No, we expect people that have babies to pay for and take care those children on their own. Why is that concept soooo foreign to you libs?
By your idiotic logic, no one should have babies because "they cost money".
Hawk – Not sure if you are aware, but when someone has a baby there are many, many medical procedures that accompany that process that includes (but not limited to) ultrasounds, checkups, coverage for gestational diabetes, and of course the final hospital visit/stay where the woman gives birth. After giving birth, now there are two people who each require additional checkups, ect, ect, ect.
People - whether rich or poor -
generally don’t pay out of pocket in full for the costs of the things I mention above.
Who pays? Uh…. wait for it…….. wait……
THE INSURANCE COMPANY!
You, like an idiot, are are assuming that I’m making the argument that “well the person will have to go on welfare, and…”.
That’s not the case.
The argument I’m making is that it’s much cheaper for the insurance company to cover a non-pregnant person (who doesn’t want to get pregnant) vs covering a person who
is pregnant and all the medical costs that follow. The more pregnant people you have in your pool of customers, the more money money you will have to dish out.
Pregnant people will cost the insurance company more money.
Try using your head, doof.
