SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
- 280
I notified the site of your pulling rank and falsely accusing me of Trolling. The post clearly presents data specific to the topic at hand and also directly addresses the subject of our latest few posts
So you are a crybaby and a tattletale as well?...not surprising. Of course, you are trolling....the OP of this post is a claim of an "overwhelming" body of data supporting the AGW hypothesis. Both Westwall and myself are asking for some of it....not all of it...not even a lot of it...just a piece of observed, measured, quantified, empirical data supporting the hypothesis...You then go on ad nauseum with some psychobabble that you are clearly cutting and pasting from the internet...but aren't delivering on the requests which relate directly to the OP...that is called trolling.
If you don't have the courage to face your own ignorance and openly discuss the issues at hand then thats fine, you are not required to participate in the discussion. However, acting like a five year old who can't have his way is hardly the way to fairly moderate a topic.
The issue at hand is your inability to provide us skeptics with the data we are asking for. If it exists...then show it to us and convince us that the AGW hypothesis has merit....That is as far from the syndrome you claim we suffer from as possible....far from claiming that I have all the answers and can learn nothing...I am asking for real world data to convince me...you can't deliver because it doesn't exist.
I don't do warnings, threaten me one time and I'm off to the owners. You are an ignorant and simply can't grasp the concepts involved.
You seem to be ignorant of the fact that you can't provide the first shred of observed, measured, quantified, empirical data to support the AGW hypothesis.