And so it begins.

[daveman]

Following the lead of multiple grand juries who voted to indict trump based on overwhelming evidence of his guilt is not weaponizing the government. It's the government enforcing the rule of law.

You probably believe that, too. Sucker!!

 

[Lesh]

It is. Just because you don't want to face the fact of the Biden Admin directly enabling child trafficking doesn't change the reality.

That’s a lie

 

[otto105]

That "TV commentator" has 20 years of military experience and two Bronze Stars.

How many Bronze Stars do you have?

He was a soldier in the military and had no experience running a department with 3.3 million employees.

Plus, he has sexual assault issues so….

 

[Mac1958]

Trump transition figure warns DOJ lawyers: Get on board or get out

Trump's very own hand-picked Deep State, existing to serve him, not the Constitution. And the cult loves it.

 

[DonGlock26]

Trump's very own hand-picked Deep State, existing to serve him, not the Constitution. And the cult loves it.

Trust the democracy.

 

[Lesh]

He was a soldier in the military and had no experience running a department with 3.3 million employees.

Plus, he has sexual assault issues so….

That last seems to be a feature

 

[otto105]

That last seems to be a feature

It got him the job because women need to be barefoot, pregnant and compliant

 

[BlackSand]

Do you support what trump said he's going to do to Jack Smith, and likely everyone on his staff?

.

I have no problem with when President Trump said he would "fire Jack Smith within two seconds" of taking Office.
The President as the senior official of the Executive Branch ... Which the Department of Justice falls under.
Is delegated the Power to fire whomever he wants at the Department of Justice ... By the Constitution of the United Sates.


Did you fail Civics ... Or just want to ignore the Constitution ...
Heads-Up ... Neither answer, nor the combination of both ... Would surprise me in your case.

.​

 

[Lesh]

.

I have no problem with when President Trump said he would "fire Jack Smith within two seconds" of taking Office.
The President as the senior official of the Executive Branch ... Which the Department of Justice falls under.
Is delegated the Power to fire whomever he wants at the Department of Justice ... By the Constitution of the United Sates.


Did you fail Civics ... Or just want to ignore the Constitution ...
Heads-Up ... Neither answer, nor the combination of both ... Would surprise me in your case.

.​

Nothing says “I’m innocent” like firing the guy investigating you

Trump has a history of that

 

[otto105]

.

I have no problem with when President Trump said he would "fire Jack Smith within two seconds" of taking Office.
The President as the senior official of the Executive Branch ... Which the Department of Justice falls under.
Is delegated the Power to fire whomever he wants at the Department of Justice ... By the Constitution of the United Sates.


Did you fail Civics ... Or just want to ignore the Constitution ...
Heads-Up ... Neither answer, nor the combination of both ... Would surprise me in your case.

.​

So, you’re a jesus freak…

 

[BlackSand]

Nothing says “I’m innocent” like firing the guy investigating you

Trump has a history of that

.

Our Constitution grants the President the Power to do what he wants at the Department of Justice ...

Whether or not you like it ... Or whatever you want to pretend it means ...
Has absolutely no bearing over what President Trump can do ...
Or the fact that anyone else needs to care what you think.

Furthermore ... I really don't care that leaves you with little more than bitterness and the need to cry in your beer.

.​

 

[JusticeHammer]

Do you support what trump said he's going to do to Jack Smith, and likely everyone on his staff?

Yes

 

[JusticeHammer]

So, you’re a jesus freak…

You're an idiot

 

[BlackSand]

So, you’re a jesus freak…

.

Why would you say that ...
Feel to find anything I have ever posted that supports Jesus.

Let me rephrase that ...
You're fucking retard that hardly ever knows what you are talking about ...

.​

 

[Lesh]

.

Our Constitution grants the President the Power to do what he wants at the Department of Justice ...

Whether or not you like it ... Or whatever you want to pretend it means ...
Has absolutely no bearing over what President Trump can do ...
Or the fact that anyone else needs to care what you think.

Furthermore ... I really don't care that leaves you with little more than bitterness and the need to cry in your beer.

.​

I seem to remember a guy named Nixon

Remember him? Remember the Saturday Night Massacre?

That was a different world huh?

 

[BlackSand]

I seem to remember a guy named Nixon

Remember him? Remember the Saturday Night Massacre?

That was a different world huh?

.

I remember President Nixon ... Shit, I know about Presidents since the first one we ever had.
I either know, or know how to find out, about every President Impeached, Arrested, Indicted or simply Accused of being a scoundrel.

To answer your question ...
No, it's not a different world you ignorant twat ...

If all you have to say is based in nothing more than what is akin to a schoolyard ... "I'm not, but you are" ...
Save yourself the trouble because it doesn't make you smart ...
It makes you a retarded political hack that isn't even good at that ...

The post you responded to was discussing Constitutional powers granted to the President and the Executive Branch ...
It had absolutely nothing to do with President Nixon, President Grant, President Lincoln, President Clinton ...
Or anything else ... Keep up or shut up nit-wit.


.​

 

[daveman]

He was a soldier in the military and had no experience running a department with 3.3 million employees.

Plus, he has sexual assault issues so….

How many Bronze Stars did you say you had?

Here's the thing. You don't get a say in how this country is managed. We tried it your way for four years, and we decided that didn't work. You didn't learn anything from your loss, but that's beside the point. We're trying a different way now.

And all you can do about it is bitch impotently on the internet. Net effect: Zero.

 

[jc456]

Trump transition figure warns DOJ lawyers: Get on board or get out

A conservative lawyer working on Donald Trump’s transition, Mark Paoletta, offered a stark warning to career Justice Department lawyers Monday that those who refuse to advance Trump’s agenda should resign or face the possibility of being fired.

“Once the decision is made to move forward, career employees are required to implement the President’s plan,” Paoletta wrote in a post on X responding to a POLITICO story detailing widespread fear among DOJ lawyers about being asked to advance or defend policies they consider unethical or illegal.

“If these career DOJ employees won’t implement President Trump’s program in good faith, they should leave,” Paoletta said. “Those employees who engage in so-called ‘resistance’ against the duly-elected President’s lawful agenda would be subverting American democracy (or upholding it). … [t]hose that take such actions would be subject to disciplinary measures, including termination.”

Paoletta recited a laundry list of Trump goals, including mass deportations, ending birthright citizenship, issuing pardons and commutations to Jan. 6 defendants, reversing “lawfare and persecution of political opponents,” and “holding accountable those who weaponized their government authority to abuse Americans.”
https://www.politico.com/live-updat...-paoletta-justice-department-lawyers-00188772

Let's begin with this, trump's goal coming in to the start of his admin is to purge the government of those viewed to be disloyal. This has been well advertised.

Now consider the ACLU plans to challenge the legality of trump using the law he plans to use to facilitate mass deportations.

https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/i-heard-an-interesting-interview-with-the-head-of-the-aclu-yesterday.1134492/#post-35690588

If members of the DoJ agree with the ACLU's position, will they be fired before the matter can be adjudicated? Because it seems to me the admin is already looking for a pretense to fire people opposed to their policies...........policies which may be illegal.

In his first admin a number of high ranking DoJ officials said they world resign if Jeff Clark was made acting AG. No such officials will be part of the new admin if trump has his way.

To be clear, if DoJ employees try to block legal and ethical policy goals firing them is appropriate.

Voters said loudly goodbye to your DOJ

 

[daveman]

So, you’re a jesus freak…

You're at the wrong rally. You need to be at the little one down the street. The one with the losers.

 

[otto105]

How many Bronze Stars did you say you had?

Here's the thing. You don't get a say in how this country is managed. We tried it your way for four years, and we decided that didn't work. You didn't learn anything from your loss, but that's beside the point. We're trying a different way now.

And all you can do about it is bitch impotently on the internet. Net effect: Zero.

Hilarious

The Shirler is already on the fann

Voters said loudly goodbye to your DOJ

so, become a toady