BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
I hesitate a moment to post this. Yeah, it is in Zone 1. But even though the author of the piece I am linking and addressing is a black man, I suspect that commentary about this topic from a white man like me will he received poorly by some. Nevertheless, I think this view merits a little bit of attention. Itās not new. But it is interesting in several fronts and on a couple of levels:
www.washingtontimes.com
I see the name of āblack lives matterā as inherently problematical. I mean, of course Black Lives Matter. But that doesnāt mean other lives donāt. And any commentary about ALL lives matter is often attacked as beside the point. I donāt think it is beside the point.
However, BLM isnāt merely asserting the obvious (that Black Lives of course matter). It is also the name of a basically Marxist oriented interest group. It seeks to change our society not merely in terms of race as the name might suggest. But in all manner of radical ways. And itās focus (as the author of the piece Iāve linked has suggested) seems to trivialize the lives of black men as fathers.
Iām wondering who all thinks the author of the linked article is right (and how so?) and who believes he is wrong or misguided (and why and how?) and how his views correspond to reality?

Black Lives Matterās real agenda
Unless you have been āoff the gridā for a while, you have heard a lot in the news about Black Lives Matter. This āmovementā has gotten a lot of press and some notable praise from celebrities and politicians, including positive mentions from President Obama. But I suspect that most people...

I see the name of āblack lives matterā as inherently problematical. I mean, of course Black Lives Matter. But that doesnāt mean other lives donāt. And any commentary about ALL lives matter is often attacked as beside the point. I donāt think it is beside the point.
However, BLM isnāt merely asserting the obvious (that Black Lives of course matter). It is also the name of a basically Marxist oriented interest group. It seeks to change our society not merely in terms of race as the name might suggest. But in all manner of radical ways. And itās focus (as the author of the piece Iāve linked has suggested) seems to trivialize the lives of black men as fathers.
Iām wondering who all thinks the author of the linked article is right (and how so?) and who believes he is wrong or misguided (and why and how?) and how his views correspond to reality?
Last edited: