers. Officials with D.C. police declined an interview request. A police spokesman would not confirm the existence of a video or reveal what Rich may have said after he was shot, saying that that information could compromise an ongoing investigation.
Source: Archive version of WaPo article
Webb also draws attention to the fact that although whokilledsethrich.com has received over $130,000 in donations, the investigation has stalled. He also claims that the website underwent changes soon after he spoke about it in an earlier video from day 171. Though the death of Seth Rich has garnered some media attention, information regarding the actual events on the night of the murdered is scarce.
In the wee hours of July 10, 2016, in the Bloomingdale area of Washington, D.C., a 27-year-old DNC staffer was shot twice in the back. He died in the hospital approximately two hours later.
His name was Seth Rich.
The D.C. Metropolitan Police Department suggest his murder was the result of a botched robbery. Conspiracy theorists, however,
maintain that Rich was assassinated by the DNC in retaliation for leaking the now infamous DNC emails published by WikiLeaks last fall.
But, to be sure, the Seth Rich story is not so much a “conspiracy theory” as it is a
conspiracy fact. As in, it is a fact that wicked and powerful people conspired to have Seth Rich murdered and the subsequent investigation into his death thwarted.
I know, I know. I know what you are thinking,
‘This cannot be true because…RUSSIA! We all know Russia is responsible for hacking the DNC, we all know Russia is responsible for Trump’s victory, and we all know Russia is responsible for my daughter’s case of the sneezes.’
Well, frankly, there is simply no telling what kind of remote nose-tickling technologies the Kremlin is holding. But, as for the DNC emails—which are at the very heart of “Russiagate” (that nebulous, ubiquitous, pernicious Russian influence we hear so much about)—there is a straight forward way to interrogate whether Russia was responsible for their release. We could examine the DNC’s server.
But, as it happened, the DNC refused to give the FBI access to their servers.
That’s right. The originators and steadfast champions of Russiagate did not give the proper authorities the critical piece of evidence at the heart of it all.
The DNC did, however, reach a compromise with the FBI, whereby they contracted a cybersecurity firm, CrowdStrike, to analyze their server. CrowdStrike, in turn, reported that “Guccifer 2.0” (whom originally distributed the leaked DNC emails) left his or her supposed Russian “fingerprints” on the materials.
It is CrowdStrike, not the FBI, who is at the bottom of the oft-repeated claim that Russia hacked the DNC.
But, what of those “seventeen intelligence agencies” who supposedly confirmed it was the Russians? First, it was not seventeen agencies. It was three. Nonetheless, this claim stems from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) report, in which the FBI and the CIA indeed expressed “high confidence” that Russia, among other things, hacked the DNC emails. The NSA expressed “moderate confidence” in the same.
But, without being given access to the DNC server, the ODNI based this portion of their assessment solely on the CrowdStrike report.
Moreover, worse still, it is known that digital fingerprints, such as allegedly identified by CrowdStrike, can be falsely planted—and some researchers claim to have proven this is exactly what occurred.
Thus, the entirety of the evidence regarding the alleged Russian hack of the DNC amounts to: an inconclusive and highly suspect report, from a firm of questionable competence and integrity, who were contracted by a keenly interested yet curiously evasive party.
Color me “highly unimpressed” and “moderately amused.”
On the other hand, there is overwhelming—indeed, conclusive—countervailing evidence that Russia did not hack the DNC, but rather the DNC suffered a leak...and, that the leaker paid for this with his life. Let's dive in:
The Circumstances of Rich’s death are highly suggestive of targeted assassination, and highly inconsistent with “botched robbery”
Rich’s face, hands, and knees were bruised—there was a struggle. He was shot twice in the back. Nothing was stolen.
If this was a botched robbery, it was one of the botchiest botched robberies in the history of botched robbery. The now half million-dollar reward, coupled with the ongoing lack of suspects, further underscores this was not perpetrated by low-level criminals.
If, on the other hand, as all indications suggest, it was a targeted assassination, then who, pray tell, would possibly have the motive to kill this happy-go-lucky patriot? (Perhaps someone who knew Rich had exposed their corruption, and threatened their bid to become leader of the free world?)
Seth Rich was not in a gang. He was not a victim of domestic violence. Outside these contexts, targeted “hits” are incredibly rare.
Kim Dotcom is willing to testify Seth Rich was the source of the leak
The New Zealander entrepreneur, Kim Dotcom, knew about the DNC email dump for publication—this makes him incredibly credible on the topic. He says he had communicated with Rich, knows he was the leaker, and is willing to testify to that effect.
It remains to be seen whether Dotcom has emails or otherwise computer forensic evidence to back up this claim. But, frankly, this is mostly neither here nor there at this point. His self-insertion into America’s most significant political story, Russiagate, and his willingness to testify under threat of perjury is itself an enormous data point. What motive could he possibly have for doing this, if he is not, in fact, telling the truth?
Notice also how he is calling the bluff of CrowdStrike and ODNI. Dotcom would not be willing to testify if he thought there was a possibility they really could prove that Russia hacked the DNC, i.e., Dotcom would certainly not blatantly perjure himself. That is to say, his mere willingness to testify speaks volumes about his confidence and thus veracity (indeed, all the more so given his foreknowledge of the publication of the emails)
Craig Murray, claims he had a clandestine meeting in D.C. where he physically received the emails. He states, “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.” Murray alleges the leaker's motivation was “disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation” and the “tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.”
Guccifer 2.0 allegedly stated Rich was the leaker
Guccifer 2.0, who originally distributed the emails, says Seth “was [his] whistleblower.”
Julian Assange has repeatedly intimated Rich was the leaker, and is emphatic Russia was not the source
Julian Assange is emphatic WikiLeaks did not receive the DNC emails from Russia, and on at least two occasions has hinted Seth Rich was the leaker. For their part, Wikileaks has offered a $20,000 reward for information leading to the conviction of Rich’s killer and has also retweeted a Fox News report wherein investigator Rod Wheeler stated Seth Rich had contact with WikiLeaks.
Why would Julian Assange, holed up in an Ecuadorian embassy in London, be speaking about a "random botched robbery" in D.C.? Why would WikiLeaks be tweeting about and offering a reward regarding the same?
In short, everyone best placed to know—Assange, Guccifer 2.0, Murray, and Dotcom—all suggest (more or less) that Rich was the source of the leak.
But, as is often the case, the mainstream media has it ass backwards. The real “crazy conspiracy theory” regarding Seth Rich is that a New Zealander entrepreneur, a British diplomat, an unknown mysterious hacker, and WikiLeaks are all inexplicably conspiring to…defame the already defeatedHillary Clinton? The mainstream media would also have you believe that the DNC refused to turn over their would-be evidence of the supposed Russian hack (server) to the FBI because...ummm…remote Russian mind-numbing technology?
John Podesta is on record as in favor of “making an example of” a suspected leaker
Yikes. That seems pretty damning.
Something is incredibly strange about Michael Mueller...
Seth Rich was shot in the street outside of the home of Michael Mueller. On July 11, 2016, the day following Rich's murder, Mueller did an interview with NBC. When asked if he thought Rich's death was the result of a botched robbery, bizarrely, he momentarily fights back laughter before answering in the affirmative. He later made somewhat contradictory remarks about the events at a vigil for Rich. Finally, curiously, Mueller appears to have visited the White House two weeks after Rich's death.
There is a demonstrable cover up regarding Seth Rich’s murder
- There was a struggle, DNA evidence therefore likely exists, but has not been released.
- 125 members of Congress have been asked to comment on the Seth Rich case. None did. (The lone Congressman who has gone on record expressed sympathy toward the conspiracy.)
- The Washington Post spread fake news discrediting Kim Dotcom.
FULL STORY AT THIS LINK:
https://steemit.com/politics/@andrewjoseph/yes-the-dnc-had-seth-rich-murdered-here-is-how-i-know
