Skull Pilot
Diamond Member
- Nov 17, 2007
- 45,446
- 6,163
- 1,830
I don't like being condescending but after reading your comments on this thread it is very hard not to be. You don't know what you are talking about, it's pretty clear... I'll stop trying to explain, you can keep on thinking you are right if it helps you sleep at night.I guess it is still going over your head... I'll try and make it real simple. You are advocating for a fair flat tax, but you fail to understand the purpose of taxation. It isn't a "pay to use" system. Taxation is how our treasury removes currency from the economy to balance spending and maintain a strong value for the dollar. The purpose of spending is to provide safety, security, and opportunity for its citizens. Most people agree that a strong middle class and small business class is the foundation of a strong economy. Because of this, taxation should not be aimed at the poor, middle, or small business classes. As new money enters the market it funnels up to the "owners" or the top % of earners. This creates a massive imbalance of wealth which is a problem on many levels (economically speaking) This is why it is both smart and fair to have a progressive tax plan aimed at removing currency by means of taxing that top % and not pulling from the pockets of our poor, middle class, and small businesses. I realize I am being repetitive but you are failing to show understanding so I'm trying to make it as easy as possible... get it now?I'm keeping up just fine... You seem to have a hard time following. Try reading slower and learning a thing or two about economics.And yet you say this and I quote
if they do downsize then that opens the market for more competition which is a good thing if our system can support small business growth
Seems like you can't even keep up with the shit you say
Yeah you end your post with a statement on small business growth but you aren't talking about small business got it
Condescending dick I don't need you to explain anything to me
Anyone who wants to can get a piece of that so called new money.
And if we are going to have a tax on an earned dollar then all those dollars should be treated exactly the same. There is no diminishing marginal utility of a dollar.
And under any flat tax plan the people making the most would still be paying the most the only difference is that the people getting a free ride will now have to pay their share. A progressive tax is patently unfair as it is never justified to take 40% of a portion of anyone's income
The one and only legitimate purpose for taxes is to fund lawful government expenditures. We can argue what those expenditures should be but the tax code is not used merely to raise revenue to fund lawful government expenditures anymore. Instead it is used as a blunt tool wielded by ham handed bureaucrats to coerce certain behaviors and to enforce some arbitrary standard of "fairness"