Let me ask you a question, Dana.
If the government mandates invasive medical procedures like vaccinations, what do you think the lobbyists for companies like Merk and Pfizer are going to do once they know said mandate to consume pharmaceutical products exists?
Once you submit that the government can mandate what medical procedures you must have, these companies are going to line their lobbyists up at the door. Would you agree? Do you trust the reputations of those companies and others like them? Their bottom line is profit. What happens next? Now if the government has been granted new powers that allow them to force you to consume whatever products they want, do you think for a second they'll keep that power limited once they have it? History is ripe with examples that quite the opposite happens. Millions of dollars in lobbyist money is a powerful thing and leave the possibility to corrupt the minds of any lawmaker. We've seen it too many times.
As far as being anti-vaccination, I'm not anti-vaccination. My offspring has his vaccinations. But I didn't need the force of a government gun and their corporate lobbyists to do it.
Heck, former CDC director Dr. Julie Gerberding
left her post at the government agency in 2009 to work as President of Merck’s vaccine division. It's a revolving door of corruption. Not only that, one year they're working on a study for the safety of their product and the next year they're working for a government agency approving their own product. It's crazy.
The
Nuremberg Code’s first principle is
voluntary consent, but it seems the lessons of history have been completely forgotten by today’s leaders.