America's enemies want Kamala to win.

[MarathonMike]

Who is rooting for Kamala to win? Xi Jinping and China. Kim Jung Un. The Mullahs and Ayatollah of Iran. The Taliban. ISIS. The Mexican Drug Cartels. The Mexican Government. Maduro. Soooooo......

Kamala supporters should think for a change and wonder why ALL of America's enemies want Kamala in the White House and the Democrats to remain in power.

 

[Oddball]

Murica's biggest enemies aren't in far flung commie nations.

 

[Crepitus]

Murica's biggest enemies aren't in far flung commie nations.


View attachment 1011833

Yup. They occupy post numbers 1 and 2 in this thread.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

 

[Foxfyre]

Who is rooting for Kamala to win? Xi Jinping and China. Kim Jung Un. The Mullahs and Ayatollah of Iran. The Taliban. ISIS. The Mexican Drug Cartels. The Mexican Government. Maduro. Soooooo......

Kamala supporters should think for a change and wonder why ALL of America's enemies want Kamala in the White House and the Democrats to remain in power.

And add to that list I'm pretty sure Putin would prefer a Kamala government as he preferred a Biden government who is much weaker in dealing with Russia that Trump was or would be. The only possible reason I can think of that Putin would prefer Trump at this juncture is because he wants a way out of the Ukraine/Russia conflict and be able to save face and might see Trump as the opportunity to be able to do that.

 

[two_iron]

Maybe the plan is to make our enemies dizzy and pass out?

What the fuck else could it be? Listen to this and see if you get light-headed.

Have medical assistance in close proximity, you're going to be a test subject.

DISCLAIMER: This is for informational purposes only. No wagering.

 

[MarathonMike]

And add to that list I'm pretty sure Putin would prefer a Kamala government as he preferred a Biden government who is much weaker in dealing with Russia that Trump was or would be. The only possible reason I can think of that Putin would prefer Trump at this juncture is because he wants a way out of the Ukraine/Russia conflict and be able to save face and might see Trump as the opportunity to be able to do that.

Putin would have a difficult time not laughing in Kamala's face. I don't think her stories about growing up middle class in a single parent home will impress him.

 

[Winston]

Who is rooting for Kamala to win? Xi Jinping and China. Kim Jung Un. The Mullahs and Ayatollah of Iran. The Taliban. ISIS. The Mexican Drug Cartels. The Mexican Government. Maduro. Soooooo......

Kamala supporters should think for a change and wonder why ALL of America's enemies want Kamala in the White House and the Democrats to remain in power.

Where do you get this shit from? Or do you just make shit up.

Why China Is Rooting for Trump

Beijing’s long game would be much better served by the candidate’s policies and the divisions he would unleash.

foreignpolicy.com

https://www.npr.org/2024/02/28/1233985916/north-korea-diplomacy-trump-germany-former-ambassador

China, North Korea, solidly in the Trump camp, and of course Russia. And the typical uninformed American. You probably couldn't find Iran on a damn globe. You certainly don't realize they just completed a presidential election a few months ago because their sitting president was killed in a helicopter crash.

Iran’s Presidential Candidates Agree on One Thing: Trump Is Coming

The former U.S. president’s election is treated as a foregone conclusion, with the six contenders clashing over who is best suited to handling him.

www.nytimes.com

 

[alang1216]

View attachment 1011836

The corollary is also true: "If your love for one man is greater than you love for our country, you are officially part of the problem".

 

[Winston]

And add to that list I'm pretty sure Putin would prefer a Kamala government as he preferred a Biden government who is much weaker in dealing with Russia that Trump was or would be. The only possible reason I can think of that Putin would prefer Trump at this juncture is because he wants a way out of the Ukraine/Russia conflict and be able to save face and might see Trump as the opportunity to be able to do that.

Holy shit, now that takes the damn cake. Do you people live with your head up your ass? I mean just asking.

https://www.npr.org/2024/09/04/nx-s1-5100329/us-russia-election-interference-bots-2024

Trump could end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours, BY GIVING UKRAINE TO RUSSIA. I mean claiming Russia wants Harris to win is about the dumbest damn thing I have seen posted in a long ass time. You got Trump groveling at Putin's feet, and you got Vance, wanted to discontinue aid to Ukraine. I mean how flippin damn stupid is the claim that Russia wants Harris to win. You are a flippin moron.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

The corollary is also true: "If your love for one man is greater than you love for our country, you are officially part of the problem".

I will vote for him because he puts America FIRST, not Hatian pet eaters

 

[alang1216]

I will vote for him because he puts America FIRST, not Hatian pet eaters

He certainly claims to put America first but I don't see his actions matching his words. A recent example is the immigration bill he killed. It may have been flawed but it certainly something the Right wanted. Biden put the country first by dropping out. Got any examples of Trump putting the country first?

 

[Winston]

Hatian pet eater

 

[JohnDB]

Anonymous is not in favor of Kamala.....this could get painful.

 

[mudwhistle]

And add to that list I'm pretty sure Putin would prefer a Kamala government as he preferred a Biden government who is much weaker in dealing with Russia that Trump was or would be. The only possible reason I can think of that Putin would prefer Trump at this juncture is because he wants a way out of the Ukraine/Russia conflict and be able to save face and might see Trump as the opportunity to be able to do that.

 

[otto105]

Who is rooting for Kamala to win? Xi Jinping and China. Kim Jung Un. The Mullahs and Ayatollah of Iran. The Taliban. ISIS. The Mexican Drug Cartels. The Mexican Government. Maduro. Soooooo......

Kamala supporters should think for a change and wonder why ALL of America's enemies want Kamala in the White House and the Democrats to remain in power.

Hilarious

That you fail to mention the pootin. Also, aren’t the Taliban very tough fighters?

Dude, don’t put fat Elvis’ love for dictators on display. Kim junk Un will just send him more large type letters with big pictures…

 

[buckeye]

A recent example is the immigration bill he killed. It may have been flawed but it certainly something the Right wanted.

No, the right didn't want it. I certainly don't favor it.

I favor closing the border for real and stopping allowing any illegals through. You want to come to America, great, apply for a visa and get in line just like almost all countries of the world do.

 

[alang1216]

No, the right didn't want it. I certainly don't favor it.

I favor closing the border for real and stopping allowing any illegals through. You want to come to America, great, apply for a visa and get in line just like almost all countries of the world do.

Which of these didn't you want?

The agreement included over $20 billion for border security. The agreement would provide critical resources at the border and significant policy changes, including:

1. Border Patrol: Border Patrol staffing has remained roughly flat over the last four years, despite border encounters increasing by 250 percent over the same period. Today, there are just shy of 20,000 Border Patrol Agents. The bipartisan Senate bill would add more than 1,500 new Customs and Border Protection personnel
2. Asylum Officers and Asylum Reform: Similarly, Asylum Officer staffing has remained stagnant over the last four years and there is an insufficient number of asylum officers to do initial screenings. As a result, each asylum case generally takes 5 to 7 years to be heard and adjudicated. Today, there are approximately 1,000 Asylum Officers; the bipartisan Senate bill would add an additional 4,300 Asylum Officers and it would make the asylum process faster and fairer.
3. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): ICE detention facilities are currently over capacity. Today, ICE has approximately 40,000 detention beds. The bipartisan Senate agreement would increase detention beds to a total of 50,000. Moreover, without immediate action from Congress DHS will need to move funding to ICE from other critical missions or reduce ICE’s enforcement operations to manage a shortfall of several hundred million dollars.
4. Immigration Judges: Currently there is a backlog of over 2 million cases for immigration judges. Each asylum case generally takes 5 to 7 years to complete. Without more judges, these timelines and backlogs will continue to grow. Today there is funding for 734 immigration judges, the bipartisan Senate bill would provide funding for an additional 100 immigration judges and their associated staff.
5. Combatting Drug Trafficking: The bipartisan agreement would fund the installation of 100 cutting-edge inspection machines to help detect fentanyl at our Southwest Border ports of entry. It would also give the President the authority to impose sanctions on foreign nationals knowingly involved in significant trafficking of fentanyl by a transnational criminal organization.
6. The bill also includes $1.4 billion for cities and states who are providing critical services to newcomers, and would expedite work permits for people who are in the country and qualify.

 

[buckeye]

Which of these didn't you want?

The agreement included over $20 billion for border security. The agreement would provide critical resources at the border and significant policy changes, including:

1. Border Patrol: Border Patrol staffing has remained roughly flat over the last four years, despite border encounters increasing by 250 percent over the same period. Today, there are just shy of 20,000 Border Patrol Agents. The bipartisan Senate bill would add more than 1,500 new Customs and Border Protection personnel
2. Asylum Officers and Asylum Reform: Similarly, Asylum Officer staffing has remained stagnant over the last four years and there is an insufficient number of asylum officers to do initial screenings. As a result, each asylum case generally takes 5 to 7 years to be heard and adjudicated. Today, there are approximately 1,000 Asylum Officers; the bipartisan Senate bill would add an additional 4,300 Asylum Officers and it would make the asylum process faster and fairer.
3. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): ICE detention facilities are currently over capacity. Today, ICE has approximately 40,000 detention beds. The bipartisan Senate agreement would increase detention beds to a total of 50,000. Moreover, without immediate action from Congress DHS will need to move funding to ICE from other critical missions or reduce ICE’s enforcement operations to manage a shortfall of several hundred million dollars.
4. Immigration Judges: Currently there is a backlog of over 2 million cases for immigration judges. Each asylum case generally takes 5 to 7 years to complete. Without more judges, these timelines and backlogs will continue to grow. Today there is funding for 734 immigration judges, the bipartisan Senate bill would provide funding for an additional 100 immigration judges and their associated staff.
5. Combatting Drug Trafficking: The bipartisan agreement would fund the installation of 100 cutting-edge inspection machines to help detect fentanyl at our Southwest Border ports of entry. It would also give the President the authority to impose sanctions on foreign nationals knowingly involved in significant trafficking of fentanyl by a transnational criminal organization.
6. The bill also includes $1.4 billion for cities and states who are providing critical services to newcomers, and would expedite work permits for people who are in the country and qualify.

We don't need extra border patrol. Let them do their job, stop handcuffing them, tell the world that our border is closed and then CLOSE IT. Stop accusing them of whipping illegals when all they're trying to do is direct their horse.

The only reason we had record breaking illegals here during the Biden/Harris administration is because the entire world (except for democrats) knew the border was open, knew that illegals would be welcomed with open arms, given tremendous welfare, a cell phone and a ride to anywhere they wanted to go in the US.

Close the border, nobody crosses it unless they are American citizens or legal residents, JUST LIKE MOST COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD.

 

[alang1216]

We don't need extra border patrol. Let them do their job, stop handcuffing them, tell the world that our border is closed and then CLOSE IT. Stop accusing them of whipping illegals when all they're trying to do is direct their horse.

The only reason we had record breaking illegals here during the Biden/Harris administration is because the entire world (except for democrats) knew the border was open, knew that illegals would be welcomed with open arms, given tremendous welfare, a cell phone and a ride to anywhere they wanted to go in the US.

Close the border, nobody crosses it unless they are American citizens or legal residents, JUST LIKE MOST COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD.

Wrong. Most countries allow for asylum immigration under international law, though the specifics of the process vary greatly by country.

International Obligations:​

• 1951 Refugee Convention: The right to seek asylum is protected under the United Nations' 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol, which define who is considered a refugee and the rights they are entitled to. Most countries have signed these treaties and are therefore obligated to provide protection to individuals fleeing persecution based on race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.
• Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 14): This declaration, adopted by the UN in 1948, recognizes the right of individuals to seek asylum from persecution in other countries.