When companies are all ra ra pro war military , do you consider that politics ?
yes. name a business.
Actually I already did -- NFL. Just to use something current.
--- or was that post taken down
too?
nfl isn't a company. nor is baseball or hockey or any sporting league. it is a league made up of businesses. And it doesn't promote military, it recognizes them.
You want to distinguish between "company" and "business" to slither out of this? Based on what, whether they "make" something?
This just in --- any company or business can be engaged in either a
product or a
service. Entertainment could be considered either; in the abstract it's certainly spoken of as a product.
NFL (MLB, etc) are profit-making ventures: "businesses" a/k/a "companies" as that's how they're structured. If little Timmy sells lemonade on the street he's operating a business, not a company, but long before you get to the level of NFL you're a "company" as well.
Now on to Thing Two -- "it doesn't promote military, it recognizes them"
Inasmuch as there is no -- Zero --- none --- relationship between a jingo war-song exercise and a football game, there is nothing to "recognize". It's something that was NEVER PRESENT until NFL plunked it in there. And it does that and similar exercises for profit ... profit taken from your tax dollars Bubba. Profit dictated there by the same MIC war machine that generates the wars that follow.
So the answer stands --- NFL is a ready example of a company (or "businesss") that is "all ra ra [sic] pro-military". It can't be denied especially when it's injecting paid advertising into a theater where thousands of people gathered, NONE of whom came to see Jingo Jangles.
So enough of this selective outrage bullshit. It's transparent as a pane of glass.