And About The Stolen Election....

[PoliticalChic]

You are not the constitution. Your interpretations are not the constitution.

The question you're actually asking is....who predominates: Your personal interpretation of the constitution or an actual state court.

And the answer is, of course, a state court.

Or the federal courts. Remember, they've rejected your claims too. These issues were already adjudicated. You lost.

"The question you're actually asking is....who predominates: Your personal interpretation of the constitution or an actual state court.

And the answer is, of course, a state court."

Wrong, and another lie.
Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”

​

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

supreme.justia.com



But....this occurred: courts altered voting rules.
“In Pennsylvania, the question was whether the state’s Supreme Court could override voting rules set by the state legislature. In North Carolina, the question was whether state election officials had the power to alter such voting rules.”
NYTimes

Sooo.....no, the election was not correctly decided, and we don't actually know who won the election.





Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Supremacy Clause | Wex | US Law

 

[Skylar]

You low-life lying scum.....there is no "interpretation " in any of my posts.......nothing but 100% fact.


Three times I have provided the actual words of the Constitution.


You have been useful as a stereotypical lying low-life Democrat.

"Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life," by Sissela Bok​

“The role that one assigns to truthfulness will always remain central in considering what kind of person one wants to be—how one wishes to treat, not only other people, but oneself.

We gradually learn, from childhood on, what it is to lie and to be lied to. We know the power over others that deceit may confer; and how much easier it is to slip into a lie than to undo its effects.

Everyone makes mistakes of this kind; but it is another matter altogether to choose to knowingly deal with others through deceit. The most serious miscalculation people make when weighing lies is to evaluate th costs and benefit of a particular lie in an isolated case, and then to favor lies if the benefits seem to outweigh the costs. In so doing, they risk blinding themselves to the effect that such lying can have on their integrity and self-respect, ....

Your claims that the 2020 election is illegitimate because of conflicts with the constitution is ALL interpretation.

Your insistence that McPherson was violated in the 2020 election is your interpretation.....the courts never found this.

Your insistence that the Supremacy Clause was violated in the 2020 election is your interpretation....the courts never found this either.

And of course, its contradicted by actual courts, both at the State and Federal level. Remember, these issues were already adjudicated. Ballot boxes were already adjudicated. Absentee ballots were already adjudicated. The courts haven't found that there were constitutional conflicts in the 2020 election.

You did, citing your interpretations.

The courts haven't found that the 2020 election was stolen or illegitimate.

You did, citing your interpretations.

And you're nobody. What else have you got?

 

[Skylar]

"The question you're actually asking is....who predominates: Your personal interpretation of the constitution or an actual state court.

And the answer is, of course, a state court."

Wrong, and another lie.
Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”

​

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

supreme.justia.com



But....this occurred: courts altered voting rules.
“In Pennsylvania, the question was whether the state’s Supreme Court could override voting rules set by the state legislature. In North Carolina, the question was whether state election officials had the power to alter such voting rules.”
NYTimes

Sooo.....no, the election was not correctly decided, and we don't actually know who won the election.





Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Supremacy Clause | Wex | US Law

Neither the state nor federal courts found that the 2020 election violated McPherson V. Blacker or the Supremacy Clause.
You did, citing your personal interpretations of McPherson and the Supremacy Clause.

And your personal interpretations of the constitution and court rulings is not the law of the land.

So much for your 'proof'.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Your claims that the 2020 election is illegitimate because of conflicts with the constitution is ALL interpretation.

And of course, its contradicted by actual courts, both at the State and Federal level. Remember, these issues were already adjudicated. Ballot boxes were already adjudicated. Absentee ballots were already adjudicated. The courts haven't found that there were constitutional conflicts in the 2020 election.

You did, citing your interpretations.

The courts haven't found that the 2020 election was stolen or illegitimate.

You did, citing your interpretations.

And you're nobody. What else have you got?

There is no interpretation of the word 'exclusive'....you low-life liar.

Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”


McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

supreme.justia.com



But....this occurred: courts altered voting rules.
“In Pennsylvania, the question was whether the state’s Supreme Court could override voting rules set by the state legislature. In North Carolina, the question was whether state election officials had the power to alter such voting rules.”
NYTimes

Sooo.....no, the election was not correctly decided, and we don't actually know who won the election.





Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Supremacy Clause | Wex | US Law

 

[Lastamender]

Oh, Trump can't file any suit he wants. But as his essentially perfect record of failure in court regarding his "Big Lie" demonstrates......filing a suit by itself doesn't amount to much.

There's a reason why Trump voluntarily dismissed his OWN court case in Georgia less than 48 hours before the trial was to begin: his claims don't do well when subject to the actual standards of the law before actual judges.

If genuinely sues CNN (and it isn't laughed out of court immediately), CNN gets discovery. Trump's people have been pleading the 5th like they get a nickle for everytime they refuse to answer questions. The 5th is much harder to apply to civil cases. They'll have to answer. As will Trump. And CNN will have a field day with it.

Since Trump's core argument is his state of mind, CNN can bring in hearsay at their whim. As the establishment of state of mind is one of the largest hearsay exceptions.

Trump is not lying.

 

[Skylar]

Trump is not lying.

Trump's entire legal argument is that since he believes his Big Lie, he can't be lying.

Good luck with that.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Neither the state nor federal courts found that the 2020 election violated McPherson V. Blacker or the Supremacy Clause.
You did, citing your personal interpretations of McPherson and the Supremacy Clause.

And your personal interpretations of the constitution and court rulings is not the law of the land.

So much for your 'proof'.

It's on the docket for October, as Moore vs Harper.


No court heard the evidence up to now.


Be worried......be very worried, low-life.

 

[Skylar]

There is no interpretation of the word 'exclusive'....you low-life liar.

Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”


McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

supreme.justia.com



But....this occurred: courts altered voting rules.
“In Pennsylvania, the question was whether the state’s Supreme Court could override voting rules set by the state legislature. In North Carolina, the question was whether state election officials had the power to alter such voting rules.”
NYTimes

Sooo.....no, the election was not correctly decided, and we don't actually know who won the election.





Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Supremacy Clause | Wex | US Law

Show me the court ruling that found that the 2020 election violated the McPherson ruling. You can't....as you're citing YOURSELF.

And you're nobody.

Show me the court ruling that found that the 2020 election violated the Supremacy Clause. You can't....as you're citing YOURSELF.

And you're nobody.

Show the court ruling that found that the 2020 election was stolen or illegitimate. You can't....as you're citing YOURSELF.

And ....say it with me....You're nobody.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Trump's entire legal argument is that since he believes his Big Lie, he can't be lying.

Good luck with that.

“Enough Fraudulent Votes Identified to Change 2020 Election Outcome: Dinesh D’Souza

Analysis of cell phone records performed by an election intelligence group shows that thousands of fraudulent ballots were deposited in mail-in drop boxes during the 2020 election, an amount sufficient to change the outcome of the election, said Dinesh D’Souza, director and writer of the documentary “2000 Mules.” Many people, including D’Souza, were baffled by numerous anomalies occurring in the 2020 election especially by the sudden stopping of the vote count on the election night followed by a remarkable turnaround the next morning, the filmmaker said.” Enough Fraudulent Votes Identified to Change 2020 Election Outcome: Dinesh D’Souza



“BREAKING BIG: Former Senator David Perdue Sues Fulton County for “Absentee Ballots…Scanned Multiple Times” and “16,000 Ballots” Not Counted in 2020 Election” BREAKING BIG: Former Senator David Perdue Sues Fulton County for "Absentee Ballots...Scanned Multiple Times" and "16,000 Ballots" Not Counted in 2020 Election







“Roughly 43,000 absentee ballot counted in DeKalb County in 2020 violated chain of custody rule

More than 70% of the 61,731 absentee ballots put in drop boxes were counted, certified despite violating chain of custody requirements.” Roughly 43,000 absentee ballot counted in DeKalb County in 2020 violated chain of custody rule







“Report: Wisconsin Lost Track of 82,000 Ballots in State Biden Won by 20,000

However, according to the legal foundation’s report, 82,766 mail-in ballots in the state were either undeliverable or suffered an unknown fate.

Wisconsin Lost Track of 4 Times More Ballots than Biden Won by in 2020

According to the legal foundation’s report, 82,766 mail-in ballots in Wisconsin were either undeliverable or suffered an unknown fate.

www.dailysignal.com

"Georgia ballots rejected by machines were later altered by election workers to count

... marks for candidates like Trump were sometimes removed so ballots could count for Biden.

A Dominion Voting machine had rejected the ballot on election night because the voter had filled in boxes for both Trump and his Democratic opponent Joe Biden, an error known as an "overvote." The machine determined neither candidate should get a tally, and the ballot was referred for human review.



The image of the ballot, obtained by Just the News, shows the voter messily scribbled a large blob in the box to select Trump as president while also putting a thinner check mark next to Biden's name. "

Georgia ballots rejected by machines were later altered by election workers to count

Records obtained by Just the News provide unprecedented glimpse into human adjudication of thousands of ballots, where marks for candidates like Trump were sometimes removed so ballots could count for Biden.

justthenews.com

“Elections Expert Seth Keshel Releases National Fraud Numbers: Finds 8.1 Million Excess Votes in US Election, Affirms Trump Won PA, MI, WI, NV, AZ, GA and MN …examined the final vote counts in all 50 states compared to the estimated numbers based on changing state dynamics and trends to come up with his estimated voter fraud in each state.

Elections Expert Seth Keshel Releases National Fraud Numbers: Finds 8.1 Million Excess Votes in US Election, Affirms Trump Won PA, MI, WI, NV, AZ, GA and MN | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Retired Army intelligence captain, elections data expert, and former baseball analyst Seth Keshel released his final national fraud numbers over the weekend.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

“… an independent election audit team poured through ballot images in Fulton County, Georgia and found numerous examples of fraudulent ballots double-counted in the election. The forensic auditing team found double-counted ballots from the 2020 election and showed them in a video release. “At least 36 batches of mail-in ballots from the November election were double-counted in Fulton County, that is a total of at least 4,000 votes,” he said.”

'Flat-Out Criminal Fraud': Tucker Reveals *Bombshell* Findings in Fulton County Election Audit

"At least 36 batches of mail-in ballots from the November election were double-counted in Fulton County, that is a total of at least 4,000 votes"...

beckernews.com

https://greatawakening.win/p/12iNZT1aAG/x/c/4E0vozJeJN8





“Data scientists testified nearly 18,000 electronic votes in Georgia switched from Trump to Biden A team of data scientists testifying before a state Senate panel in Georgia earlier this week said thousands of votes were switched from President Donald Trump to his Democratic challenger Joe Biden during balloting last month.” Data scientists testified nearly 18,000 electronic votes in Georgia switched from Trump to Biden





Georgia Recount Worker Describes “Pristine” Batch of Ballots – 98% for Joe Biden!

Extremely suspicious.



Published

7 hours ago

on

Nov 22, 2020

By

Richard Moorhead

Top of Form​

A Fulton County, Georgia woman is describing handling a “pristine” batch of ballots that were marked “98%” of the time for Joe Biden in election recount duties, describing the suspicious phenomenon in a sworn affidavit.

Susan Voyles identifies herself as a participant in Georgia’s post-election recount in the affidavit, filed in litigation against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger by Trump campaign attorney Lin Wood.

Voyles describes seeing ballots that differed considerably from the other ballots she was entrusted to count in the remix.

Voyles describes the batch of ballots as unusual in their texture and level of handling, and that she estimates 98% of them were cast for Joe Biden. Voyles even speculates that these ballots could’ve been processed through a ballot-marking device!



Voyles earlier described election recount supervisors as tasking them to process ballots in a “selective” fashion. Boxes of absentee ballots were signed by no one, without markings one might expect the Georgia Secretary of State to outfit absentee ballots with.

Another witness describes viewing election workers count 500 straight ballots for Joe Biden, all of which were marked with perfect black bubbles.”

Georgia Recount Worker Describes "Pristine" Batch of Ballots - 98% for Joe Biden! - Big League Politics

Extremely suspicious.

bigleaguepolitics.com

=========================================================
Did everyone see this whistle blower who saw the machinations in Democrat Detroit?



Ballots altered, Republican poll watchers kept out....











This lady was an IT employee of Dominion voting machines.

When she saw what was going on, she notified her boss, who didn't want to hear it.





Sworn affidavits are considered as evidence.



"Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged
Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center
By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle
on 5th November 2020 @ 7.00pm



© press
The widows were covered in opaque cardboard by election officials
Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of the ballot counting room, blocking poll watchers from witnessing the vote count."

​

Detroit Officials Cover-Up Windows During Ballot Count, Voters Outraged

Poll watchers blocked from witnessing vote count at TCF Center - Chaos has erupted at the TCF Center in Detroit after election officials covered-up the windows of... | NEON NETTLE

neonnettle.com
















https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avh-kOYfaOs



"New evidence suggests potentially enough fraudulent votes to prove Trump won in Georgia

According to a new report there were potentially enough fraudulent votes cast in Georgia, from people who voted in counties they had already moved out of, to take away the 12,670 vote lead that Biden won by last November:



FEDERALIST – New evidence indicates that more than 10,300 illegal votes were cast in Georgia in the November 2020 general election — a number that will continue to rise over the next several months, potentially exceeding the 12,670 votes that separated Joe Biden and Donald Trump.




Under Georgia law, residents must vote in the county in which they reside, unless they changed their residence within 30 days of the election. As Jake Evans, a well-known Atlanta election lawyer, told me, outside of the 30-day grace period, if people vote in a county in which they no longer reside, “Their vote in that county would be illegal.”




Soon after the November general election, Mark Davis, the president of Data Productions Inc. and an expert in voter data analytics and residency issues, obtained data from the National Change of Address (NCOA) database that identified Georgia residents who had confirmed moves with the U.S. Postal Service. After excluding moves with effective dates within 30 days of the general election, and by using data available from the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office, Davis identified nearly 35,000 Georgia voters who indicated they had moved from one Georgia county to another, but then voted in the 2020 general election in the county from which they had moved.




Some of those moves could have been temporary, involving students or members of the military, Davis stressed, adding that under Georgia law temporary relocations do not alter citizens’ residency status or render their votes illegal. But, given the margin separating the two presidential candidates, approximately one-third of the votes at issue could have altered the outcome of the election. Yet the media, the courts, and the Secretary of State’s Office ignored or downplayed the issue.
“It was disconcerting to see the media and the courts largely ignore serious issues like these, especially since the data I was seeing showed very legitimate issues,” Davis said. “In fact, I heard members of the Secretary of State’s team admit some votes were cast with residency issues, but then claimed there weren’t enough of them to cast the outcome of the election in doubt,” Davis added. “That was not at all what I was seeing, and as far as I am aware the Secretary of State’s Office has never put an actual number on the ones they did see.”

Click to expand...

​

New evidence suggests potentially enough fraudulent votes to prove Trump won in Georgia

According to a new report there were potentially enough fraudulent votes cast in Georgia, from people who voted in counties they had already moved out of, to take away the 12,670 vote lead that Bid…

therightscoop.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

Show me the court ruling that found that the 2020 election violated the McPherson ruling. You can't....as you're citing YOURSELF.

And you're nobody.

Show me the court ruling that found that the 2020 election violated the Supremacy Clause. You can't....as you're citing YOURSELF.

And you're nobody.

Show the court ruling that found that the 2020 election was stolen or illegitimate. You can't....as you're citing YOURSELF.

And ....say it with me....You're nobody.

What does the word 'exclusive' mean?

Which predominates, the Constitution or an state decree?

Answer the questions.

 

[Lastamender]

Trump's entire legal argument is that since he believes his Big Lie, he can't be lying.

Good luck with that.

83% of people believe the election had 0 integrity. 55% believe the election was stolen. There is a thread on it. Your big lie has failed spectacularly.

 

[Skylar]

It's on the docket for October, as Moore vs Harper.


No court heard the evidence up to now.


Be worried......be very worried, low-life.

First, bullshit. The courts have heard evidence before. The 'evidence' was laughable and lacked credibility.

"Republican challengers filed suit to try to stop the certification of Detroit’s election results. On Friday a Wayne County Circuit Court Judge Timothy Kenny denied their motion.

Judge Kenny said the plaintiff’s witnesses did not understand the ballot tabulation process, and quote, “No formal challenges were filed. However, sinister, fraudulent motives were ascribed to the process and the City of Detroit. Plaintiffs’ interpretation of events is incorrect and not credible.”

How then could Judge Kenny ruled....if no court has heard evidence before?

Second, you're literally using a ruling that DOESN'T EXIST as your proof of the validity of your imagination. As there's been no ruling on Moore vs Harper.

When you have to cite a ruling that DOESN'T EXIST to support your argument, you demonstrate why you have to abandon so many of your arguments.

 

[PoliticalChic]

First, bullshit. The courts have heard evidence before. The 'evidence' was laughable and lacked credibility.

"Republican challengers filed suit to try to stop the certification of Detroit’s election results. On Friday a Wayne County Circuit Court Judge Timothy Kenny denied their motion.

Judge Kenny said the plaintiff’s witnesses did not understand the ballot tabulation process, and quote, “No formal challenges were filed. However, sinister, fraudulent motives were ascribed to the process and the City of Detroit. Plaintiffs’ interpretation of events is incorrect and not credible.”

How then could Judge Kenny ruled....if no court has heard evidence before?

Second, you're literally using a ruling that DOESN'T EXIST as your proof of the validity of your imagination. As there's been no ruling on Moore vs Harper.

When you have to cite a ruling that DOESN'T EXIST to support your argument, you demonstrate why you have to abandon so many of your arguments.

No vulgarity, no matter how deeply I've destroyed your worldview.

 

[Skylar]

83% of people believe the election had 0 integrity. 55% believe the election was stolen. There is a thread on it. Your big lie has failed spectacularly.

53% of REPUBLICANS believe Trump. And these are the same hapless souls that swallowed the Birther Conspiracy.

Polling doesn't determine court cases. Evidence does. And Trump hasn't been able to produce shit to back up his Big Lie.

Good luck.

 

[Skylar]

No vulgarity, no matter how deeply I've destroyed your worldview.

Your personal interpretations of the constitution and court rulings taint no one's worldview but your own.

The state and federal courts have not found that McPherson nor the Supremacy Clause was violated by the 2020 election. The state and federal courts have not found that the 2020 election was stolen or illegitimate.

That's just you, citing you, insisting that your interpretations are the sole legal authority.

Nope. So much for your 'proof'.

 

[Lastamender]

53% of REPUBLICANS believe Trump. And these are the same hapless souls that swallowed the Birther Conspiracy.

Polling doesn't determine court cases. Evidence does. And Trump hasn't been able to produce shit to back up his Big Lie.

Good luck.

No it doesn't. It is still a fact the majority dio not give a fuck what the court says. Democrats do it all the time.

 

[Skylar]

No it doesn't. It is still a fact the majority dio not give a fuck what the court says. Democrats do it all the time.

Its not the public Trump has to convince. Its the courts. And his legal argument is dogshit.

The ability to file a lawsuit doesn't establish validity for that suit. As Trump, Gulliani and Sidney "Release the Kraken' Powell demonstrated elegantly with their inept and incompetent legal failures promoting the Big Lie.

Dominion on the other hand has had MUCH better progress with their suits.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Your personal interpretations of the constitution and court rulings taint no one's worldview but your own.

The state and federal courts have not found that McPherson nor the Supremacy Clause was violated by the 2020 election. The state and federal courts have not found that the 2020 election was stolen or illegitimate.

That's just you, citing you, insisting that your interpretations are the sole legal authority.

Nope. So much for your 'proof'.

What does the word 'exclusive' mean?

Which predominates, the Constitution or an state decree?

Answer the questions.

 

[Lastamender]

Its not the public Trump has to convince. Its the courts. And his legal argument is dogshit.

The ability to file a lawsuit doesn't establish validity for that suit. As Trump, Gulliani and Sidney "Release the Kraken' Powell demonstrated elegantly with their inept and incompetent legal failures promoting the Big Lie.

Dominion on the other hand has had MUCH better progress with their suits.

Until they have to reveal their source code.

and the public are the ones who will elect Trump for the third time.

 

[Skylar]

What does the word 'exclusive' mean?

Which predominates, the Constitution or an state decree?

Answer the questions.

Show me the court cases, state and federal, that found that the 2020 election violated McPherson or the Supremacy Clause.

You can't, as no court found this to be so. You're citing yourself......insisting that YOU and YOU alone get to define what a ruling or passage from the constitution is supposed to mean.

You don't. You're nobody. Try again.