Anti-Redskins Tribal Leader Decries Redskins as Offensive, While Donning Blackface for Halloween

[Pogo]

Apparently you already know who I vote for, so that's already "settled". The question would be which of them are "racists". I take it you mean all of them.

How 'bout my local sheriff? The one who ran as a Democrat one election and as a Republican the next one? Is he a "racist" both times?

The first question though, the one you're desperately trying to dance around and hope it goes away (it won't) is to explain why you call me a "racist".

I don't expect an answer. I do expect a dance marathon.

Hit it.


Now isn't this "special". What does this passage mean? Are you saying all "Democrats" are by definition "racists"?

I admit to a taste for low hanging fruit but even I get more than I can eat sometimes ::burp::

I know who you advocate on message boards, why would you vote for someone other than who you advocate?

You do huh?

Who? Names? Threads? Posts?
Tell me all about this because that's not the sort of thing I do. I don't even lobby for candidates I like -- well, I did post about voting for Jon Huntsman, that's the only one I remember. What I DO do is argue against bad logic.

So ---- who? Where? When?

Yep, personal responsibility, paying your own bills, giving charity by choice not force, you argue against all that "bad logic"

Reaalllly.

Links?

You do know what "links" means, right? I'm not asking for breakfast food.

You're challenging me to a golf match?

As you well know, you don't get to ask questions, you don't answer them. Well, technically you can ask them as you're a word parser, I just don't give a shit

When you answer questions, I'll give a shit when you ask them. This part is actually a serious reply.

This is another of his Klown parade--- pretend it was the one who asked the question, after itself making the assertion.

Still waiting on those links.

 

[kaz]

No, if your story is you don't vote then I would concede that, do you not vote? You are a word parser, so that you don't "vote" for Democrats would be right if you don't actually vote

Apparently you already know who I vote for, so that's already "settled". The question would be which of them are "racists". I take it you mean all of them.

How 'bout my local sheriff? The one who ran as a Democrat one election and as a Republican the next one? Is he a "racist" both times?

The first question though, the one you're desperately trying to dance around and hope it goes away (it won't) is to explain why you call me a "racist".

I don't expect an answer. I do expect a dance marathon.

Hit it.

No, if your story is you don't vote then I would concede that, do you not vote? You are a word parser, so that you don't "vote" for Democrats would be right if you don't actually vote

Now isn't this "special". What does this passage mean? Are you saying all "Democrats" are by definition "racists"?

I admit to a taste for low hanging fruit but even I get more than I can eat sometimes ::burp::

I know who you advocate on message boards, why would you vote for someone other than who you advocate?

You do huh?

Who? Names? Threads? Posts?
Tell me all about this because that's not the sort of thing I do. I don't even lobby for candidates I like -- well, I did post about voting for Jon Huntsman, that's the only one I remember. What I DO do is argue against bad logic.

So ---- who? Where? When?

Yep, personal responsibility, paying your own bills, giving charity by choice not force, you argue against all that "bad logic"

Take this post for instance. Your claim is a bunch of hot air and when you cant prove it you will deflect.

Hey, sorry guy, but you only get to win with the Kommunist Klown Kar word of the day contest once, you can't keep repeating the word and continuing to get rewarded.

Just kidding! Bodecea, pie in the face, LoneLaugher, seltzer down your pants! Well done, the word of the day twice! You're going to have to do laundry today, aren't you?

 

[kaz]

I know who you advocate on message boards, why would you vote for someone other than who you advocate?

You do huh?

Who? Names? Threads? Posts?
Tell me all about this because that's not the sort of thing I do. I don't even lobby for candidates I like -- well, I did post about voting for Jon Huntsman, that's the only one I remember. What I DO do is argue against bad logic.

So ---- who? Where? When?

Yep, personal responsibility, paying your own bills, giving charity by choice not force, you argue against all that "bad logic"

Reaalllly.

Links?

You do know what "links" means, right? I'm not asking for breakfast food.

You're challenging me to a golf match?

As you well know, you don't get to ask questions, you don't answer them. Well, technically you can ask them as you're a word parser, I just don't give a shit

When you answer questions, I'll give a shit when you ask them. This part is actually a serious reply.

This is another of his Klown parade--- pretend he was the one who asked the question, after himself making the assertion. :lame:

Wow, I'm disappointed, the word parser didn't read carefully. I did't say you didn't ask a perfectly valid question, I just said I'm not answering it since you don't answer my perfectly valid questions. you make snotty remarks that don't address anything. And you're not even funny like I am

 

[Asclepias]

Apparently you already know who I vote for, so that's already "settled". The question would be which of them are "racists". I take it you mean all of them.

How 'bout my local sheriff? The one who ran as a Democrat one election and as a Republican the next one? Is he a "racist" both times?

The first question though, the one you're desperately trying to dance around and hope it goes away (it won't) is to explain why you call me a "racist".

I don't expect an answer. I do expect a dance marathon.

Hit it.


Now isn't this "special". What does this passage mean? Are you saying all "Democrats" are by definition "racists"?

I admit to a taste for low hanging fruit but even I get more than I can eat sometimes ::burp::

I know who you advocate on message boards, why would you vote for someone other than who you advocate?

You do huh?

Who? Names? Threads? Posts?
Tell me all about this because that's not the sort of thing I do. I don't even lobby for candidates I like -- well, I did post about voting for Jon Huntsman, that's the only one I remember. What I DO do is argue against bad logic.

So ---- who? Where? When?

Yep, personal responsibility, paying your own bills, giving charity by choice not force, you argue against all that "bad logic"

Take this post for instance. Your claim is a bunch of hot air and when you cant prove it you will deflect.

Hey, sorry guy, but you only get to win with the Kommunist Klown Kar word of the day contest once, you can't keep repeating the word and continuing to get rewarded.

Just kidding! Bodecea, pie in the face, LoneLaugher, seltzer down your pants! Well done, the word of the day twice! You're going to have to do laundry today, aren't you?

Dont get emotionally injured because you lack the intellect to stay with the point. If you concentrate hard and pay attention you may be able to discern whats going on and cease with your deflections. Good luck son.

 

[Pogo]

You do huh?

Who? Names? Threads? Posts?
Tell me all about this because that's not the sort of thing I do. I don't even lobby for candidates I like -- well, I did post about voting for Jon Huntsman, that's the only one I remember. What I DO do is argue against bad logic.

So ---- who? Where? When?

Yep, personal responsibility, paying your own bills, giving charity by choice not force, you argue against all that "bad logic"

Reaalllly.

Links?

You do know what "links" means, right? I'm not asking for breakfast food.

You're challenging me to a golf match?

As you well know, you don't get to ask questions, you don't answer them. Well, technically you can ask them as you're a word parser, I just don't give a shit

When you answer questions, I'll give a shit when you ask them. This part is actually a serious reply.

This is another of his Klown parade--- pretend he was the one who asked the question, after himself making the assertion. :lame:

Wow, I'm disappointed, the word parser didn't read carefully. I did't say you didn't ask a perfectly valid question, I just said I'm not answering it since you don't answer my perfectly valid questions. you make snotty remarks that don't address anything. And you're not even funny like I am

OK that's long enough.

No links.
You failed.
You lose.

Ciao.

 

[kaz]

Global warming.

Youre deflecting and not being very good at it.

Another winner! Deflecting, the word of the day! The bimbo boedeca has a pie in the face for you, and the Klown LoneLaugher will spray seltzer down your pants. Well done, you're a certified grade A good egg by the Kommunist Klown Kar. Shake! BUZZ... Sorry about that. OK, not really. I'll make it up to you, smell my flower. SPRAY! HAHAHAHA, it's what you get being approved by the the Klowns

Basically deflecting means the person accused tried to make a point and when they couldnt they changed the subject with a strawman.

Here's a cookie for stating the obvious.

That you don't have a standard against politicians lying since you are planning to vote for one who lies constantly on the other hand is completely relevant

My post had nothing to do with politicians lying. Hence why your post is called a deflection.

Aw, i'm sorry, the Kommunist Klown Kar word of the day is deflect. I'd take deflection personally, but let's face it, liberals aren't very smart. I advocate we take it and it turns into a long, boring discussion with a bunch of idiot liberals. So I'm afraid you lose.

But we do have a consolation prize. Bodeca! LoneLaugher! Pie in the face and seltzer down the pants for our unfortunate contestant! Bam!

Yes, they are idiots, but it was way shorter this way...

 

[kaz]

Apparently you already know who I vote for, so that's already "settled". The question would be which of them are "racists". I take it you mean all of them.

How 'bout my local sheriff? The one who ran as a Democrat one election and as a Republican the next one? Is he a "racist" both times?

The first question though, the one you're desperately trying to dance around and hope it goes away (it won't) is to explain why you call me a "racist".

I don't expect an answer. I do expect a dance marathon.

Hit it.


Now isn't this "special". What does this passage mean? Are you saying all "Democrats" are by definition "racists"?

I admit to a taste for low hanging fruit but even I get more than I can eat sometimes ::burp::

I know who you advocate on message boards, why would you vote for someone other than who you advocate?

You do huh?

Who? Names? Threads? Posts?
Tell me all about this because that's not the sort of thing I do. I don't even lobby for candidates I like -- well, I did post about voting for Jon Huntsman, that's the only one I remember. What I DO do is argue against bad logic.

So ---- who? Where? When?

Yep, personal responsibility, paying your own bills, giving charity by choice not force, you argue against all that "bad logic"

Take this post for instance. Your claim is a bunch of hot air and when you cant prove it you will deflect.

And he'll keep whining about the hole he/she just dug itself into for days. You watch.

Interesting, so you when you don't answer questions, you're digging yourself into a hole? I like it. Get inside the hole and i'll go get the hose...

 

[Lakhota]

When will NaziCons learn that there's a difference between sounding smart and being smart?

 

[kaz]

I know who you advocate on message boards, why would you vote for someone other than who you advocate?

You do huh?

Who? Names? Threads? Posts?
Tell me all about this because that's not the sort of thing I do. I don't even lobby for candidates I like -- well, I did post about voting for Jon Huntsman, that's the only one I remember. What I DO do is argue against bad logic.

So ---- who? Where? When?

Yep, personal responsibility, paying your own bills, giving charity by choice not force, you argue against all that "bad logic"

Take this post for instance. Your claim is a bunch of hot air and when you cant prove it you will deflect.

Hey, sorry guy, but you only get to win with the Kommunist Klown Kar word of the day contest once, you can't keep repeating the word and continuing to get rewarded.

Just kidding! Bodecea, pie in the face, LoneLaugher, seltzer down your pants! Well done, the word of the day twice! You're going to have to do laundry today, aren't you?

Dont get emotionally injured because you lack the intellect to stay with the point. If you concentrate hard and pay attention you may be able to discern whats going on and cease with your deflections. Good luck son.

OK, thanks dad. So dad, you think that arguing a double standard is an effective debating technique? Pointing out your double standard is just a deflection?

And we have a winner! OK, I said it, but you pulled it out of me, so, it's a pie in the face and seltzer for you, and here come Bodecea and LoneLaugher! Well done!

 

[kaz]

When will NaziCons learn that there's a difference between sounding smart and being smart?

I don't know, what's your thought on that, Adolph?

 

[Lakhota]

When will NaziCons learn that there's a difference between sounding smart and being smart?

I don't know, what's your thought on that, Adolph?

Really? You of all people should know!

 

[kaz]

Yep, personal responsibility, paying your own bills, giving charity by choice not force, you argue against all that "bad logic"

Reaalllly.

Links?

You do know what "links" means, right? I'm not asking for breakfast food.

You're challenging me to a golf match?

As you well know, you don't get to ask questions, you don't answer them. Well, technically you can ask them as you're a word parser, I just don't give a shit

When you answer questions, I'll give a shit when you ask them. This part is actually a serious reply.

This is another of his Klown parade--- pretend he was the one who asked the question, after himself making the assertion. :lame:

Wow, I'm disappointed, the word parser didn't read carefully. I did't say you didn't ask a perfectly valid question, I just said I'm not answering it since you don't answer my perfectly valid questions. you make snotty remarks that don't address anything. And you're not even funny like I am

OK that's long enough.

No links.
You failed.
You lose.

Ciao.

Wow, you really nail yourself with the links thing. So when you don't answer questions, you lose that fast? Wow, according to you, you really suck at debating

 

[Pogo]

Reaalllly.

Links?

You do know what "links" means, right? I'm not asking for breakfast food.

You're challenging me to a golf match?

As you well know, you don't get to ask questions, you don't answer them. Well, technically you can ask them as you're a word parser, I just don't give a shit

When you answer questions, I'll give a shit when you ask them. This part is actually a serious reply.

This is another of his Klown parade--- pretend he was the one who asked the question, after himself making the assertion. :lame:

Wow, I'm disappointed, the word parser didn't read carefully. I did't say you didn't ask a perfectly valid question, I just said I'm not answering it since you don't answer my perfectly valid questions. you make snotty remarks that don't address anything. And you're not even funny like I am

OK that's long enough.

No links.
You failed.
You lose.

Ciao.

Wow, you really nail yourself with the links thing. So when you don't answer questions, you lose that fast? Wow, according to you, you really suck at debating

This is another of his Klown parade--- pretend it was the one who asked the question, after itself making the assertion.

QED.

 

[kaz]

When will NaziCons learn that there's a difference between sounding smart and being smart?

I don't know, what's your thought on that, Adolph?

Really? You of all people should know!

Playground! OK, for you that's an improvement, you've been practicing rhetoric, haven't you? Wait until you get to transitive logic, that one's really cool. OK, its a ways off for you, but just a glimpse of what's coming

 

[kaz]

You're challenging me to a golf match?

As you well know, you don't get to ask questions, you don't answer them. Well, technically you can ask them as you're a word parser, I just don't give a shit

When you answer questions, I'll give a shit when you ask them. This part is actually a serious reply.

This is another of his Klown parade--- pretend he was the one who asked the question, after himself making the assertion. :lame:

Wow, I'm disappointed, the word parser didn't read carefully. I did't say you didn't ask a perfectly valid question, I just said I'm not answering it since you don't answer my perfectly valid questions. you make snotty remarks that don't address anything. And you're not even funny like I am

OK that's long enough.

No links.
You failed.
You lose.

Ciao.

Wow, you really nail yourself with the links thing. So when you don't answer questions, you lose that fast? Wow, according to you, you really suck at debating

This is another of his Klown parade--- pretend it was the one who asked the question, after itself making the assertion.

QED.

You used to be a better word parser. Now you pretty much suck at it

 

[Pogo]

 

[kaz]

 

[Lakhota]

When will NaziCons learn that there's a difference between sounding smart and being smart?

I don't know, what's your thought on that, Adolph?

Really? You of all people should know!

Playground! OK, for you that's an improvement, you've been practicing rhetoric, haven't you? Wait until you get to transitive logic, that one's really cool. OK, its a ways off for you, but just a glimpse of what's coming

Your Forrest Gump routine is hilarious!

 

[kaz]

When will NaziCons learn that there's a difference between sounding smart and being smart?

I don't know, what's your thought on that, Adolph?

Really? You of all people should know!

Playground! OK, for you that's an improvement, you've been practicing rhetoric, haven't you? Wait until you get to transitive logic, that one's really cool. OK, its a ways off for you, but just a glimpse of what's coming

Your Forrest Gump routine is hilarious!

So is your Beavis and Butthead routine.

Heh, heh heh. Conservatives are stupid, heh heh, hey, yeah, heh heh heh, they are, heh heh heh, they don't actually discuss issues like we do, heh heh heh, yeah, heh heh heh, like how, heh heh heh

 

[hortysir]

Oh please of Trump dressed up as a black guy for Halloween the entire left wing would shit themselves.

Why would they do that? Do you have proof?

UW-Stout students upset over blackface Halloween costume
Blackface” is a racist means of perpetuating stereotypes and misappropriations under the guise of entertainment.

Blackface Halloween: A Toxic Cultural Tradition
It’s already started this year, with the white elementary school teacher who dressed up as Kanye West. And the Florida teenager who thought it was a good idea to cover herself in shoe polish to pull off an authentic Nicki Minaj.

There's just two examples of liberal outrage over blackface.

Guess it's okay when someone that shares your demented PC views does it

Noticed your avi.....U.S.S. Ranger.

I was stationed on the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk CV 63.....the Shitty Kitty.

My dad was on Kitty in Nam, come to think about it

Then he may know about the racial incidents that happened. 1972 they had a big one while deployed. Racial Incident aboard USS Kitty Hawk (CV 63)

Can't ask him about it but he retired in 72 and was with the USS Topeka at the time (I think)

Good read, tho.
Thanks