It is a "lawful" use of purchases and services. Why don't we list what "everyone" lawfully purchases or uses, according to name and address? It is a silly question. It is to illustrate the point that notifying criminals of where "guns" are (or aren't) could endanger people and property. If the criminals know who doesn't have guns, aren't they more likely to "target" those homes, over homes that do have guns (unless, they want guns to commit crimes, and are not prosecuted according to gun laws on the books). If you have daughters (or "little" boys) and you do not have a "dot" on your house, I would recommend that you do some extra work to protect your family.
Ann Coulter: Why Can't We Get A List Of Women Who Have Abortions?
- Thread starter ShootSpeeders
- Start date
It is a "lawful" use of purchases and services. Why don't we list what "everyone" lawfully purchases or uses, according to name and address? It is a silly question. It is to illustrate the point that notifying criminals of where "guns" are (or aren't) could endanger people and property. If the criminals know who doesn't have guns, aren't they more likely to "target" those homes, over homes that do have guns (unless, they want guns to commit crimes, and are not prosecuted according to gun laws on the books). If you have daughters (or "little" boys) and you do not have a "dot" on your house, I would recommend that you do some extra work to protect your family.
vile ugly thing, isn't she? can you imagine if a democrat had wished for a republican presidential candidate to be killed in a terrorist attack?
they'd still be posting a dozen threads a day about it....
but mostly, someone needs to talk to the coultergeist about HIPPA
Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule
Liberal newsman calls for killing of NRA members, drag GOP leaders behind trucks - Wilmington Conservative | Examiner.com
Still waiting for the libs to speak out against this..........
funny how you only think the right to restrict behavior only applies to government's power over women's bodies.
but health insurance? airline safety? oh hell no!! cause those affect you!
Not wanting to support the murder of unborn children is not using gov't power over women's bodies. Women are "free" to kill their unborn children any time they want (and there are methods that do not need a doctor). The taxpayer should not be "forced" to pay for this EVIL practice.
Yeah, in this atmosphere of ENVY that the President is promoting.... hold your breath.
Ernie S.
Diamond Member
So why is your right to privacy any more important than mine?
ShootSpeeders
Gold Member
- May 13, 2012
- 20,232
- 2,418
- 280
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #126
We're for small federal govt. The constitution never mentions or implies abortion so by the 10A it's a state issue.
ShootSpeeders
Gold Member
- May 13, 2012
- 20,232
- 2,418
- 280
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #127
A lot of people believe that. She does have a lot of masculine traits such as height and deep voice and big hands.
earlycuyler
Extra long Bad Ass Cut.
Adams apple to. We need a volunteer to check for a coin slot. Think it could be found with a Google search ?
Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,106
- 245
funny how you only think the right to restrict behavior only applies to government's power over women's bodies.
but health insurance? airline safety? oh hell no!! cause those affect you!
Funny how you can't actually prove that, yet you say it every chance you get.
jillian
Princess
funny how you only think the right to restrict behavior only applies to government's power over women's bodies.
but health insurance? airline safety? oh hell no!! cause those affect you!
Funny how you can't actually prove that, yet you say it every chance you get.
Prove what? That you're a pretend libertarian who thinks government should force women to carry pregnancies to term???
Why would I have to prove the obvious?
Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,106
- 245
funny how you only think the right to restrict behavior only applies to government's power over women's bodies.
but health insurance? airline safety? oh hell no!! cause those affect you!
Funny how you can't actually prove that, yet you say it every chance you get.
Prove what? That you're a pretend libertarian who thinks government should force women to carry pregnancies to term???
Why would I have to prove the obvious?
Feel free to point out where I say that government should force people to do anything, including not kill themselves. I bet you can't find a single post that even comes close. I don't like abortion, I also don't like cranberries, I have never demanded that the government protect me from either.
Plasmaball
Gold Member
- Sep 9, 2010
- 20,629
- 2,195
- 175
this is just stupid. You people will cling to anything to protect this stupid tool.
I seriously don't give a shit if you have a gun or what gun you own, but you are damn right you need to have background checks for them, and on some of them you should be registered period.
You don't like it? Tough ******* shit. nothing in this life is free, not even owning a gun.
Plasmaball
Gold Member
- Sep 9, 2010
- 20,629
- 2,195
- 175
funny how you only think the right to restrict behavior only applies to government's power over women's bodies.
but health insurance? airline safety? oh hell no!! cause those affect you!
Not wanting to support the murder of unborn children is not using gov't power over women's bodies. Women are "free" to kill their unborn children any time they want (and there are methods that do not need a doctor). The taxpayer should not be "forced" to pay for this EVIL practice.
nobody hasnt said you have to support it. Its when you make laws that counter that is where people get into trouble.
Shrug.
FJO
Gold Member
Obviously, your mother was too stupid to abort you.
FJO
Gold Member
Check out the Adam's apple on Karen Finney, a frequent guest on many MSNBC shows.
Are you really failing to use your "ability to reason" to this extent? How about if all drivers' licenses are published, completely (including name, address, license number, and picture)? How safe do you think people would be?
How about if we publish all the people that spent over $1000 in jewelry in the past year?
How about if we publish all the people that bought 4 wheelers, jet skis, motorcycles, or other expensive toys?
Most of those things require "background checks" (credit ratings), it should be public knowledge, right?
This discussion is not about "registration" (a Nazi principal); it is about lawful citizens being outed for a newspaper's "agenda".
The news papers did not list those DUI drivers in the counties, it did not list the pedophiles living in the counties, it did not list the burglars living in the counties, it did not list the rapists in the counties, it did not list those arrested for assault or battery in the counties. Yet, when questioned on why it did this, the people at the paper claimed it was for public safety. It made everyone less safe in those counties: those without "registered" guns will be targeted because chances are...no guns, those with "registered" guns will have small armies invading their homes (hope they have an assault rifle), for the guns. Yet those that choose not to "reason" want to pretend that "guns" are the reason for crime.
Lack of Christian values is the reason for crime in this country, but that is not "politically correct" to say, let alone, use in a discussion. So just go ahead and pretend that a piece of metal with plastic or wood attached is dangerous, all by itself. Keep promoting fatherless children that get no religious instruction. Keep voting for corruption. Vote to be a subject. Vote to have others' freedoms removed (right to private property and a means to defend it). Who will you turn to when you are informed that you are now a slave, and that this bureaucrat is now your "master", and if you don't do as you are told, all life support will be removed from your family and you? What choice will you have? Will you ever consider, that you, "you" voted for this, and voted to have everyone else enslaved, alongside you? Or will you just be glad to see those that reached for glory or success, ruined and broken?
funny how you only think the right to restrict behavior only applies to government's power over women's bodies.
but health insurance? airline safety? oh hell no!! cause those affect you!
Not wanting to support the murder of unborn children is not using gov't power over women's bodies. Women are "free" to kill their unborn children any time they want (and there are methods that do not need a doctor). The taxpayer should not be "forced" to pay for this EVIL practice.
nobody hasnt said you have to support it. Its when you make laws that counter that is where people get into trouble.
Shrug.
"My" tax dollars help fund abortions. That is supporting it (here we go with that ability to reason, again). The laws (some of which have not been written) in Obamacare "force" every single taxpayer to fund women's birth control and support abortions. You were saying...... ?
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Why should Coulter be immune from personal attacks? Personal attacks are a core component of her act.
Straw hump back scare crow Ann just want to sell another book.
Ann Coulter, the right wing's dial-900 girl—a rail-thin, chain-smoking, hard-drinking, big-eyed leggy blonde who winkingly serves up X-rated ideological smut on liberals—is at it again. "Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy," Coulter writes—or sneers—in Treason, her follow-up effort to the best-selling Slander. Like its predecessor, Treason sits atop the best-seller charts, riding higher than one of Coulter's signature miniskirts.
http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/books/2003/07/a_vast_rightwing_cry_of_treason.html
Ann Coulter, the right wing's dial-900 girl—a rail-thin, chain-smoking, hard-drinking, big-eyed leggy blonde who winkingly serves up X-rated ideological smut on liberals—is at it again. "Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy," Coulter writes—or sneers—in Treason, her follow-up effort to the best-selling Slander. Like its predecessor, Treason sits atop the best-seller charts, riding higher than one of Coulter's signature miniskirts.
http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/books/2003/07/a_vast_rightwing_cry_of_treason.html
Last edited:
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Republicans Blame Redistricting Fiasco On Everyone _ Except Trump- Started by skews13
- Replies: 3
-
-
War has changed, don't expect big WW2 style attacks any longer.- Started by Invisibleflash
- Replies: 2
-
REMINDER: The ONLY Elected Officials Shot and Murdered in the Last Decade were Democrats- Started by citygator
- Replies: 14
-
