An "Epstein Client List" from those who would KNOW

[Mac1958]

Whether I'd believe it depends of the accusation, and the evidence. But I'd be very surprised if Clinton isn't deeply connected to Epstein's cabal. That's why Ds who are in a position to reveal this stuff haven't..

Wouldn't be surprising at all.

The rich and the powerful think they're above the law, and the law keeps proving them right.

 

[MisterBeale]

Or took advantage of an opportunity buying on the cheap.

True enough.

But now they are claiming he was FBI. I was just posing information on that topic.

 

[Delldude]

True enough.

But now they are claiming he was FBI. I was just posing information on that topic.

Being as He cooperated with the FBI mob investigations, that sale probably came around the same time frame...... so the feds could have given Him a hot tip.

 

[Dorian Mode]

Note to the right: Think about this argument critically. It is is very likely just a diversion tactic of the left to put Trump on the defensive so he has to waste time with this BS instead of continuing on full steam ahead with his demolition of the democrap party. We mustn't fall into troll traps meant to divert us from the necessary objectives. So, the number one rule when arguing with leftists is don't argue with leftists. What has arguing with leftists ever accomplished? Ignore them and instead let's keep our eyes on the prize: Democrap party demolition.

Note to the leftists: We don't care about your trolling BS. Get a life.

 

[YoursTruly]

Whether I'd believe it depends of the accusation, and the evidence. But I'd be very surprised if Clinton isn't deeply connected to Epstein's cabal. That's why Ds who are in a position to reveal this stuff haven't..

You gotta love how the Trump tribe is pointing fingers at the democrats who are either on the list or not pushing for the release of ALL the information, When it's Trump and his administration who's protecting those on the left, as much as those on the right.

Releasing the unredacted list, would probably expose Bill Clinton. But it would also expose those on the right. And those friendly towards those on the right.

Like the RNC donor John Paulson, who's also started running $2 million in ad's against Massie, in Kentucky.

Both sides are involved in this. But I think the left has a lot more new congressmen, who don't give a rats ass about the leadership of their own party or their donors. Especially since Pelosi has stepped down (somewhat) from her leadership role in congress.

On the other side of the isle, Trump has his political machine to challenge any Republican who goes against him. Not one of my GOP congressmen will even comment on this Epstein issue.

 

[Delldude]

You gotta love how the Trump tribe is pointing fingers at the democrats who are either on the list or not pushing for the release of ALL the information, When it's Trump and his administration who's protecting those on the left, as much as those on the right.

Releasing the unredacted list, would probably expose Bill Clinton. But it would also expose those on the right. And those friendly towards those on the right.

Like the RNC donor John Paulson, who's also started running $2 million in ad's against Massie, in Kentucky.

Both sides are involved in this. But I think the left has a lot more new congressmen, who don't give a rats ass about the leadership of their own party or their donors. Especially since Pelosi has stepped down (somewhat) from her leadership role in congress.

On the other side of the isle, Trump has his political machine to challenge any Republican who goes against him. Not one of my GOP congressmen will even comment on this Epstein issue.

You realize if everything is released the mantra is going to still be a coverup.

 

[YoursTruly]

Note to the right: Think about this argument critically. It is is very likely just a diversion tactic of the left to put Trump on the defensive so he has to waste time with this BS instead of continuing on full steam ahead with his demolition of the democrap party. We mustn't fall into troll traps meant to divert us from the necessary objectives. So, the number one rule when arguing with leftists is don't argue with leftists. What has arguing with leftists ever accomplished? Ignore them and instead let's keep our eyes on the prize: Democrap party demolition.

Note to the leftists: We don't care about your trolling BS. Get a life.

This Epstein thing isn't going away. Trump had his chance to do the right thing and release all the information, expose all that was involved. Including people in his own party. But he didn't. And now the democrats have the lead on this, and a few Republicans who still have a spine.

Not doing the right thing, is doing the wrong thing.

 

[dblack]

On the other side of the isle, Trump has his political machine to challenge any Republican who goes against him. Not one of my GOP congressmen will even comment on this Epstein issue.

Lockstep conformity.

 

[Dorian Mode]

This Epstein thing isn't going away. Trump had his chance to do the right thing and release all the information, expose all that was involved. Including people in his own party. But he didn't. And now the democrats have the lead on this, and a few Republicans who still have a spine.

Not doing the right thing, is doing the wrong thing.

What? I wasn't paying attention. Can you repeat that?

 

[YoursTruly]

Lockstep conformity.

And what sucks... Trump has done some good things. Although the good doesn't outnumber the bad, he's still done some things that have helped.

Cutting out the junk food for EBT.
Securing the border
Sending in the NG to these crime infested cities.

Why TF would he keep covering up this Epstein issue when there's still a year for the GOP to recover from the backlash. In fact, if he'd do the right thing, right now, this may just save the GOP from losing their asses in next years mid terms.

Trump's never been shy about calling out members of his own party. IE Thomas Massie, Rand Paul, Chip Roy etc etc etc...... So this makes me think he was involved with the trafficking. Maybe had him an underaged girl or two.

 

[Dorian Mode]

You realize if everything is released the mantra is going to still be a coverup.

And then the coverup becomes the next diversion. Eyes on the prize! While the democraps are trying to divert attention from their failing POS party, we have to stay focused and keep pushing out the facts about how bad their party has become and why it would be really bad to vote for any of them in the midterms.

 

[leftwinger]

Another "she said" something happened 30 yrs ago. No Police report then, no arrests, but talk now? Why now?

 

[Blisterfinger]

Of course you don't. You suck Trump. He wants to cover it up, so you want to cover it up.

Nah I'm just not interested in your sensationalism. You believed in Biden so you have no credibility. When it comes down to it you are just a piece of shit with nothing

 

[Delldude]

Another "she said" something happened 30 yrs ago. No Police report then, no arrests, but talk now? Why now?

Cue up Gloria Allred.

 

[dblack]

And then the coverup becomes the next diversion. Eyes on the prize! While the democraps are trying to divert attention from their failing POS party, we have to stay focused and keep pushing out the facts about how bad their party has become and why it would be really bad to vote for any of them in the midterms.

You partisan idiots are killing the country. You dumb motherfuckers actually think the other "side", of your precious little two-party pissing match, is a greater threat to the country than foreign enemies like Russia or China (those countries love you, by the way).

 

[OldFlame]

If reviewing known facts is a rabbit hole? Then you are correct.

If, OTH, you never watched the video I posted to you, then your ad hom attacks on me make sense.

I didn't see a video, I saw an 1100 page book. Who are he authors sources for what is in the book? How do we know those sources are relating 'facts', what physical evidence is there to back up their 'facts'? I won't waste my time reading an 1100 page conspiracy theory.

 

[dblack]

Nah I'm just not interested in your sensationalism. You believed in Biden so you have no credibility.

That's the thing. I didn't. I'm not a Democrat. So, I have plenty of credibility, and I say MAGA sucks ass.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Another "she said" something happened 30 yrs ago. No Police report then, no arrests, but talk now? Why now?

Uh... Epstein was s tried and convicted once... on his way to a second trial when he died... are you sure you're living in the same dimension as the rest of us?

 

[leftwinger]

Uh... Epstein was s tried and convicted once... on his way to a second trial when he died... are you sure you're living in the same dimension as the rest of us?

You clowns chirping today wanting more 30 year old heresay stories. Name names! What is Trump hiding'! Nice deflection by Stain.

From Tues. Did you read all this? Here You Go. The First Batch Of 33,000 Just Released

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You clowns chirping today wanting more 30 year old heresay stories.

I didnt say that.

I called out your bizarre lie.

You're making up lies to over for your favorite fat rapist.

Its very weird, and you should feel a bit embarrassed.