Another drug running boat obliterated by our military on 10/14/2025.

[RetiredGySgt]

Look it up, yourself.

so, you didn't say anything as I suspected.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/115373751811822463

One moment the six narcoterrorists were minding their own illegal business and one instant later they were blown to pieces.

If this keeps happening, pretty soon some of the narcoterrorists may start to consider this job they do as being just a bit too risky.

Another boat of civilians, murdered.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I am on record (previous post) they are going to carry human shields (Children and/or women) and dare them to strike that. IF they take out a boat with kids or women hotages?........then Congress Stain are going to go more ballistic with impeachment talk and jail time for President Trump? It will be another huge STAIN mess.

Well, it IS illegal, what he is doing.


But his corrupt court gave him immunity.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

They took up arms against the USA to you, that is heroic, we know.

the 16-year-old did no such thing and if you don't mind extra-legal killing by Obama why all of a sudden does it matter because Trump is doing it?

 

[BackAgain]

Another boat of civilians, murdered.

Nope.

Another bunch of criminals and narcoterrorists removed forever from the board.

 

[White 6]

Have you looked at these boats? They are not racing, and they are not pleasure craft. Their entire purpose is to carry drugs. They KNOW they are carrying drugs. They probably know the identities of everyone on board, just like we did. The gloves have come off! They are being treated as pirates, just like in the old days. They are criminals and are fleeing authority. If they do not stop, they can be destroyed.

Did you see anything showing they were ordered to stop, even in international waters?
I am aware, the coast guard does, in fact stop, board and search boats, in our coastal waters, possibly even to the extent of economic zone waters. If somebody refused to stop, I could easily understand putting enough bullets into the boat to stop it, but generally that still leave enough boat to search and maybe even a suspect. I have no problem with that. This ain't that. Bullets are cheap. No missiles I have fired were ever cheap. The goal of the missile, is pretty much to make evidence recovery close to impossible. If you get blown up, at sea, who is to say, what happened or why? This isn't what we are about and definitely against maritime law, the way the government is showing it.

 

[White 6]

so, you didn't say anything as I suspected.

What will you pay me, by the hour for the research time. Mind you, I was noted for being very good on researching subjects, so I'm well worth it.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Did you see anything showing they were ordered to stop, even in international waters?
I am aware, the coast guard does, in fact stop, board and search boats, in our coastal waters, possibly even to the extent of economic zone waters. If somebody refused to stop, I could easily understand putting enough bullets into the boat to stop it, but generally that still leave enough boat to search and maybe even a suspect. I have no problem with that. This ain't that. Bullets are cheap. No missiles I have fired were ever cheap. The goal of the missile, is pretty much to make evidence recovery close to impossible. If you get blown up, at sea, who is to say, what happened or why? This isn't what we are about and definitely against maritime law, the way the government is showing it.

Bullshit. The goal of the missile is to destroy the target immediately.

You need help. Please seek it! You brain is no longer functional.

 

[Magnus]

You should tell me, how it feels to be an American hating asshole. You are the one that no longer asks for proof of wrongdoing, before supporting the new government right to murder people in international waters, using the US Military, with no declared war, and no proof of resistance or even wrong doing. Not exactly an American value. What if they blew up you and your house, killing all, leaving no witness, never knocking on your door, simply air to ground missiles from above, stating you were a drug dealer and deserved it? Summary legal judgment and execution without trial or presenting evidence is now an American value?
I don't think so.

Funny how this feels like Iraq all over again. Back then, questioning Bush meant you were a traitor. Then Trump trashed Bush, and suddenly Iraq was a mistake. Now Trump bombs Venezuelan boats without any proof and the same crowd cheers him on without question. The flip-flopping is wild.

 

[White 6]

Bullshit. The goal of the missile is to destroy the target immediately.

You need help. Please seek it! You brain is no longer functional.

You just believe anything you are told by the government and accept anything you are not told by the government. Having been on the other side of the equation (shit you were not told by the government), I believe little or nothing at face value, and with damned good reason. I guess you believe Oswald was the lone gunman, too, right?

 

[DonGlock26]

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/115373751811822463

One moment the six narcoterrorists were minding their own illegal business and one instant later they were blown to pieces.

If this keeps happening, pretty soon some of the narcoterrorists may start to consider this job they do as being just a bit too risky.

Oh no.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

You just believe anything you are told by the government and accept anything you are not told by the government. Having been on the other side of the equation (shit you were not told by the government), I believe little or nothing at face value, and with damned good reason. I guess you believe Oswald was the lone gunman, too, right?

How about I believe because I worked for that same government and I have actually conducted these anti-drug ops? What is your experience? What roast of coffee did the general prefer? Cream? Sugar?

Nice deflection. You always do that when you are cornered.

There are many details of those operations which I am not at liberty to discuss for obvious reasons.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nope

Yep. Civilians targeted by our military. Sad. Just Hamas, but with orange makeup and a suit.

 

[White 6]

How about I believe because I worked for that same government and I have actually conducted these anti-drug ops? What is your experience? What roast of coffee did the general prefer? Cream? Sugar?

Nice deflection. You always do that when you are cornered.

There are many details of those operations which I am not at liberty to discuss for obvious reasons.

There are many details of those operations which I am not at liberty to discuss for obvious reasons."
And some classified for not always the best of reasons, the ones where somebody showed up to have you sign, you have no knowledge of an incident, discussion is not authorized and you are aware of the classification of the information, report or incident.

Oh, and no, I was never involved in drug interdiction operations.

 

[BackAgain]

Yep. Civilians targeted by our military. Sad. Just Hamas, but with orange makeup and a suit.

Nope. Narcoterrorists targeted by our military — at long last

Very good news.

Finally, a President who seeks peace and gets results but who is willing to treat our actual enemies as actual enemies.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nope. Narcoterrorists targeted by our military — at long last

I don't need you to parrot the lie. I can get it from the tap. But thanks.

 

[BackAgain]

I don't need tou to parrot the lie. I can get it from the tap. But thanks.

I don’t need you to make up shit like “murder of civilians” when you couldn’t support that lie of yours under any circumstances.

I’m always pleased to try to educate you goobers. But it remains very much like talking to a rock.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

don’t need you to make up shit like “murder of civilians” when you couldn’t support that lie of yours under any circumstances.

And you couldn't support the lie you obediently parrot under any circumstances.

So you see the problem, here.

 

[BackAgain]

And you couldn't support the lie you obediently parrot under any circumstances.

So you see the problem, here.

I don’t have any need of the intel and I’m under no obligation to prove it to you or anyone else.

The real problem you’re crying over is that I am willing to believe that we (our intel community) knows full well who these guys are (now I should say who they were) and what they are (were) carrying and their routes.

You are unwilling to believe it. Ok. But you state your disbelief as though it was a statement of “fact.” It isn’t.

Hopefully, at last, you get the first glimmer of seeing what the actual problem is.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I don’t have any need of the intel and I’m under no obligation to prove it to you or anyone else.

I.E., you have no need for a shred of evidence.

Which is an odd admission, after chastising others for having no evidence.

The point has been made.

All you can do is shout and get mad. Because you have no evidence. So anyone who says it was a boat of civilians is just as right as you could ever be.

See the problem?

I know you do.