Another illegal alien kills an American citizen.

It allowed 7,000 illegal crossings daily and only after that happened ICE could respond. Plus they weren’t required to respond. Just authorized to respond.

The only ass getting kicked here is yours.
No, it did not.
There’s no legislation or executive policy from the Biden administration that explicitly permits 7,000 illegal crossings per day before ICE can respond. However, I can help clarify where that number might be coming from and what the actual policy landscape looks like.


🔍 What’s true and what’s not:


  • In June 2024, President Biden issued an executive order allowing the government to temporarily suspend asylum processing if illegal crossings exceeded 2,500 per day over a seven-day average.
  • This threshold was part of a broader effort to curb surges at the border, not to allow crossings. If crossings dropped below 1,500 per day, normal asylum processing would resume.
  • The 7,000 figure may stem from border encounter statistics, not policy. For example, in September 2023, illegal crossings reportedly exceeded 260,000 for the month, which averages to over 8,000 per day—but that’s descriptive, not prescriptive.
🚨 ICE’s role:
  • ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) has faced resource constraints due to high volumes of border encounters. Some ICE officers were reportedly redirected from interior enforcement to help process new arrivals.
  • This shift doesn’t mean ICE is only allowed to act after a certain number of crossings—it reflects operational strain, not legal limits.
 
No, it did not.
There’s no legislation or executive policy from the Biden administration that explicitly permits 7,000 illegal crossings per day before ICE can respond. However, I can help clarify where that number might be coming from and what the actual policy landscape looks like.


🔍 What’s true and what’s not:


  • In June 2024, President Biden issued an executive order allowing the government to temporarily suspend asylum processing if illegal crossings exceeded 2,500 per day over a seven-day average.
  • This threshold was part of a broader effort to curb surges at the border, not to allow crossings. If crossings dropped below 1,500 per day, normal asylum processing would resume.
  • The 7,000 figure may stem from border encounter statistics, not policy. For example, in September 2023, illegal crossings reportedly exceeded 260,000 for the month, which averages to over 8,000 per day—but that’s descriptive, not prescriptive.
🚨 ICE’s role:
  • ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) has faced resource constraints due to high volumes of border encounters. Some ICE officers were reportedly redirected from interior enforcement to help process new arrivals.
  • This shift doesn’t mean ICE is only allowed to act after a certain number of crossings—it reflects operational strain, not legal limits.
No, it did not.
There’s no legislation or executive policy from the Biden administration that explicitly permits 7,000 illegal crossings per day before ICE can respond. However, I can help clarify where that number might be coming from and what the actual policy landscape looks like.


🔍 What’s true and what’s not:


  • In June 2024, President Biden issued an executive order allowing the government to temporarily suspend asylum processing if illegal crossings exceeded 2,500 per day over a seven-day average.
  • This threshold was part of a broader effort to curb surges at the border, not to allow crossings. If crossings dropped below 1,500 per day, normal asylum processing would resume.
  • The 7,000 figure may stem from border encounter statistics, not policy. For example, in September 2023, illegal crossings reportedly exceeded 260,000 for the month, which averages to over 8,000 per day—but that’s descriptive, not prescriptive.
🚨 ICE’s role:
  • ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) has faced resource constraints due to high volumes of border encounters. Some ICE officers were reportedly redirected from interior enforcement to help process new arrivals.
  • This shift doesn’t mean ICE is only allowed to act after a certain number of crossings—it reflects operational strain, not legal limits.
I’m sorry. It only allowed 5,000 a day. My mistake.
 
How long will the left tolerate this? Will they ever come around to support apprehending these people and deporting them before they kill someone or rape a child?

Don't be silly; this sort of chaos and mayhem is exactly what they are aiming for with their open borders scam.
 
Strange that you're not moving to El Salvador or Venezuela.

Yes, for some reason those paradises don't seem to be much of a draw for the commies and deviants. They stay here while claiming all these white people suck n stuff.
 
Yes, for some reason those paradises don't seem to be much of a draw for the commies and deviants. They stay here while claiming all these white people suck n stuff.
1752414245532.webp
 

OH NOES!!! NATZEES!!!

Must suck to be among the culturally defunct brown masses and have to face the fact that than even dumb whites do better than most brown people. Most native tribes wouldn't exist today without whites rescuing them from extinction by their fellow indians, eh? You should be paying us reparations.

In any case, we found out long ago that those running around waving Nazi flags were just leftists and commies faking it for the photo ops and their media's staged agit prop.
 
Nope, Picaro.

You see, we still live in a nation of laws where you have to prove your case. You can spout any inanity you want, but when it comes to proving it in a court of law, it is another matter.

You don't like Nazis, then don't be one.
 
Nope, Picaro.

You see, we still live in a nation of laws where you have to prove your case. You can spout any inanity you want, but when it comes to proving it in a court of law, it is another matter.

You don't like Nazis, then don't be one.

Ah, more strawmen; too bad you only parrot the usual rubbish, lacking any real stuff to babble about. lol at you pretending to care about laws. No Democrat cares about laws.
 
... which hurt you nada.
Yes it did. Illegals take up scarce housing, they overcrowd apartments, use water, power, overcrowd schools and hospitals, overtax sewage systems, drive down wages for both LEGAL immigrants and native born poor and import diseases we had eradicated with them.
 
But every single crime they commit, is one that wouldn’t have happened if they weren’t in the country.

Mostly they just go unreported to police, and of course that is not the same thing as Slow's fake news. Illegals don't report crimes, and neither do barrio dwellers in general. The police have to drive up on bodies left in the streets to see where a crime was committed, or catch one in progress.
 
Yes it did. Illegals take up scarce housing, they overcrowd apartments, use water, power, overcrowd schools and hospitals, overtax sewage systems, drive down wages for both LEGAL immigrants and native born poor and import diseases we had eradicated with them.

sources, please. The commit fewer crimes per capita, and they are as well vaxxed or better than Americans.

Sources, please.
 
Mostly they just go unreported to police, and of course that is not the same thing as Slow's fake news. Illegals don't report crimes, and neither do barrio dwellers in general. The police have to drive up on bodies left in the streets to see where a crime was committed, or catch one in progress.
Sources, please.
 
15th post
You are merely mumbling, picaro.

Americans are more likely to targets of crime by Americans not alien immigrants.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom