Another Reason To Drop-Kick Joe Into Grand Canyon

Billy_Kinetta

Paladin of the Lost Hour
Mar 4, 2013
52,766
22,197
2,320
You didn’t expect him to understand the things he is supposedly backing did you? His “handlers” tell him this is good. Then “they“ look at the numbers. if it looks like the poll numbers are good ”they” tell him to stick with it, if the numbers are bad then reverse course. The whole problem is people want to believe that they are voting for an Alzheimer’s fellow but they are actually voting for his handlers while having no idea who “they” are.
 
He'll sign whatever they tell him to.

The PRO Act’s main provisions serve the interests of union officials at the expense of actual workers. For example, the legislation would immediately eliminate “right-to-work” laws nationwide. Currently in effect in 28 states, these laws ensure that no workers are required to pay union fees or be members of a union in order to do their job.

That's awesome. Right to Work laws suck. They allow the slackers to get all the benefits of unions without having to contribute.
 
Has joe proposed anything that is actually constitutional?
He cant just eliminate states right to work laws.
 
He'll sign whatever they tell him to.

The PRO Act’s main provisions serve the interests of union officials at the expense of actual workers. For example, the legislation would immediately eliminate “right-to-work” laws nationwide. Currently in effect in 28 states, these laws ensure that no workers are required to pay union fees or be members of a union in order to do their job.

That's awesome. Right to Work laws suck. They allow the slackers to get all the benefits of unions without having to contribute.
And the statist shows up. How quaint.
 
Plugs will try to read anything they put on the teleprompter. As long as the words aren't too big.

Can't wait for the first debate. That look of abject terror and screaming for mommy (Jill) will put an end to this nonsense. There wont be any second or third debates.
 

Forum List

Back
Top