An "Epstein Client List" from those who would KNOW

[Dragonlady]

Anyone can compile a list. I doubt they have much proof of anything other than accusations.

Golly Gee you sound like a total asshole who has just been caught with your dick in your hand.

For 6 years Republicans can made lists of all of the "bribes" received by the Biden family and you believed those lists, even though they had ZERO evidence.

Why aren't you prepared to believe these women. They have NO REASON TO LIE.

 

[Dragonlady]

WARNING ISSUED OFF topic:



They just won't give up on illegally attacking Trump. Appealing the appeal that threw out the verdicts? They ought to be fined and jailed themselves for Libel or something?

New York Attorney General Letitia James on Thursday appealed a court’s decision to toss out a $500 million penalty on President Donald Trump and his company in connection with business fraud.

Nobody threw out the verdicts against Trump. The verdict was not thrown out, only the fine, which the court declared "excessive". Trump is still guilty.

 

[Mac1958]

Golly Gee you sound like a total asshole who has just been caught with your dick in your hand.

For 6 years Republicans can made lists of all of the "bribes" received by the Biden family and you believed those lists, even though they had ZERO evidence.

Why aren't you prepared to believe these women. They have NO REASON TO LIE.

I think they just want to discredit the whole thing because Epstein and their deity were pals.

They only worry about being "moral" when there's some kind of perceived political advantage in it for them.

 

[OldFlame]

No, youre in a tailspin, now.

Trump actually called the democrat politicians' call for the release of the files a hoax.

Which of course would get him an F on a 5th grade vocabulary quiz.

And since the above is neither a hoax NOR a narrative, you would be repeating 5th grade with him.

If you want to word it that way, you can.. The 'democrats' had 4 years to release whatever they wanted if they wanted it released that badly. They're doing it for the media attention and to keep the 'story' in the media because they have nothing else to bash Trump with, and they have nothing positive to say about themselves. A hoax..

 

[OldFlame]

From your POV.

Why Some Rape Victims Continue to Date Their Rapist

Several factors can explain this surprising behavior.

www.psychologytoday.com

Reasons People Stay in Abusive Situations

If you're in an abusive relationship, there may be reasons why you stay. You can find out here.

psychcentral.com

I'd say from most people's point of view. She wanted a modeling/acting career, that's what she used him for. She's doing a podcast now and wants exposure for that. She makes a mockery out of those girls that were really abused.

 

[TNHarley]

Well if you read the entire article, I'm not sure how you come away with a different viewpoint.

I guess it was the fact that she had unwanted sex and received settlements.

 

[OldFlame]

Perhaps. I don't understand why folks don't want this information made public.

If she has not had a settlement against the Epstein estate, this would go a long way to finding justice.

I think most of you are misinterpreting (some intentionally) what those on the right are saying in these threads, they're not saying the info should not be released, they're saying that those on the left are hypocrites since they had 4 years to release whatever they wanted, and they didn't. I'm for everything being released, so does that somehow preclude me from commenting on why it hasn't been thru a D administration that had 4 years to do exactly that? I don't think so.

Also, none of us have any idea why both admins are withholding certain files, and everyone conveniently forgets that the release was blocked by a federal judge as well.

 

[OldFlame]

Well, prosecutors have commented that releasing a bunch of unevidenced accusations puts innocent people at risk.

We also know that releasing raw investigative material is very unethical.

Wow, hell froze over, we agree.

 

[Mac1958]

This is just a given, isn't it?

BREAKING: OMG: DOJ Deputy Chief Says Government will “Redact Every Republican” While Leaving All “Democrat People” on Epstein Client List (VIDEO)

The DOJ official told an OMG journalist that the government will redact Republican names and release the Democrat names on the Epstein client list.




Per the O’Keefe Media Group:

He further revealed new information regarding Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell. “She got transferred to a minimum security prison,” Schnitt said, despite her conviction as a sex offender. “It’s against BOP policy because she’s a convicted sex offender. And they’re not supposed to get minimum security prisons, which is an interesting detail because she’s getting a benefit, which means they’re offering her something to keep her mouth shut.”

Schnitt also revealed internal conflict within federal law enforcement over the release of said files. “The head of FBI [Kash Patel] really wants to… second-in-command [Dan Bongino] at FBI has been causing problems, because he’s like, ‘No, these [Epstein Files] have to be released.’ He added, “The FBI wants them out. The top two guys that will do it. But they work for Bondi, so… Bondi wants whatever Trump wants. Internally there’s a lot of conflict.”

Despite public assurances that the government has been transparent, Schnitt admitted that nothing substantive has been revealed: “Whatever they’ve released has already been publicly released anyway, so they haven’t released anything new. Even though they were the ones that were claiming that they were going to release everything.”

OMG has reached out to the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Joseph Schnitt regarding Schnitt’s statements.

 

[OldFlame]

I guess it was the fact that she had unwanted sex and received settlements.

How does one have 'unwanted sex' without force involved? She admitted she went to his house and his office, knowing what would happen. Maybe he told her the gravy train would stop if she didn't, but that's on her.

 

[leftwinger]

I think they just want to discredit the whole thing because Epstein and their deity were pals.

They only worry about being "moral" when there's some kind of perceived political advantage in it for them.

Trump or Clinton were never on the island. What do you want from us? Explain Clintons' plane rides if you must keep at it.

 

[WEATHER53]

How does one have 'unwanted sex' without force involved? She admitted she went to his house and his office, knowing what would happen. Maybe he told her the gravy train would stop if she didn't, but that's on her.

There is tons of hyperbole and typical misuse of words.
“Epstein survivors”-who did he kill??’
“Unwanted sex”-it was sought at the time but in hindsight is now unwanted.
That majority were 18 or older and did repeat visits because it benefitted them. Very few have been identified as 14-17 years of age.

 

[Blisterfinger]

All the more reason to release them now then surely. Who said anything about incriminating trump anyway? he promised to release them when he had no power too, now that he has the power too he won't release them - he's sacred of something, that's beyond obvious FFS.

We should be scared when our own president is scared to do something he promised to do.

A federal judge told Trump not to release them. Do you want him to break the law?

 

[leftwinger]

Where can I get $10million after taxes and lawyer fees for some "unwanted sex" with free room and board?

 

[dblack]

Sad watching the apologists dancing around defending their creeps.

 

[leftwinger]

Yawning........ah.....nothing new here.

I am going to go with Dershowitz and Maxwell statements until I hear differently. So far the chicks statements back them up 100%.
I am going to ignore the troll taunting the Okeefe group (Cheese fell for it). Without verification the "DOJ official" could be a Globalist plant or a Board Stain?

Feel free to change my minds by posting FACTS. No more YES-SHeeat-Sherlock type fantasy statements.
case closed until it reopens per me. Supreme_Leader, as always.//

 

[WEATHER53]

Where can I get $10million after taxes and lawyer fees for some "unwanted sex" with free room and board?

It’s a great gig but sours after 20+ years later

 

[jc456]

All the more reason to release them now then surely. Who said anything about incriminating trump anyway? he promised to release them when he had no power too, now that he has the power too he won't release them - he's sacred of something, that's beyond obvious FFS.

We should be scared when our own president is scared to do something he promised to do.

what if there aren't any new files?

 

[TNHarley]

How does one have 'unwanted sex' without force involved? She admitted she went to his house and his office, knowing what would happen. Maybe he told her the gravy train would stop if she didn't, but that's on her.

She was manipulated, Gaslighted. Plus, SHE WAS 16. She was a child. Good grief!

 

[Rawley]

She was manipulated, Gaslighted. Plus, SHE WAS 16. She was a child. Good grief!

She was 21 when she first met Epstein.