Zone1 Anti White Racism Does Not Exist.

[IM2]

It's really not funny how some try to manipulate laws. One prime example is the misuse of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. So let's take a look back at the 14th Amendment and exactly WHY it was created. The equal protection clause in the Fourteenth Amendment was made after slavery to protect blacks from discrimination. When the 14th Amendment passed, “quotas” were 100 percent white. Yet today, we see whites complaining about anti white racism when a university is majority white or they are applying for jobs or working for promotions where the empoyees or upper management is predominatly white.

We see the stories being told here. A person is passed over on a job where the majority of employees or employees in high positions are whites, then they complain about anti white racism. Again, when the 14th Amendment was passed, everything was 100 percent white. There were no jobs that 80 percent of the employees were black and a black person got passed over for someone white.

In NO situation can a black person complain about discrimination when an employer or University is majority black. Not one prospective black student at a HBCU can file a discrimination claim based on the 14th Amendment because a white student was admitted while that black student was not. 20 percent of all HBCU students are white, and not once have we seen SFA, Americxa First, or any similar "organization" take a case from a black student denied entry at an HBCU or a black owned businsess because they admitted or hired somebody white. There is no such thing as anti white racism, that's another race hustle by the rght.

The Truth about Anti-White Discrimination
Many white Americans feel that discrimination against whites is on the rise. Experiments suggests otherwise

The Truth about Anti-White Discrimination

Many white Americans feel that discrimination against whites is on the rise. Experiments suggests otherwise

www.scientificamerican.com

 

[MarcATL]

100% OP, in fact Race scholars use the term white supremacy to describe a sociopolitical economic system of domination based on racial categories that benefits those defined and perceived as white. This system of structural power privileges, centralizes, and elevates white people as a group. If, for example, we look at the racial breakdown of the people who control our institutions, we see telling numbers in 2016–2017:

• Ten richest Americans: 100 percent white (seven of whom are among the ten richest in the world)
• US Congress: 90 percent white
• US governors: 96 percent white
• Top military advisers: 100 percent white
• President and vice president: 100 percent white
• US House Freedom Caucus: 99 percent white
• Current US presidential cabinet: 91 percent white
• People who decide which TV shows we see: 93 percent white
• People who decide which books we read: 90 percent white
• People who decide which news is covered: 85 percent white
• People who decide which music is produced: 95 percent white
• People who directed the one hundred top-grossing films of all time, worldwide: 95 percent white
• Teachers: 82 percent white
• Full-time college professors: 84 percent white
• Owners of men’s professional football teams: 97 percent white

These numbers are not describing minor organizations. Nor are these institutions special-interest groups. The groups listed above are the most powerful in the country. These numbers are not a matter of “good people” versus “bad people.” They represent power and control by a racial group that is in the position to disseminate and protect its own self-image, worldview, and interests across the entire society.”
― Robin DiAngelo, White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism
Source: Robin DiAngelo Quotes (Author of White Fragility)

 

[IM2]

100% OP, in fact Race scholars use the term white supremacy to describe a sociopolitical economic system of domination based on racial categories that benefits those defined and perceived as white. This system of structural power privileges, centralizes, and elevates white people as a group. If, for example, we look at the racial breakdown of the people who control our institutions, we see telling numbers in 2016–2017:

• Ten richest Americans: 100 percent white (seven of whom are among the ten richest in the world)
• US Congress: 90 percent white
• US governors: 96 percent white
• Top military advisers: 100 percent white
• President and vice president: 100 percent white
• US House Freedom Caucus: 99 percent white
• Current US presidential cabinet: 91 percent white
• People who decide which TV shows we see: 93 percent white
• People who decide which books we read: 90 percent white
• People who decide which news is covered: 85 percent white
• People who decide which music is produced: 95 percent white
• People who directed the one hundred top-grossing films of all time, worldwide: 95 percent white
• Teachers: 82 percent white
• Full-time college professors: 84 percent white
• Owners of men’s professional football teams: 97 percent white

These numbers are not describing minor organizations. Nor are these institutions special-interest groups. The groups listed above are the most powerful in the country. These numbers are not a matter of “good people” versus “bad people.” They represent power and control by a racial group that is in the position to disseminate and protect its own self-image, worldview, and interests across the entire society.”
― Robin DiAngelo, White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism
Source: Robin DiAngelo Quotes (Author of White Fragility)

A strong case to prove the fallacy of the claim of anti white racism.