Faulty generalization
Since this is the umpteenth topic where a faux conservative has provided an example of fraud which could not be prevented or stopped by Voter ID as evidence we need Voter ID, one could ask if there is a non-retarded faux conservative walking the Earth...
Federal LAW requires that all voters prove citizenship and that they live where they say they do. Yet the registration of people while obtaining drivers licenses does not require the proof of citizenship at all.
Bullshit. It requires a birth certificate.
Further the left opposes culling the rolls as is ACTUALLY required by FEDERAL LAW.
More bullshit. What is opposed is
improper culling of the rolls. Even a Florida Republican county commissioner in charge of purging the rolls called a halt to it when it was found eligible citizens were being purged.
When a WWII veteran was improperly purged, how come Fox News and Breitbart and the Washington Times weren't all over it? Hmmmm...
And as I recollect you have opposed culling rolls too.
The voices in your head are working overtime. I have never said any such thing. I fully support the
proper maintenance of voter registration rolls. I have said THAT many times, always italicizing the word
proper. I have advocated a plan of action which would automatically remove people from voter registation rolls when they die or move.
But instead of spending all their time and focus on plans which would actually work, the retards go on and on and on and on and on and on and on about Voter ID, which is almost completely ineffective at preventing or stopping fraud.
To this day, NO ONE has EVER provided a single example of ACTUAL fraud which would have prevented or stopped fraud better than what I just suggested.
Instead, we get topic after topic after topic after topics like this one where some retard ballyhoos about an actual fraud which Voter ID could not possibly prevent as evidence of the need for Voter ID.
Jesus H. Christ, when will you ******* idiots figure this out?!?!