Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
What evidence did they present to the FISA court? I have heard it was that dossier only.There was already voluminous evidence that the Trump campaign was in bed with the Russians and then Trump fired Comey.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What evidence did they present to the FISA court? I have heard it was that dossier only.There was already voluminous evidence that the Trump campaign was in bed with the Russians and then Trump fired Comey.
Take it easy, dude. I was asking.You "heard that"?
Yea..it was wrong...and the Nunes memo proved that
Agree but the sad reality is the voters of this nation will pick from just two choices.True, but the sad reality is one of the two of them wins.Even if that were true, Hillary was the alternative. How would that have been better?If we are "buffaloed," then why are the snowflakes always screaming about Trump?
I don't know, nor care, about 'snowflakes'. But you are deluded. You've been sold down the river and you can't admit it.
Believe it or not, you don't have to support either one of them.
But voters don't have to continue supporting them. I can, almost, understand why someone would choose to vote for the "lesser of two evils". But if they elect a candidate who they're acknowledging is evil, to prevent the victory of the greater evil candidate, why would they go on supporting that evil candidate after the election?
I hope I never concede to this logic. But if I do, if I vote for a lesser-evil candidate and they win - the first thing I'll do is organize a campaign to get them impeached.
We've got to stop settling for evil.
The deep state is about to implode. Everyone involved in this plot should be in prison:
Andrew McCabe Admits Top NatSec Officials Plotted Coup Against Trump
Former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe publicly admitted that after the firing of James Comey, national security officials strategized on invoking the 25th amendment to remove President Trump from office.
Even if they didn't do anything, it's still illegal. Of course, the whole Mueller witch hunt is the end result of their plotting.
It's not for taking out a President that deep state traitors don't like.The deep state is about to implode. Everyone involved in this plot should be in prison:
Former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe publicly admitted that after the firing of James Comey, national security officials strategized on invoking the 25th amendment to remove President Trump from office.
“There were meetings at the Justice Department at which it was discussed whether the vice president and a majority of the cabinet could be brought together to remove the president of the United States under the 25th Amendment,” Scott Pelley said he learned in his “60 Minutes” interview with McCabe.
Pelley described the top bureaucrats as “counting noses,” and speculating on where various cabinet members might stand on the question of the president’s removal.
We have the 25th Amendment for a reason.
The Deep State is a figment of your party master's imagination.
quit being such a brain-dead sheep
Hmm. Even if we can agree that our government has to have a way out when we might have a bad president, it doesn't change the fact that the New York Times revealed that the FBI investigation of Trump for alleged treason was little more than retaliation against the president for lawfully firing an incompetent and ethically challenged FBI director.
If thats not the "deep state" I don't know what is.
Mark
The deep state is about to implode. Everyone involved in this plot should be in prison:
Former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe publicly admitted that after the firing of James Comey, national security officials strategized on invoking the 25th amendment to remove President Trump from office.
“There were meetings at the Justice Department at which it was discussed whether the vice president and a majority of the cabinet could be brought together to remove the president of the United States under the 25th Amendment,” Scott Pelley said he learned in his “60 Minutes” interview with McCabe.
Pelley described the top bureaucrats as “counting noses,” and speculating on where various cabinet members might stand on the question of the president’s removal.
It's not for taking out a President that deep state traitors don't like.The deep state is about to implode. Everyone involved in this plot should be in prison:
Former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe publicly admitted that after the firing of James Comey, national security officials strategized on invoking the 25th amendment to remove President Trump from office.
“There were meetings at the Justice Department at which it was discussed whether the vice president and a majority of the cabinet could be brought together to remove the president of the United States under the 25th Amendment,” Scott Pelley said he learned in his “60 Minutes” interview with McCabe.
Pelley described the top bureaucrats as “counting noses,” and speculating on where various cabinet members might stand on the question of the president’s removal.
We have the 25th Amendment for a reason.
The Deep State is a figment of your party master's imagination.
quit being such a brain-dead sheep
Hmm. Even if we can agree that our government has to have a way out when we might have a bad president, it doesn't change the fact that the New York Times revealed that the FBI investigation of Trump for alleged treason was little more than retaliation against the president for lawfully firing an incompetent and ethically challenged FBI director.
If thats not the "deep state" I don't know what is.
Mark
You are correct, you do not know what is. The FBI did not view their director as incompetent nor ethically challenged
The deep state is about to implode. Everyone involved in this plot should be in prison:
Andrew McCabe Admits Top NatSec Officials Plotted Coup Against Trump
Former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe publicly admitted that after the firing of James Comey, national security officials strategized on invoking the 25th amendment to remove President Trump from office.
Uh, guy, there's a reason why we HAVE a 25th Amendment... it's to remove a crazy person who gets into the white house.
Even if they didn't do anything, it's still illegal. Of course, the whole Mueller witch hunt is the end result of their plotting.
It's illegal to have a discussion about whether or not the president is nuts when he acts erratically?
It's not for taking out a President that deep state traitors don't like.We have the 25th Amendment for a reason.
The Deep State is a figment of your party master's imagination.
quit being such a brain-dead sheep
Hmm. Even if we can agree that our government has to have a way out when we might have a bad president, it doesn't change the fact that the New York Times revealed that the FBI investigation of Trump for alleged treason was little more than retaliation against the president for lawfully firing an incompetent and ethically challenged FBI director.
If thats not the "deep state" I don't know what is.
Mark
You are correct, you do not know what is. The FBI did not view their director as incompetent nor ethically challenged
That does not matter. He was LEGALLY fired from his job, and the FBI retaliated against the president because of it.
Mark
Offering to wear a wire to take down the President constitutes an act of Treason.How in Hell is discussing utilizing a Constitutional mechanism to replace a POTUS a coup?
No, they just discussed it then illegally used the Hillary-bought, Russian-Authored fake document delivered by the Trump-Hating FBI-Employed Foreign Spy to commit Fraud and Perjury in a Conspiracy to con the FISA Courts to give illegally obtained warrants to spy on Trump and his team and to con Congress into opening up an investigation of a NON-Crime where there was no evidence to support their accusations in an attempt to take down the President of the United States...because they disagreed with his Foreign Policy, hated he fired Comey, and they were afraid if Hillary won and did not clear her / help take down Trump there would be hell to pay.They looked into if it were a legal firing and they did not retaliate as they did not attempt to remove him via that 25th.
No, they just discussed it then illegally used the Hillary-bought, Russian-Authored fake document delivered by the Trump-Hating FBI-Employed Foreign Spy to commit Fraud and Perjury in a Conspiracy to con the FISA Courts to give illegally obtained warrants to spy on Trump and his team and to con Congress into opening up an investigation of a NON-Crime where there was no evidence to support their accusations in an attempt to take down the President of the United States...because they disagreed with his Foreign Policy, hated he fired Comey, and they were afraid if Hillary won and did not clear her / help take down Trump there would be hell to pay.They looked into if it were a legal firing and they did not retaliate as they did not attempt to remove him via that 25th.
All substantiated....all documented...all recorded...all supported by testimony, written statements, texts, e-mails, and documents.
Time to stop playing the Liberal denial / 'Stupid' game and acknowledge what has been proven by mounds of existing evidence.
Did they do anything??This so-called "plot". Did anyone actually do anything, or was it just a lot of "What if the President is really . . ."?
Agree but the sad reality is the voters of this nation will pick from just two choices.True, but the sad reality is one of the two of them wins.Even if that were true, Hillary was the alternative. How would that have been better?I don't know, nor care, about 'snowflakes'. But you are deluded. You've been sold down the river and you can't admit it.
Believe it or not, you don't have to support either one of them.
But voters don't have to continue supporting them. I can, almost, understand why someone would choose to vote for the "lesser of two evils". But if they elect a candidate who they're acknowledging is evil, to prevent the victory of the greater evil candidate, why would they go on supporting that evil candidate after the election?
I hope I never concede to this logic. But if I do, if I vote for a lesser-evil candidate and they win - the first thing I'll do is organize a campaign to get them impeached.
We've got to stop settling for evil.
No I get it. It would be great if Americans stopped voting for the two major “criminal “ parties, but you are terribly naive if you think that is going to happen anytime soon.Agree but the sad reality is the voters of this nation will pick from just two choices.True, but the sad reality is one of the two of them wins.Even if that were true, Hillary was the alternative. How would that have been better?
Believe it or not, you don't have to support either one of them.
But voters don't have to continue supporting them. I can, almost, understand why someone would choose to vote for the "lesser of two evils". But if they elect a candidate who they're acknowledging is evil, to prevent the victory of the greater evil candidate, why would they go on supporting that evil candidate after the election?
I hope I never concede to this logic. But if I do, if I vote for a lesser-evil candidate and they win - the first thing I'll do is organize a campaign to get them impeached.
We've got to stop settling for evil.
You seem to have missed the point of my post.
The deep state is about to implode. Everyone involved in this plot should be in prison:
Former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe publicly admitted that after the firing of James Comey, national security officials strategized on invoking the 25th amendment to remove President Trump from office.
“There were meetings at the Justice Department at which it was discussed whether the vice president and a majority of the cabinet could be brought together to remove the president of the United States under the 25th Amendment,” Scott Pelley said he learned in his “60 Minutes” interview with McCabe.
Pelley described the top bureaucrats as “counting noses,” and speculating on where various cabinet members might stand on the question of the president’s removal.