And About The Stolen Election....

Until they have to reveal their source code.

and the public are the ones who will elect Trump for the third time.

CNN is going to 'reveal their source code'? I think you may be confused.

Remember, Trump already had a chance to call witnesses, to hold them to account under oath, to present his argument in its totality, in court.

Trump voluntarily dismissed his own case a day before the trial was to begin.


"On the eve of getting the day in court they supposedly were begging for, President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger rather than submit their evidence to a court and to cross-examination."


But this time its different, huh?

Good luck with that.
 
CNN is going to 'reveal their source code'? I think you may be confused.

Remember, Trump already had a chance to call witnesses, to hold them to account under oath, to present his argument in its totality, in court.

Trump voluntarily dismissed his own case a day before the trial was to begin.

"On the eve of getting the day in court they supposedly were begging for, President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger rather than submit their evidence to a court and to cross-examination."


But this time its different, huh?

Good luck with that.
I mean Dominion has to release their source code to prove the election was on the level. Without doing that I do not see how they can win. They have to prove the accusations are false.
 
I mean Dominion has to release their source code to prove the election was on the level. Without doing that I do not see how they can win. They have to prove the accusations are false.

'Disprove any conspiracy I make up!' isn't a legal requirement. Dominion has had to produce no source code in any discovery requirements in any of its lawsuits against Gulliani, Powell or Lindel. Why would Dominion have to do this for a case in which they're not even a party?

This is why you guys tend to do so poorly in court: the court isn't bound to your made up pseudo-legal requirements.
 
Show me the court cases, state and federal, that found that the 2020 election violated McPherson or the Supremacy Clause.

You can't, as no court found this to be so. You're citing yourself......insisting that YOU and YOU alone get to define what a ruling or passage from the constitution is supposed to mean.

You don't. You're nobody. Try again.
What does the word 'exclusive' mean?

Which predominates, the Constitution or an state decree?

Answer the questions.
 
What does the word 'exclusive' mean?

Which predominates, the Constitution or an state decree?

Answer the questions.

Again, you insist that McPherson and the Supremacy Clause were violated in the 2020 election. The state and federal courts have not found this to be true. These issues were already adjudicated. Absentee ballots, drop boxes, and the courts contradicted you.

You lost.
Your personal interpretations are NOT the law of the land.

Try again.
 
I mean Dominion has to release their source code to prove the election was on the level. Without doing that I do not see how they can win. They have to prove the accusations are false.
Dominion voting machines do not report the absolute number or sorting of the ballots as cast.......instead, they allow the ‘adjusting’ of the number and selection of the votes.







In the contracts that Dominion signs with municipalities, we find the following:



AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA AND DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC. This Agreement is entered into between the County of Santa Clara (“County”) and Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. (“Contractor” or “Dominion”) (collectively, the “Parties”).



Section 2.26 "Allows staff to adjust tally based on review of scanned ballot images."

1659037538034.png



Klobachar letter

In 2019, a letter was sent from Amy Klobuchar and several other pols…all Democrats, who asked why Dominion continued to sell machines with these known vulnerabilities before an upcoming election.

“2019 Document Reveals Warren and Klobuchar Filed Official Complaint Against “Dominion Voting” For “Vote Switching”
A newly unearthed document reveals that back in 2019, Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar, and Ron Wyden all filed formal complaints against the voting systems company, claiming they were a threat to “voting integrity” and citing situations of “vote switching” as a reason.

Here’s what the complaint said in part: “These problems threaten the integrity of our elections.” Senators Elizabeth Warren (D), Amy Klobuchar (D) & Ron Wyden (D) issue a formal complaint in 2019 to Dominion Voting Systems. Among the complaints? Allegations of ‘vote-switching.’
1659037598029.png



2019 Document Reveals Warren and Klobuchar Filed Official Complaint Against "Dominion Voting" For "Vote Switching" - WayneDupree.com
 
Again, you insist that McPherson and the Supremacy Clause were violated in the 2020 election. The state and federal courts have not found this to be true.

Your personal interpretations are NOT the law of the land.

Try again.
What does the word 'exclusive' mean?

Which predominates, the Constitution or an state decree?

Answer the questions.
 
Dominion voting machines do not report the absolute number or sorting of the ballots as cast.......instead, they allow the ‘adjusting’ of the number and selection of the votes.







In the contracts that Dominion signs with municipalities, we find the following:



AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA AND DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC. This Agreement is entered into between the County of Santa Clara (“County”) and Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. (“Contractor” or “Dominion”) (collectively, the “Parties”).



Section 2.26 "Allows staff to adjust tally based on review of scanned ballot images."

View attachment 675674


Klobachar letter

In 2019, a letter was sent from Amy Klobuchar and several other pols…all Democrats, who asked why Dominion continued to sell machines with these known vulnerabilities before an upcoming election.

“2019 Document Reveals Warren and Klobuchar Filed Official Complaint Against “Dominion Voting” For “Vote Switching”
A newly unearthed document reveals that back in 2019, Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar, and Ron Wyden all filed formal complaints against the voting systems company, claiming they were a threat to “voting integrity” and citing situations of “vote switching” as a reason.

Here’s what the complaint said in part: “These problems threaten the integrity of our elections.” Senators Elizabeth Warren (D), Amy Klobuchar (D) & Ron Wyden (D) issue a formal complaint in 2019 to Dominion Voting Systems. Among the complaints? Allegations of ‘vote-switching.’
View attachment 675675


2019 Document Reveals Warren and Klobuchar Filed Official Complaint Against "Dominion Voting" For "Vote Switching" - WayneDupree.com

The FBI investigated claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election and found nothing that would have changed the outcome of the election.

Remember, this wasn't close. Biden won by a landslide.
 
What does the word 'exclusive' mean?

Which predominates, the Constitution or an state decree?

Answer the questions.
Show us the state and federal court cases that found that the 2020 election violated either McPherson or the Supremacy Clause.

You can't. They don't exist.

You are citing yourself. And you citing yourself is not the law of the land.

You're stuck. You don't have 'proof'. You have your personal opinion that you insist overrides every court ruling. It doesn't.
 
Interpretations????


You insist on being lying scum????


Fine.

There is no 'interpretation' of the word "exclusive."

Let's see what you've learned: who predominates, the Constitution or a state court?

Answer the question!!!!!


LOL

"Exclusive" is YOUR word, not the Constitution's.
 
View attachment 675663

“Enough Fraudulent Votes Identified to Change 2020 Election Outcome: Dinesh D’Souza

Analysis of cell phone records performed by an election intelligence group shows that thousands of fraudulent ballots were deposited in mail-in drop boxes during the 2020 election, an amount sufficient to change the outcome of the election, said Dinesh D’Souza, director and writer of the documentary “2000 Mules.” Many people, including D’Souza, were baffled by numerous anomalies occurring in the 2020 election especially by the sudden stopping of the vote count on the election night followed by a remarkable turnaround the next morning, the filmmaker said.” Enough Fraudulent Votes Identified to Change 2020 Election Outcome: Dinesh D’Souza



“BREAKING BIG: Former Senator David Perdue Sues Fulton County for “Absentee Ballots…Scanned Multiple Times” and “16,000 Ballots” Not Counted in 2020 Election” BREAKING BIG: Former Senator David Perdue Sues Fulton County for "Absentee Ballots...Scanned Multiple Times" and "16,000 Ballots" Not Counted in 2020 Election







“Roughly 43,000 absentee ballot counted in DeKalb County in 2020 violated chain of custody rule


More than 70% of the 61,731 absentee ballots put in drop boxes were counted, certified despite violating chain of custody requirements.” Roughly 43,000 absentee ballot counted in DeKalb County in 2020 violated chain of custody rule







“Report: Wisconsin Lost Track of 82,000 Ballots in State Biden Won by 20,000


However, according to the legal foundation’s report, 82,766 mail-in ballots in the state were either undeliverable or suffered an unknown fate.








"Georgia ballots rejected by machines were later altered by election workers to count


... marks for candidates like Trump were sometimes removed so ballots could count for Biden.

A Dominion Voting machine had rejected the ballot on election night because the voter had filled in boxes for both Trump and his Democratic opponent Joe Biden, an error known as an "overvote." The machine determined neither candidate should get a tally, and the ballot was referred for human review.



The image of the ballot, obtained by Just the News, shows the voter messily scribbled a large blob in the box to select Trump as president while also putting a thinner check mark next to Biden's name. "






“Elections Expert Seth Keshel Releases National Fraud Numbers: Finds 8.1 Million Excess Votes in US Election, Affirms Trump Won PA, MI, WI, NV, AZ, GA and MN
…examined the final vote counts in all 50 states compared to the estimated numbers based on changing state dynamics and trends to come up with his estimated voter fraud in each state.










“… an independent election audit team poured through ballot images in Fulton County, Georgia and found numerous examples of fraudulent ballots double-counted in the election. The forensic auditing team found double-counted ballots from the 2020 election and showed them in a video release. “At least 36 batches of mail-in ballots from the November election were double-counted in Fulton County, that is a total of at least 4,000 votes,” he said.”










https://greatawakening.win/p/12iNZT1aAG/x/c/4E0vozJeJN8





“Data scientists testified nearly 18,000 electronic votes in Georgia switched from Trump to Biden
A team of data scientists testifying before a state Senate panel in Georgia earlier this week said thousands of votes were switched from President Donald Trump to his Democratic challenger Joe Biden during balloting last month.” Data scientists testified nearly 18,000 electronic votes in Georgia switched from Trump to Biden





Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!


Extremely suspicious.



Published

7 hours ago

on

Nov 22, 2020

By

Richard Moorhead



Top of Form​
A Fulton County, Georgia woman is describing handling a “pristine” batch of ballots that were marked “98%” of the time for Joe Biden in election recount duties, describing the suspicious phenomenon in a sworn affidavit.

Susan Voyles identifies herself as a participant in Georgia’s post-election recount in the affidavit, filed in litigation against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger by Trump campaign attorney Lin Wood.

Voyles describes seeing ballots that differed considerably from the other ballots she was entrusted to count in the remix.

Voyles describes the batch of ballots as unusual in their texture and level of handling, and that she estimates 98% of them were cast for Joe Biden. Voyles even speculates that these ballots could’ve been processed through a ballot-marking device!



Voyles earlier described election recount supervisors as tasking them to process ballots in a “selective” fashion. Boxes of absentee ballots were signed by no one, without markings one might expect the Georgia Secretary of State to outfit absentee ballots with.

Another witness describes viewing election workers count 500 straight ballots for Joe Biden, all of which were marked with perfect black bubbles.”






=========================================================
Did everyone see this whistle blower who saw the machinations in Democrat Detroit?



Ballots altered, Republican poll watchers kept out....











This lady was an IT employee of Dominion voting machines.

When she saw what was going on, she notified her boss, who didn't want to hear it.





Sworn affidavits are considered as evidence.



"Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged
Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center

By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle
on 5th November 2020 @ 7.00pm



© press
The widows were covered in opaque cardboard by election officials
Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of the ballot counting room, blocking poll watchers from witnessing the vote count."


Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged

Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center - Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of... | NEON NETTLE

neonnettle.com
















https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avh-kOYfaOs



"New evidence suggests potentially enough fraudulent votes to prove Trump won in Georgia

According to a new report there were potentially enough fraudulent votes cast in Georgia, from people who voted in counties they had already moved out of, to take away the 12,670 vote lead that Biden won by last November:



FEDERALIST – New evidence indicates that more than 10,300 illegal votes were cast in Georgia in the November 2020 general election — a number that will continue to rise over the next several months, potentially exceeding the 12,670 votes that separated Joe Biden and Donald Trump.




Under Georgia law, residents must vote in the county in which they reside, unless they changed their residence within 30 days of the election. As Jake Evans, a well-known Atlanta election lawyer, told me, outside of the 30-day grace period, if people vote in a county in which they no longer reside, “Their vote in that county would be illegal.”




Soon after the November general election, Mark Davis, the president of Data Productions Inc. and an expert in voter data analytics and residency issues, obtained data from the National Change of Address (NCOA) database that identified Georgia residents who had confirmed moves with the U.S. Postal Service. After excluding moves with effective dates within 30 days of the general election, and by using data available from the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office, Davis identified nearly 35,000 Georgia voters who indicated they had moved from one Georgia county to another, but then voted in the 2020 general election in the county from which they had moved.




Some of those moves could have been temporary, involving students or members of the military, Davis stressed, adding that under Georgia law temporary relocations do not alter citizens’ residency status or render their votes illegal. But, given the margin separating the two presidential candidates, approximately one-third of the votes at issue could have altered the outcome of the election. Yet the media, the courts, and the Secretary of State’s Office ignored or downplayed the issue.
“It was disconcerting to see the media and the courts largely ignore serious issues like these, especially since the data I was seeing showed very legitimate issues,” Davis said. “In fact, I heard members of the Secretary of State’s team admit some votes were cast with residency issues, but then claimed there weren’t enough of them to cast the outcome of the election in doubt,” Davis added. “That was not at all what I was seeing, and as far as I am aware the Secretary of State’s Office has never put an actual number on the ones they did see.”

Click to expand...

New evidence suggests potentially enough fraudulent votes to prove Trump won in Georgia

According to a new report there were potentially enough fraudulent votes cast in Georgia, from people who voted in counties they had already moved out of, to take away the 12,670 vote lead that Bid…

therightscoop.com




Nutcase, D'Souza failed miserably. He claimed 54,000 people dropped off multiple ballots multiple times. Despite having access to 4 million minutes of video, he didn't show even one person, out of 54,000, on camera doing that.
 
Nutcase, D'Souza failed miserably. He claimed 54,000 people dropped off multiple ballots multiple times. Despite having access to 4 million minutes of video, he didn't show even one person, out of 54,000, on camera doing that.

My favorite part of D'Souza's silly conspiracy....was the map of Moscow being presented as downtown Atlanta.

Its like he's trolling conservatives and their gulliability.
 
My favorite part of D'Souza's silly conspiracy....was the map of Moscow being presented as downtown Atlanta.

Its like he's trolling conservatives and their gulliability.
Why don't you prove that. I'll wait.
 
When you're presenting evidence, you can demand it.

Question though.....does Atlanta have a river snaking through it? Because D'Souza's graphic of Atlanta does.
So you made it up, or saw an edited video.
 
So you made it up, or saw an edited video.

When you are providing evidence, you can demand it.

You don't do the former, so no one is obligated to provide you with the latter.

So riddle me this: is there is a river winding through Atlanta? Its such a simple question.
 
When you are providing evidence, you can demand it.

You don't do the former, so no one is obligated to provide you with the latter.

So riddle me this: is there is a river winding through Atlanta? Its such a simple question.
There are mountains of evidence the criminals you support just deny. They think you are scared and dumb. They are right.
 
There are mountains of evidence the criminals you support just deny. They think you are scared and dumb. They are right.

Mountains of evidence....unless you ask to actually see it and test it.

Remember, Trump had an trial scheduled where he could call witnesses, present all his evidence and *prove* in a court of law that the election was stolen.

But at such a trial he'd actually have to present the evidence, have it subject to cross examiation and be held to the standards of the law. So what do you think Trump did? That's right.....he tucked his tail between his legs and voluntarily dismissed his own trial a day before it was to begin.

So much for your 'stolen election'. If Trump's claims were evidence based, he wouldn't have had to flee.
 
Mountains of evidence....unless you ask to actually see it and test it.

Remember, Trump had an trial scheduled where he could call witnesses, present all his evidence and *prove* in a court of law that the election was stolen.

But at such a trial he'd actually have to present the evidence, have it subject to cross examiation and be held to the standards of the law. So what do you think Trump did? That's right.....he tucked his tail between his legs and voluntarily dismissed his own trial a day before it was to begin.

So much for your 'stolen election'. If Trump's claims were evidence based, he wouldn't have had to flee.
It has been shown to enough people. Half the country knows the election was stolen. Your lie is a failure.
 
It has been shown to enough people. Half the country knows the election was stolen. Your lie is a failure.

And 'it' is unconvincing. No court has ever found Trump's Big Lie to be credible.

Which explains his spectacular record of failure when held to the standards of the law.

And why he fled, voluntarily dismissing his own case when held to those standards.

If his claims were valid and evidence based, he wouldn't have to flee.
 

Forum List

Back
Top