Another win for the good guys!

[JoeMoma]

Yep. And I really thought I had finally found a topic we could all agree on.

But for too many politics trumps even T&A

I understand why dress codes are often different for women than they are for men.

 

[BackAgain]

While I enjoy the views, one has to wonder about sanitation regulations in a place that serves food products. I mean they have to wear gloves (and many places masks) to serve food but g-strings and pasties is OK? Sanity and common sense are dead in the world of today.

Hair coverings like hair nets for cooks. I wonder if g-strings are required for that same purpose?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

While I enjoy the views, one has to wonder about sanitation regulations in a place that serves food products. I mean they have to wear gloves (and many places masks) to serve food but g-strings and pasties is OK? Sanity and common sense are dead in the world of today.

They are serving coffee, not a hot breakfast

 

[DigitalDrifter]

I'll have a mocha delight!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

GG just erected

now you are having sexual fantasies about me?

What is with you folks and your sexual fantasies about people on this forum?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I understand why dress codes are often different for women than they are for men.

Free the titties!!!!

 

[BackAgain]

now you are having sexual fantasies about me?

What is with you folks and your sexual fantasies about people on this forum?

Nah. Nobody really believes your junk can pop up.

 

[Hum Dinger]

A woman's right to wear pasties & g-strings should depends on her age and weight!

 

[JoeMoma]

Free the titties!!!!

I like free titties, but some women have expensive titties.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

City ordered bikini baristas to cover up. That’s unconstitutional, WA judge rules

The judge found that the city’s dress code violated the U.S. and Washington State Constitution’s equal protection clause in the 14th Amendment.

www.yahoo.com

Bikini baristas in a Washington city were banned from wearing pasties and g-strings to work, and a U.S. district court ruled that it was unconstitutional.

The judgment centered on dress code laws the city of Everett passed in 2017, which the workers say clearly targeted the businesses where they worked.

U.S. District Judge Ricardo Martinez found the dress code, which required all “quick service facility” workers to wear shorts and T-shirts that would cover their midriffs, violates the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution as well as the Washington State Constitution’s 14th Amendment because it targets women’s clothing and not men’s.


Well done Judge Martinez!


If you are offended by what they are wearing, get your coffee somewhere else.

Limiting government authority in favor of individual liberty is a win worth celebrating.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Nah. Nobody really believes your junk can pop up.

And here you are, one more person on this forum thinking about my junk.

Just so bizarre

 

[BackAgain]

And here you are, one more person on this forum thinking about my junk.

Just so bizarre

I don’t think about your junk. I merely replied to a post.

You’re quite the narcissist.

 

[lg325]

Just a note: Just because I am against censorship I also would never go to such a place. Those type of places never stay in business long anyway.

 

[Votto]

City ordered bikini baristas to cover up. That’s unconstitutional, WA judge rules

The judge found that the city’s dress code violated the U.S. and Washington State Constitution’s equal protection clause in the 14th Amendment.

www.yahoo.com

Bikini baristas in a Washington city were banned from wearing pasties and g-strings to work, and a U.S. district court ruled that it was unconstitutional.

The judgment centered on dress code laws the city of Everett passed in 2017, which the workers say clearly targeted the businesses where they worked.

U.S. District Judge Ricardo Martinez found the dress code, which required all “quick service facility” workers to wear shorts and T-shirts that would cover their midriffs, violates the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution as well as the Washington State Constitution’s 14th Amendment because it targets women’s clothing and not men’s.


Well done Judge Martinez!


If you are offended by what they are wearing, get your coffee somewhere else.

That depends, what do the woman look like?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I don’t think about your junk. I merely replied to a post.

You’re quite the narcissist.

Dude, you brought it up, thus you were thinking about it.

Bit late to back track on it now

 

[BackAgain]

Dude, you brought it up, thus you were thinking about it.

Bit late to back track on it now

Again, you moron. It was a reply.

Get back to staring at yourself in a mirror, Narcissus.

 

[iceberg]

Weird how the MAGA morons see a thread about women in G-strings and pasties and instantly think of me wearing the same thing.

I guess we know which way they roll.

maybe it's all the pics you send out of you in that outfit.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Again, you moron. It was a reply.

Get back to staring at yourself in a mirror, Narcissus.

Yes, it was a reply where you brought up my junk even though it has nothing to do with the discussion.

 

[BackAgain]

Yes, it was a reply where you brought up my junk even though it has nothing to do with the discussion.

You’re fixated. And dull. But at least yiur repetitive and boring.

Tell us how you think you look in the mirror Narcissus.

 

[Concerned American]

They are serving coffee, not a hot breakfast

Do you ingest it?