Fenton Lum
Gold Member
- May 7, 2016
- 22,735
- 1,442
- 265
- Banned
- #121
Other laws don't hinder the ability of citizen's to defend themselves.Thinking that a ban on assault weapons would somehow get them out of the hands of criminals, who by definition don't follow the law, is not common sense, it's lack thereof. The government in question would only be weakening the ability of citizens to defend themselves, while criminals would continue being able to use them. We've already had MANY stupid threads like this.Police around the nation have for years begged for assault weapons like those used in Dallas to be taken off the streets. They're overwhelmed.
If you claim to support the police, why not support them by supporting common sense regulation of these weapons and clips, etc?
We don't take that approach legally to any other issue relative to the law do we, not one.
Neither would this one done properly, you have never defended yourself with a gun, much less an assault style weapon. You need home protection? Shot gun, covered, and much better.
Not really. Many woman and people of small stature have a hard time with shot guns. My Mother and Wife being a couple who cant manage them. An AR15 on the other hand they can manage. I have defended my self with a gun. .556 does nasty things to flesh.
Yeah? Guns do nasty things to flesh? Good to know, thanks. A)xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, B) stupid choice for home defense.
Last edited by a moderator: