OldFlame
Diamond Member
- Aug 5, 2020
- 12,585
- 10,166
- 2,138
No, I think they did not name names because the men are politically connected
So both the Biden and Trump DOJ are corrupt, they have the evidence but will not prosecute?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, I think they did not name names because the men are politically connected
For the thousandth time, Einstein: Maybe Biden was covering for something or someone. Maybe Clinton.You still haven't figured out that if Trump were involved here, the Democrats would have released it while Biden was in office, eh?
Always been that waySo both the Biden and Trump DOJ are corrupt, they have the evidence but will not prosecute?
Trump will prosper and is not going to be brought down by anyone but Christ himself, casting him in to the Lake of Fire, in my humble opinion!But of course, only time will tell....
![]()
You still haven't figured out that if Trump were involved here, the Democrats would have released it while Biden was in office, eh?
Always been that way
Clinton? Who?For the thousandth time, Einstein: Maybe Biden was covering for something or someone. Maybe Clinton.
Yes - he's a troll.Quit responding to his bullshit, that's what he wants.
Lie to us some more.The Trumpsters are going after the victims.
Yeah. I didn't read the article, but I saw a headline that inferred that there was someone in England running interference for him.Even if they did come back, they were minors
There were pictures of Prince Andrew with the woman in question. Hard to deny.
Why did Biden "dismiss the whole ugly case" for 4 years? Especially if Trump is in the files.This is about far more than politics for them. Like other cults, they'll defend it even if it destroys their families. It's a full lifestyle, a culture, a separate, insulated, self-contained ecosystem.
They're willing to dismiss this whole ugly case because of one guy, whether he was actually involved or not. Not good.
But his trolling really isn't successful and does more damage to the progressives here than the rest. He is joining in making the entire left look like TDS loons. The truth is, all this is just an attempt at diversion to keep people from discussing how poorly the entire democrap party is doing and how well the Trump admin is doing. But this desperate diversion just proves that the democrap party is circling the drain. Whenever we ask a valid question about a member of the democrap party, the only response is But... But... Trump!!!! Trump's doing the flushing.Quit responding to his bullshit, that's what he wants. Read thru this, just read his posts, it's the same post saying the same thing over and over again, that's all he cares about. He has zero interest in discussing the actual topic, all it is to him is something to get off on trolling Trump supporters. Every post of his in here is exactly that, he ignores everything else. I have to wonder when others on here are going to figure that out and quit interacting with him? Maybe they have nothing better to do as well. who knows, but I'm out.
Between Tater and Trump, only one of them has called for the release of all the files.For the thousandth time, Einstein: Maybe Biden was covering for something or someone. Maybe Clinton.
I wonder how many times that dumb question (and clumsy attempt at deflection) has been answered.
Decent people want those involved to be held accountable. Anyone. Trumpsters are fighting it.

And you act like you are informed.Yeah. I didn't read the article, but I saw a headline that inferred





Not at all…just not ready to go gaga over what a few twisted tramps with daddy issues say about decades old happenings.Look at you, all ready to defend kid fuckers.
Seems like you are. Talking trash about the victims.Not at all…just not ready to go gaga over what a few twisted tramps with daddy issues say about decades old happenings.
Didn’t we already try that shit with the *****-hat rockin #MeToo’ers?
that means absolutely nothing in here. You treat it as it is true. So I ask again, what is your evidence? It ought not to be that hard, you are so fking convinced. Share it.I can see that the simple qualifier "supposedly" is beyond you.
No surprise.
well the post with the lady wasn't a kid, so, she doesn't qualify to your post. His post was on the 20 year old. I bet you also don't know that 16 year girls prostitute. What a shame and sad. But that is true. All you need to do is present a case where anyone but Epstein is involved. You seem to have evidence, share it.Look at you, all ready to defend kid fuckers.
which victims? the 20 year old?Seems like you are. Talking trash about the victims.
do you know what happened? wow, it's amazing how you fkers know what no one else actually can prove. Just prove anyone besides Epstein, those victims have been around for decades, no one ever said a word. Now you'll just say they were scared. They went after Epstein and Maxwell, seemed they were the power. I mean, it's you who claims there's a list.Of COURSE they are scarred, dumb ass. Look at what happened to them!