Another drug running boat obliterated by our military on 10/14/2025.

[White 6]

they aren't noncombatants they have been designated as irregular combatants

How convenient.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

How convenient.
View attachment 1173684

we have been killing terrorists without trial or capture for how long now? Did you complain about that too? These are terrorists killing American citizens same as if with a firearm or bomb.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Open range, on the open water, any government, anywhere, no questions asked, huh?

Sorry... your response makes no sense, given my post.

 

[White 6]

I think about the lives being saved with the poison they are delivering.
Out of the hands of the children and young adults.

What poison? Did they finally come up with any evidence?

 

[M14 Shooter]

What poison? Did they finally come up with any evidence?

You're confusing not releasing evidence to the public with not having evidence.

 

[Moonglow]

The president can kill his way into not getting a Nobel Peace Prize in 2026.

 

[Meister]

What poison? Did they finally come up with any evidence?

Whatever, White. I guess everything needs to go through you and Fritz before they
move forward.

 

[struth]

What poison? Did they finally come up with any evidence?

The evidence that they were ID'd as drug runners, and are terminated.

Pretty straight forward.

Do you have any evidence contradicting the Govts?

If not, sit down,

 

[HikerGuy83]

You cannot fire on civilian non-combatants.

Why are Pelosi and Schiff screaming about impeachment.

If this was strictly arbitrary, they might get him.

I don't hear anyone in congress saying much about this.

 

[HikerGuy83]

You cannot fire on civilian non-combatants.

Recommendation: Don't take a boating excursion off the coast of Ven.

 

[White 6]

you didnt mind when Obama was killing people that happened to be US citizens including a 16 year old.

It was unfortunate the son of Anwar al-Awlaki (a prominent al-Qaeda leader, killed by drone strike two weeks before, was in the wrong place at the wrong time, during the drone strike on Ibrahim al-Banna, a senior al-Qaeda operative.

I confess, I lost little sleep over it.

 

[HikerGuy83]

How convenient.
View attachment 1173684

They've been warned.

 

[White 6]

Because no one has ever been wrongfully convicted of anything. And no one has ever gotten off when guilty?

Sometimes it sucks, even when they follow the normal rules, doesn't it?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

It was unfortunate the son of Anwar al-Awlaki (a prominent al-Qaeda leader, killed by drone strike two weeks before, was in the wrong place at the wrong time, during the drone strike on Ibrahim al-Banna, a senior al-Qaeda operative.

I confess, I lost little sleep over it.

But now you think killing terrorists is wrong? Just cause the President is someone you don't like? Go figure retard.

 

[OldFlame]

Sometimes it sucks, even when they follow the normal rules, doesn't it?

That wasn't the point, dummy.

 

[OldFlame]

So Trump is wrong to designate the drug cartels as terrorists?

No answer?

 

[Meathead]

Look it up, starting with the week after biden opened the floodgates, with no numbers expected, no plans on how to handle the flow, and after he started the midnight planes of undocumented in to cities in the dead of night, sometime to airports, not even usually open in the middle of the night.

A rare moment of fleeting lucidity, I'm sure.

 

[White 6]

Why are Pelosi and Schiff screaming about impeachment.

If this was strictly arbitrary, they might get him.

I don't hear anyone in congress saying much about this.

Too stupid to have not read the Supreme Court decision, that basically says anything the pres does as a matter of national policy is above the law, no matter what he decides to do, not to mention, both houses are controlled by Republicans, so there will be no impeachment, making it out of the House, much less a conviction in the Senate. Maybe they were thinking of the old days, when nobody was above the law.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Too stupid to have not read the Supreme Court decision, that basically says anything the pres does as a matter of national policy is above the law, no matter what he decides to do, not to mention, both houses are controlled by Republicans, so there will be no impeachment, making it out of the House, much less a conviction in the Senate. Maybe they were thinking of the old days, when nobody was above the law.

I guess I didn't see the decision covering this kind of thing.

And the SCOTUS can't override an impeachment vote.

Is anyone even discussing it? Not that I've seen. But I am not looking all that hard.

Not making it out of the house doesn't mean some idiot like AOC can't call for it.

 

[BackAgain]

Too stupid to have not read the Supreme Court decision, that basically says anything the pres does as a matter of national policy is above the law, no matter what he decides to do, not to mention, both houses are controlled by Republicans, so there will be no impeachment, making it out of the House, much less a conviction in the Senate. Maybe they were thinking of the old days, when nobody was above the law.

Once again, that’s not what the SCOTUS decision actually said.

You’d be better off employing a few modifiers when making such blanket claims.

“Under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of presidential power entitles a former president to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court.

My emphasis.