An "Epstein Client List" from those who would KNOW

OK, Looks like the DOJ is still loaded with OBiden disgruntled commee holdovers? Spouting off caught on tape to Okeefe? Could it be valid? I would doubt it. Trump regime is not flat out dishonest like the communists Obiden are? *************Good story on GP so I suppose you board Elitist will call it fake news? Sod off, the lot of you.

*****************************

TEASER:
The O’Keefe Media Group on Friday released an undercover video of a DOJ official admitting the government will redact every single Republican while leaving all the liberal Democrats on the Epstein client list.

“They’ll [DOJ] redact every Republican or conservative person in those files, leave all the liberal, Democratic people in those files, and have a very slanted version of it come out… without really seeing any of their bad behavior,” admitted Joseph Schnitt, DOJ Acting Deputy Chief at the Office of Enforcement Operations.

“There’s thousands and thousands of page-open files,” Schnitt said. “If they’re released in any way, it’s going to be very redacted.”

This too was attached.
 
well the Bank settled, not Epstein, if I read it right. Not sure what that has to do with Epstein.
Perhaps. I don't understand why folks don't want this information made public.

If she has not had a settlement against the Epstein estate, this would go a long way to finding justice.
 
Perhaps. I don't understand why folks don't want this information made public.

If she has not had a settlement against the Epstein estate, this would go a long way to finding justice.
Well, prosecutors have commented that releasing a bunch of unevidenced accusations puts innocent people at risk.

We also know that releasing raw investigative material is very unethical.
 
OK, Looks like the DOJ is still loaded with OBiden disgruntled commee holdovers? Spouting off caught on tape to Okeefe? Could it be valid? I would doubt it. Trump regime is not flat out dishonest like the communists Obiden are? *************Good story on GP so I suppose you board Elitist will call it fake news? Sod off, the lot of you.

*****************************

TEASER:
The O’Keefe Media Group on Friday released an undercover video of a DOJ official admitting the government will redact every single Republican while leaving all the liberal Democrats on the Epstein client list.

“They’ll [DOJ] redact every Republican or conservative person in those files, leave all the liberal, Democratic people in those files, and have a very slanted version of it come out… without really seeing any of their bad behavior,” admitted Joseph Schnitt, DOJ Acting Deputy Chief at the Office of Enforcement Operations.

“There’s thousands and thousands of page-open files,” Schnitt said. “If they’re released in any way, it’s going to be very redacted.”

This too was attached.

Good find.

BREAKING: DOJ Deputy Chief Admits Dept. Will “Redact Every Republican” on Epstein List​



1757007297859.webp
 
Well, prosecutors have commented that releasing a bunch of inevidenced accusations puts innocent peope at risk.

We also know that releasing raw investigative material is very unethical.
So you stand with the right who want the corruption to continue?


Noted.
 
OK, Looks like the DOJ is still loaded with holdovers? Spouting off caught on tape to Okeefe? Or it could be valid? I would doubt it.*************Good story on GP so I suppose you board Elitist will call it fake news? Sod off, the lot of you.

*****************************

TEASER:
The O’Keefe Media Group on Friday released an undercover video of a DOJ official admitting the government will redact every single Republican while leaving all the liberal Democrats on the Epstein client list.

“They’ll [DOJ] redact every Republican or conservative person in those files, leave all the liberal, Democratic people in those files, and have a very slanted version of it come out… without really seeing any of their bad behavior,” admitted Joseph Schnitt, DOJ Acting Deputy Chief at the Office of Enforcement Operations.

“There’s thousands and thousands of page-open files,” Schnitt said. “If they’re released in any way, it’s going to be very redacted.”

This too was attached.

seriously, you believe that nonsense? hahahaahahahahahahahahah, who's the guy, an acting dude, sure looks like he be acting. I don't believe he's anything but a nutjob.
 
Perhaps. I don't understand why folks don't want this information made public.
What information? What is it you know exists because you've seen it? I want people punished, like I wanted Diddy punished, but we just watched a jury let him off. Not sure what it is you think is there.
 
Again for the thick-headed, if the files would have incriminated Trump Biden would have released them.
All the more reason to release them now then surely. Who said anything about incriminating trump anyway? he promised to release them when he had no power too, now that he has the power too he won't release them - he's sacred of something, that's beyond obvious FFS.

We should be scared when our own president is scared to do something he promised to do.
 
Perhaps. I don't understand why folks don't want this information made public.

If she has not had a settlement against the Epstein estate, this would go a long way to finding justice.


I saw yesterday CHASE and JP Morgan each settled for $100s of millions as they ran Epstien accounts? Seems crazy to blame the banks for what Epstien was up to? Sounds very Obiden like debanking MyPillow and others.,
 
No, I think that conclusion follows logical analysis from your bullshit responses.
No you don't, nor could you draw that logical line if your life depended on it.

It's a non sequitur, and it's the refuge of intellectually lazy and/or incapable people.

You said you dont understand why people dont want the files released. I directly addressed that.

Sounds to me like you were lying and already had your mind made up, given your non sequitur.
 
seriously, you believe that nonsense? hahahaahahahahahahahahah, who's the guy, an acting dude, sure looks like he be acting. I don't believe he's anything but a nutjob.

I don't know. I only report what I find. Throwing "the BigMacs" a bone. They know who Okeefe is. They could be playing him now. Or this guy could be a legit disgruntled holdover tossing sand in the Vaseline like a Boardstain would do.

Yes, it seems preposterous and I would not think Trump would sign off on such a bad action. I don't think his regime is dishonest like those in the past....but I have been wrong often. GWB, McCain and Mittens come to mind.
 
Last edited:
15th post
With lies.
Yet you couldn't argue what was a lie or why if your life depended on it.

You simply didnt hear what you wanted to hear, and now you're having a baby tantrum.

The things I mentioned are indeed why some people dont think the raw materials should be released.
 
From your POV.


Of all the confused and convoluted aspects of human sexuality none can be as ununderstood or unhealthy with as the female rape fantasy.

Why do some rape victims continue to date their rapists? It's not simple. It is uncomplicated. It's not their rapist. It's their pirate. It's their rogue Duke who treats women like dishrags, until.....HER. The romance shelf is filled with books referred to as 'bodice rippers". A woman who has been raped and asks her rapist to spend the night isn't pretending it never happened. She wants him to do it again. Preferably with her tied up and blindfolded. Just like in the last book she read.

Of course this doesn't mean every rape is a rape fantasy, some are devastating, traumatic, fearful experiences. But enough of them are that a whole genre of bodice ripper fantasies exist.

One of the better ways of stopping rape would be to convince women that being raped is not fun. It's not exciting. Stop reading those books.
 
WARNING ISSUED OFF topic:



They just won't give up on illegally attacking Trump. Appealing the appeal that threw out the verdicts? They ought to be fined and jailed themselves for Libel or something?


New York Attorney General Letitia James on Thursday appealed a court’s decision to toss out a $500 million penalty on President Donald Trump and his company in connection with business fraud.
 
All the more reason to release them now then surely. Who said anything about incriminating trump anyway? he promised to release them when he had no power too, now that he has the power too he won't release them - he's sacred of something, that's beyond obvious FFS.

We should be scared when our own president is scared to do something he promised to do.

Warning issued on making false statements. I am watching you......watching you tight. You don't want to get "on the list" lil' man.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom