Another example of climate models being wrong

[sealybobo]

Ding is actually an employee of the Co2 FRAUD, a "faux skeptic" here to keep idiots accepting FUDGE as real.

Data does matter.

There is no data that supports the theory.

Only fudge.

And that is why the Earth climate DATA still reads precisely

NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT in Cane Activity
NO OCEAN RISE

Majorie Taylor Green disagrees. So does NASA

 

[Crick]

Majorie Taylor Green disagrees. So does NASA

Wow, them's some strange bedfellows.

 

[jc456]

Did you ever get any school’n ?

irony

 

[Dagosa]

irony

School’n didn’t help that response.

 

[Dagosa]

Ding is actually an employee of the Co2 FRAUD, a "faux skeptic" here to keep idiots accepting FUDGE as real.

Data does matter.

There is no data that supports the theory.

Only fudge.

And that is why the Earth climate DATA still reads precisely

NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the OCEANS
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT in Cane Activity
NO OCEAN RISE

You keep referring to “ data”, and produce nothing.

 

[jc456]

School’n didn’t help that response.

Irony squared

 

[Dagosa]

Irony squared

Finally. You capitalized “ irony”.

 

[jc456]

Finally. You capitalized “ irony”.

App did

 

[EMH]

Majorie Taylor Green disagrees. So does NASA

LOL!!!

Parrot is as parrot does....

What did the ACTUAL DATA say?

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Translation from NBC = for more than three decades of rising Co2 in the atmosphere, the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere...


All the Co2 FRAUD has is FUDGE. It takes an absolute moron to believe it.

 

[ding]

So does NASA

 

[EMH]

The Co2 FRAUD has a fudge video for all of their bs.

The most hilarious are the McBullshit tectonic plate movement... where Antarctica has stayed on the south pole for the past 90 million years.... but SA did not, meaning the fault just "halted" somewhere, except the bottom of the ocean doesn't show anything like that....

The lies of Milankovich Cycles aka McBullshit - where was land mass Antarctica 70 million years ago

McBullshit claims Antarctica has been on the South Pole forever, it never moved at all. And, while it is on the South Pole, it has rapidly gone from ice age to tropical paradise and back over and over.... a Dennis Quaid theory for sure... We know that Antarctica has 70 million year old...

www.usmessageboard.com

Ocean currents very much do affect WEATHER.

Ocean currents have precisely ZERO EFFECT on CLIMATE, they never change Earth heat content, they just spread it around.

 

[Dagosa]

LOL!!!

Parrot is as parrot does....

What did the ACTUAL DATA say?

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Translation from NBC = for more than three decades of rising Co2 in the atmosphere, the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere...


All the Co2 FRAUD has is FUDGE. It takes an absolute moron to believe it.

You keep posting this article that says the opposite of what ever you’re trying to say. You bozos can’t fking read can you ? It actually says that your claim the data is wrong as YOUR analysis is faulty….Why do you keep posting stupid shit ?

 

[EMH]

You keep posting this article that says the opposite of what ever you’re trying to say. You bozos can’t fking read can you ? It actually says that your claim the data is wrong as YOUR analysis is faulty….Why do you keep posting stupid shit ?

You are TOO STUPID to understand the difference between DATA and FUDGE, a necessary characteristic for being DUMB ENOUGH to believe the Co2 FRAUD.

 

[sealybobo]

LOL!!!

Parrot is as parrot does....

What did the ACTUAL DATA say?

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Translation from NBC = for more than three decades of rising Co2 in the atmosphere, the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere...


All the Co2 FRAUD has is FUDGE. It takes an absolute moron to believe it.

Majorie Taylor Green says this doesn't matter. They use lasers.

So your Co2 schtick is irrelevant

 

[Dagosa]

You keep posting this article that says the opposite of what ever you’re trying to say. You bozos can’t fking read can you ? It actually says that your claim the data is wrong as YOUR analysis is faulty….Why do you keep posting stupid shit ?

You are TOO STUPID to understand the difference between DATA and FUDGE, a necessary characteristic for being DUMB ENOUGH to believe the Co2 FRAUD.

Where is the word “ fudged” used. If you could read, you’d see the analysis of the data by you denier idiots was wrong, not the data idiot. The entire article debases your made up shit. But keep posting it. Every time you do it drives your intellect deeper into the abyss of stupidity.

 

[Crick]

Why do you [EMH] keep posting stupid shit ?

You've got three guesses but the first two don't count. ; - )

 

[Dagosa]

You've got three guesses but the first two don't count. ; - )

For attention.

 

[EMH]

Majorie Taylor Green says this doesn't matter. They use lasers.

So your Co2 schtick is irrelevant

Data is irrelevant

Only parroting of compromised left wing liars matters.... to sealy bobo.

 

[EMH]

Where is the word “ fudged” used. If you could read, you’d see the analysis of the data by you denier idiots was wrong, not the data idiot. The entire article debases your made up shit. But keep posting it. Every time you do it drives your intellect deeper into the abyss of stupidity.

NBC is a bit slanted in the coverage of the climate. And you have an IQ under 5...

FUDGE is NOT WHAT THE INSTRUMENTS RECORDED, it is what the politicized liars behind the Co2 FRAUD did to it to get to claim "warming" that DOES NOT EXIST

 

[EMH]

You've got three guesses but the first two don't count. ; - )

STill not up for a discussion as to WHY the Arctic Circle is 50F warmer than the Antarctic..... typical intellectually inferior Co2 FRAUD sponsored COWARD