Ann Coulter nails it...

[koshergrl]

It has absolutely nothing to do with this topic. It refers to SSI.

 

[JoeB131]

"Mental illness was blindingly clear in the cases of Seung-Hui Cho (Virginia Tech), Maj. Nidal Hasan (Fort Hood), Jared Loughner (Arizona shopping mall), James Holmes (Colorado movie theater), and a dozen other mass shootings in the past few decades.

But in every instance, Democrats' response was: Let's ban high-capacity magazines! Let's limit private gun sales! Let's publish the names of everyone who owns a registered gun!

Mass shootings don't correlate with any of these things. They correlate with not locking up crazy people. We're not worried about school kids being systematically gunned down by angry husbands, gang members or antique gun collectors. We're worried about a psychotic showing up in a public place and shooting everyone in sight.

Ann Coulter - Official Home Page

Frankly, you are probably the last person who should hope they start locking up crazy people.

most of your posts would probably get you committed.

 

[KGB]

In the case of the Conn. Shooter, it appears his mother paid a huge price for enabling his aggression. We fail on every count of identifying these people and plans to have law enforcement invovled. Coulter may be right.. But the concept of declaring folks mentally incompetent or dangerous is a basket of snakes.. Perhaps we ought to just deny gun sales to anyone under psych care for a period of time. And ask for family cooperation in removing existing guns. Not many seriously ill folks are gonna rank gun ownership as more important then the relief of drugs or treatment. IMO...

But BECAUSE these diagnosticians are winging it so much---- needs to be simple and quick legal apppeal....If a parole board is trusted to decide if an offender is dangerous --- theyll do just as well as the battling shrinks.

Ps in the case of minors, PARENTS who have weapons should be held responsible if their kids have been diagnosed withnsevere mental issues.

And I vehemently DISAGREE. You will not remove my Constitutional rights by creating an unelected board of politically motivated people to determine my competence. The law already has a system for that.

You want someone declared incompetent? Follow the law.Report them have them investigated and if needed sent before a competent Judge to determine their competence.

I carefully stated that full and continuous legal appeal sould be ALWAYS available when youre dependent on an inexact science to determine your danger level. I fully suport 2nd amend issues. HOWEVER -- if youve been diagnosed with a potential to cause harm OR you are being "treated" with drugs that can impair judgement or mental capacity --- this SHOULD be elevated to a joint medical/LEGAL issue. You have no control over when you are "under the influence" of psych drugs as you do with drugs of CHOICE, such as alcohol or even weed. If you are doing it right --- You will be perpetually under the influence.. This applies to the 10s of millions of drugged out kiddies being pacified with drugs in the same genre as cocaine.

The military would never put weapons in the hands of folks being dosed with deep psych meds or who have been observed to be a potential danger. PERHAPS we can figure out a Constitutionally sensitive way to do the same due diligience in general society.

Psychiatry and neuroscience needs to get better to even attempt to connect mental health issues with legal implications. This shouldnt be a political issue.. Crazy dangerous people on drugs lprobably shouldnt vote or fly Cessnas or drive trains either.

Could we please stop with the military-civilian comparisons? The two are mutually incompatible. The military is a specialized class who is vigorously trained not only on the weapon system of choice but the rules & laws of combat.

 

[Toro]

The more gay Republicans, the better.

 

[koshergrl]

I think they've already met the quota.

 

[koshergrl]

"Mental illness was blindingly clear in the cases of Seung-Hui Cho (Virginia Tech), Maj. Nidal Hasan (Fort Hood), Jared Loughner (Arizona shopping mall), James Holmes (Colorado movie theater), and a dozen other mass shootings in the past few decades.

But in every instance, Democrats' response was: Let's ban high-capacity magazines! Let's limit private gun sales! Let's publish the names of everyone who owns a registered gun!

Mass shootings don't correlate with any of these things. They correlate with not locking up crazy people. We're not worried about school kids being systematically gunned down by angry husbands, gang members or antique gun collectors. We're worried about a psychotic showing up in a public place and shooting everyone in sight.

Ann Coulter - Official Home Page

Frankly, you are probably the last person who should hope they start locking up crazy people.

most of your posts would probably get you committed.

I'm pretty famliar with what will get people locked up, having worked in a field where my recommendations were read to the court to determine whether or not people needed to be/remain committed.

It would be a walk in the park for me to get you manacled, lol.

 

[koshergrl]

I'd go heavy on the times you've referred to children as "medical waste". That's guaranteed to get the attention of people whose #1 priority is to protect the public.

 

[flacaltenn]

And I vehemently DISAGREE. You will not remove my Constitutional rights by creating an unelected board of politically motivated people to determine my competence. The law already has a system for that.

You want someone declared incompetent? Follow the law.Report them have them investigated and if needed sent before a competent Judge to determine their competence.

I carefully stated that full and continuous legal appeal sould be ALWAYS available when youre dependent on an inexact science to determine your danger level. I fully suport 2nd amend issues. HOWEVER -- if youve been diagnosed with a potential to cause harm OR you are being "treated" with drugs that can impair judgement or mental capacity --- this SHOULD be elevated to a joint medical/LEGAL issue. You have no control over when you are "under the influence" of psych drugs as you do with drugs of CHOICE, such as alcohol or even weed. If you are doing it right --- You will be perpetually under the influence.. This applies to the 10s of millions of drugged out kiddies being pacified with drugs in the same genre as cocaine.

The military would never put weapons in the hands of folks being dosed with deep psych meds or who have been observed to be a potential danger. PERHAPS we can figure out a Constitutionally sensitive way to do the same due diligience in general society.

Psychiatry and neuroscience needs to get better to even attempt to connect mental health issues with legal implications. This shouldnt be a political issue.. Crazy dangerous people on drugs lprobably shouldnt vote or fly Cessnas or drive trains either.

Could we please stop with the military-civilian comparisons? The two are mutually incompatible. The military is a specialized class who is vigorously trained not only on the weapon system of choice but the rules & laws of combat.

You're right. The military has special dispensation to hack into the killing instinct and enhance it.. But EVEN THEY don't want psychiatric patients on drugs in active training or service.

But the point was -- that DISCLOSURE IS REQUIRED for many instances where a person is undergoing psych care. And that adding some type of special disclosure for access to guns should be considered and perhaps have the civil libertarian issues ironed out..

https://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificates/medical_certification/specialissuance/antidepressants/index.cfm?print=go

How long will a pilot be grounded?

For pilots who are beginning treatment with antidepressants, they will be unable to fly for one year. For those pilots who either take advantage of the six-month reporting period or have stopped flying and have a medical history of successful treatment, those pilots should be able to fly within a few months.

How many extra exams will a pilot have to go through if he chooses to disclose that he takes antidepressants?

The pilot will be on a special issuance (waiver) as long as he or she is on medication. The pilot will need to be seen at least annually by a HIMS AME, more if the AME determines that additional visits are warranted. The pilot will need to see a psychiatrist every six months.

What does the FAA do if a pilot discloses that he or she is consulting a therapist (e.g., for anxiety) but there is no clinical diagnosis of depression?

A pilot will not be allowed to fly while undergoing treatment. Once the treatment is complete, the pilot may return to flying.

Dozens of examples of separating psych patients from access to dangerous equipment.

I KNOW !! It's a snake pit.. But it needs to be discussed. And we need better DETECTION and SCIENCE from the psych community..

 

[JoeB131]

I'd go heavy on the times you've referred to children as "medical waste". That's guaranteed to get the attention of people whose #1 priority is to protect the public.

Yeah, I'm sure that using offensive (to bible thumping morons) language is enough to do it...

Right.

Psst. Psst. Fetuses in abortion clinics are not put into containers marked "Children". They are put in ones marked "Medical Waste"

 

[BDBoop]

I'd go heavy on the times you've referred to children as "medical waste". That's guaranteed to get the attention of people whose #1 priority is to protect the public.

Yeah, I'm sure that using offensive (to bible thumping morons) language is enough to do it...

Right.

Psst. Psst. Fetuses in abortion clinics are not put into containers marked "Children". They are put in ones marked "Medical Waste"

/crawls under desk, assumes fetal position

"It's gonna get nasty out there!!"

 

[JoeB131]

I'd go heavy on the times you've referred to children as "medical waste". That's guaranteed to get the attention of people whose #1 priority is to protect the public.

Yeah, I'm sure that using offensive (to bible thumping morons) language is enough to do it...

Right.

Psst. Psst. Fetuses in abortion clinics are not put into containers marked "Children". They are put in ones marked "Medical Waste"

/crawls under desk, assumes fetal position

"It's gonna get nasty out there!!"

Oh, you should have seen our discussions about the Gosnell case, if you wanted to ever see someone get unglued, it was Kosher when someone suggested that maybe we should just be prosecuting Gosnell for stuff we can PROVE he did.

 

[koshergrl]

I'd go heavy on the times you've referred to children as "medical waste". That's guaranteed to get the attention of people whose #1 priority is to protect the public.

Yeah, I'm sure that using offensive (to bible thumping morons) language is enough to do it...

Right.

Psst. Psst. Fetuses in abortion clinics are not put into containers marked "Children". They are put in ones marked "Medical Waste"

/crawls under desk, assumes fetal position

"It's gonna get nasty out there!!"

Fetal = medical waste to joey. Look out, our #1 ghoul may be spying on you.

 

[koshergrl]

Yeah, I'm sure that using offensive (to bible thumping morons) language is enough to do it...

Right.

Psst. Psst. Fetuses in abortion clinics are not put into containers marked "Children". They are put in ones marked "Medical Waste"

/crawls under desk, assumes fetal position

"It's gonna get nasty out there!!"

Oh, you should have seen our discussions about the Gosnell case, if you wanted to ever see someone get unglued, it was Kosher when someone suggested that maybe we should just be prosecuting Gosnell for stuff we can PROVE he did.

Yes, it's cool to watch you shuck, jive and joke about the murder of babies...saying things like "those women are lying" interspersed with "they're owed a dead fetus".

 

[theHawk]

"Mental illness was blindingly clear in the cases of Seung-Hui Cho (Virginia Tech), Maj. Nidal Hasan (Fort Hood), Jared Loughner (Arizona shopping mall), James Holmes (Colorado movie theater), and a dozen other mass shootings in the past few decades.

But in every instance, Democrats' response was: Let's ban high-capacity magazines! Let's limit private gun sales! Let's publish the names of everyone who owns a registered gun!

Mass shootings don't correlate with any of these things. They correlate with not locking up crazy people. We're not worried about school kids being systematically gunned down by angry husbands, gang members or antique gun collectors. We're worried about a psychotic showing up in a public place and shooting everyone in sight.

Ann Coulter - Official Home Page

This is what I have been saying all along. We need to lock up criminals and those that are mentally ill and have a tendency towards violence.

But instead of addressing the real problem, libs continue to support the release of nutcases and hardened criminals alike, then when they murder people, blame it on the guns. It's all about the progressive agenda, never what is right for the country.

 

[koshergrl]

Liberals are the ones who demanded that loons be turned out and the state hospitals be shut down in the first place.

If they were targeting the private schools where these elitist crapheads send their kids to school, I'll bet they'd feel a LOT different...but public school kids, meh, they're expendable.

 

[theHawk]

I'd go heavy on the times you've referred to children as "medical waste". That's guaranteed to get the attention of people whose #1 priority is to protect the public.

Yeah, I'm sure that using offensive (to bible thumping morons) language is enough to do it...

Right.

Psst. Psst. Fetuses in abortion clinics are not put into containers marked "Children". They are put in ones marked "Medical Waste"

If someone put you in a container labeled "medical waste", would that make it true?

I guess in your case it would.

 

[JoeB131]

/crawls under desk, assumes fetal position

"It's gonna get nasty out there!!"

Oh, you should have seen our discussions about the Gosnell case, if you wanted to ever see someone get unglued, it was Kosher when someone suggested that maybe we should just be prosecuting Gosnell for stuff we can PROVE he did.

Yes, it's cool to watch you shuck, jive and joke about the murder of babies...saying things like "those women are lying" interspersed with "they're owed a dead fetus".

Yes, it was hilarious watching you nuts get unglued when you turned what should have been an open and shut case of medical negligence into a circus.

Hey, so why weren't those women who had the abortions charged with "murder"?

 

[JoeB131]

I'd go heavy on the times you've referred to children as "medical waste". That's guaranteed to get the attention of people whose #1 priority is to protect the public.

Yeah, I'm sure that using offensive (to bible thumping morons) language is enough to do it...

Right.

Psst. Psst. Fetuses in abortion clinics are not put into containers marked "Children". They are put in ones marked "Medical Waste"

If someone put you in a container labeled "medical waste", would that make it true?

I guess in your case it would.

No, that someone would be put into traction...

Fetuses aren't babies. They aren't people. And watching you wingnuts get all worked up about spooge when we've got millions of hungry children in this country is just a farce.

 

[JoeB131]

Liberals are the ones who demanded that loons be turned out and the state hospitals be shut down in the first place.

If they were targeting the private schools where these elitist crapheads send their kids to school, I'll bet they'd feel a LOT different...but public school kids, meh, they're expendable.

Actually, Sandy Hook was in a pretty ritzy neighborhood.

But here's the thing... the reason why those hospitals were shut down was because they weren't treating anyone, they were just warehouses for the disabled and the mentally ill.

When the courts shut them down because they were unconstitutional, they reasonably thought that we'd provide alternative outpatient programs for them.

But that would mean the rich couldn't buy Dressage Horsies, and we gots to have our priorities.

 

[Howey]

Ann Coulter hasn't nailed anything since that tennis player in 2002.