American Jim Crow & Racism Explained

[Asclepias]

I didnt answer it. I said you wont hear anything new if you are too under educated to listen to it.

Your refusal to specific anything "new" he might have said, tells me that he says nothing new.

That you like it, tells me what the gist of it is.

That was your answer.


And it tells me everything I need to know about that vid.

I cant tell you what is "new" to you. I cant read your mind. Your resistance against education is typical of those with low education. Information wont harm you.

You know that I have heard all the standard bullshit lectures from the left on Race

You know that this video does nothing but rehash them.


But you don't want to admit that, because that would be telling the Truth.


And doing that, would violate your deal with Satan.

This is where your ignorance and resistance against education comes in. Its not a lecture. Its just facts.

Sure it is.

You'll never know being resistant to education. Not my fault you wish to remain ignorant and uneducated.

 

[depotoo]

The 2015 top 10 racist cities, according to hate crime rates.

10. St Paul
9. Las Vegas
8. Indianapolis
7. Kansas City
6. Phoenix
5. Los Angeles
4. New York City
3. Seattle
2. Boston
1. Columbus



They all have one thing in common. Las Vegas did vote in a Republican mayor in late 2015.

 

[Pogo]

I'll translate for Frank:

"NOOO! History? NOOO! "

And I love the way Frank puts his post up TWO MINUTES after the OP ...... with a video that takes seventeen minutes to watch.

BUSTED.

I said I wasn't catering to his absurd racist notions, why they **** would I watch a stupid video?

I'm gonna go waaaaaaaaaaaaay out on a limb here and hazard a guess: "to know what the **** you're talking about when you post".

Yes or No: We just had a black guy as President of the USA

Where is that in the video? Gimme a time stamp.

Come on. Youre not going to fall for his deflection? He cant speak on the information in the video because it changes his world view to listen to it.

Oh I know. I like to toss questions that can't be answered. But I give them too much credit for being able to figure out why it can't be answered. This one doesn't seem to have penetrated the cranium.

 

[Correll]

Your refusal to specific anything "new" he might have said, tells me that he says nothing new.

That you like it, tells me what the gist of it is.

That was your answer.


And it tells me everything I need to know about that vid.

I cant tell you what is "new" to you. I cant read your mind. Your resistance against education is typical of those with low education. Information wont harm you.

You know that I have heard all the standard bullshit lectures from the left on Race

You know that this video does nothing but rehash them.


But you don't want to admit that, because that would be telling the Truth.


And doing that, would violate your deal with Satan.

This is where your ignorance and resistance against education comes in. Its not a lecture. Its just facts.

Sure it is.

You'll never know being resistant to education. Not my fault you wish to remain ignorant and uneducated.

Says the man that had a chance to say what was new in this video, and instead played rhetoric games.


Because there is nothing new in the vid, and he knows it.

 

[Pogo]

And by a white guy to boot...



Before you post, especially to our white self-proclaimed conservatives on here, please have watched the video in it's entirety. And if there are any objections to his historical reference, please specify which one/s exactly.

Enjoy.

To be honest I did try to watch the whole video; I skimmed it. One, the narrator is annoying as hell in his "allow me to translate American history for "uneducated" people tone." Two, this is history that apparently thousands of viewers commented they'd never before heard of or learned. Three, the video--judging by the comment section beneath it--has encouraged many viewers to express hatred for America. Four, your OP is a trap crafted to catch and expose USMB racists with lighter skin tones; the video is the bait. Five, the OP, the video and the spirit of the thread are intellectually dishonest and disingenuous.

So one day, OP, you were surfing along minding your own business and just happened to discover a video on-the-line that just happened to contain epiphanic information thousands of its viewers had never learned either in K-12 public school or at university? Does this not smell like propaganda to you? And further, one must question the intent of the video's author. Did he compose and upload the video for educational purposes? Did he upload it for the purpose of uniting or dividing American citizens? Or, did he compose and upload the video for personal gain in the form of views, self-aggrandizement and subscriber dollars?

Your schtick is using media such as this video as self-convincing proof of an inferno of white racism which you want and apparently need to believe is burning down America. The act of people possessed of skin tones you have no way of identifying over the internet entering the thread and post angry or disagreeable comments only serves to further perpetuate your inner-narrative of living life as an oppressed martyr.

The problem here is a lack of understanding of Live and Let Live. Live and let live is not good enough for you. Live and prosper by your own effort and personal responsibility is a concept you are voluntarily deaf to, at least here online. Tell me, where in today's America do you see your people oppressed by our government, other than through the political ideology of Democratic Party Identity Politics? At the hands of law enforcement? What about Black law enforcement officers who apply our laws violently to Black civilians? Are they too Egyptian warrior-traitors keeping their people in chains?

You've allowed propaganda like this video to define you, instill hatred within you, and set you on an endless quest for vengeance against generations of fellow Americans who had nothing to with the great oppression out of history you refuse to let go of. Do you really fear a return to Jim Crow Laws? Are you really afraid of history repeating itself here in our America of today? Tell me, are you American first, or Black first?

Young, angry, full of hate and violent is in no way a beneficial goal toward which to inspire new generations. Do you really believe someone like yourself will raise an army from all of this hatred and lead it to some kind of successful vengeance against the so-called white man's government? If you are so courageous, why do you demand special protected status behind political race warfare traps and power words no one else can utter without persecution?

You want people to fear you, and then after they do, you want to accuse their fear as racism. You want people to hate you same as you hate them, and after they do, their hate (but never your hate) is racist. You want people to coexist in peace, and after they do, in your endless self-martyrizing unhappiness, you want to bring back around your reason for hating them, and not living in peace, originally. The passage of time is the growth of scar tissue; a process of healing historical wounds you refuse to allow to heal the rift and the wound between your people and other people. Why is that?

That's weird --- I actually read the length and breadth of the comment section ---- which takes considerably longer than watching the video you found it necessary to "skim" --- and I saw nothing "encourag(ing) many viewers to express hatred for America". But by all means quote us some.

It would seem you didn't watch the video at all, inasmuch as you're fixated on your own impressions of the present --- which is in no way what the video examined --- and completely whiffed on the historical lessons of the past, which IS its focus.

"Still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest", yadda yadda....

To be honest I did try to watch the whole video; I skimmed it. One, the narrator is annoying as hell in his "allow me to translate American history for "uneducated" people tone." Two, this is history that apparently thousands of viewers commented they'd never before heard of or learned. Three, the video--judging by the comment section beneath it--has encouraged many viewers to express hatred for America. Four, your OP is a trap crafted to catch and expose USMB racists with lighter skin tones; the video is the bait. Five, the OP, the video and the spirit of the thread are intellectually dishonest and disingenuous.

So one day, OP, you were surfing along minding your own business and just happened to discover a video on-the-line that just happened to contain epiphanic information thousands of its viewers had never learned either in K-12 public school or at university? Does this not smell like propaganda to you? And further, one must question the intent of the video's author. Did he compose and upload the video for educational purposes? Did he upload it for the purpose of uniting or dividing American citizens? Or, did he compose and upload the video for personal gain in the form of views, self-aggrandizement and subscriber dollars?

Your schtick is using media such as this video as self-convincing proof of an inferno of white racism which you want and apparently need to believe is burning down America. The act of people possessed of skin tones you have no way of identifying over the internet entering the thread and post angry or disagreeable comments only serves to further perpetuate your inner-narrative of living life as an oppressed martyr.

The problem here is a lack of understanding of Live and Let Live. Live and let live is not good enough for you. Live and prosper by your own effort and personal responsibility is a concept you are voluntarily deaf to, at least here online. Tell me, where in today's America do you see your people oppressed by our government, other than through the political ideology of Democratic Party Identity Politics? At the hands of law enforcement? What about Black law enforcement officers who apply our laws violently to Black civilians? Are they too Egyptian warrior-traitors keeping their people in chains?

You've allowed propaganda like this video to define you, instill hatred within you, and set you on an endless quest for vengeance against generations of fellow Americans who had nothing to with the great oppression out of history you refuse to let go of. Do you really fear a return to Jim Crow Laws? Are you really afraid of history repeating itself here in our America of today? Tell me, are you American first, or Black first?

Young, angry, full of hate and violent is in no way a beneficial goal toward which to inspire new generations. Do you really believe someone like yourself will raise an army from all of this hatred and lead it to some kind of successful vengeance against the so-called white man's government? If you are so courageous, why do you demand special protected status behind political race warfare traps and power words no one else can utter without persecution?

You want people to fear you, and then after they do, you want to accuse their fear as racism. You want people to hate you same as you hate them, and after they do, their hate (but never your hate) is racist. You want people to coexist in peace, and after they do, in your endless self-martyrizing unhappiness, you want to bring back around your reason for hating them, and not living in peace, originally. The passage of time is the growth of scar tissue; a process of healing historical wounds you refuse to allow to heal the rift and the wound between your people and other people. Why is that?

There's a lot to be addressed in your response, including the fact that you didn't watch the video in it's entirety, however, just these two observations are necessary.

1. You start off by saying "Live and Let Live", essentially agreeing to everything that was said in the video

but then you turn right around and jump, head-first, into

2. Calling it propaganda

You contradict yourself in your own response.

Makes no sense.

Note: This is me putting it in the nicest way possible.

Look, each of us views our individual selves as having a specific dominant identity, follow? Now this dominant identity could be predicated upon many different traits or associations. Such associations being skin color, ethnicity, religion, biological sex, membership in a social or political or military organization, and so forth. The next logical question then is: do we allow others to define our identity or do we define it ourselves, or is it defined at birth? The logical question after that is: do we allow ourselves to use our dominant identity to oppress or otherwise harm people who belong to different dominant identities, or, do we allow someone else to use our identities to make coexistence with other dominant identity groups nearly impossible?

My opinion has not changed after watching your video in its entirety. The video does not teach, rather, it feeds a specific hunger in young minds for hatred, and offers justification for anti-patriotic reaction. And this kind of self-serving snake-oil salesman ideology ticks me off personally, because at the end of a long day at work, there's no reason in hell why when I am smoking a Camel (ha, ha) on my back patio, any one of my many black neighbors and I should automatically assume the worst about each other on sight over our different skin tones. That kind of indoctrinated automaton reaction is bullshit class warfare repackaged as race warfare.

This video justifies the use of our individual dominant identities as ultimate "fall back" positions from which to justify the loathing of other, different peoples, our nation and any effort to bridge social and cultural gaps and divides. The author does not want to unite Americans. He does not want to educate Americans. He does seek to further divide us and perpetuate a narrative of hatred on both sides, for the other side.

And here agian, you don't discuss anything actually IN the video at all. All you post about here is your own emotional reactions TO it. Your emotions are not only not at all the point --- they're irrelevant. History really doesn't give a shit how we feel about it. Nor should it. Because that's when we start sanitizing and revising.

 

[Asclepias]

I cant tell you what is "new" to you. I cant read your mind. Your resistance against education is typical of those with low education. Information wont harm you.

You know that I have heard all the standard bullshit lectures from the left on Race

You know that this video does nothing but rehash them.


But you don't want to admit that, because that would be telling the Truth.


And doing that, would violate your deal with Satan.

This is where your ignorance and resistance against education comes in. Its not a lecture. Its just facts.

Sure it is.

You'll never know being resistant to education. Not my fault you wish to remain ignorant and uneducated.

Says the man that had a chance to say what was new in this video, and instead played rhetoric games.


Because there is nothing new in the vid, and he knows it.

I shouldnt have to tell you whats new in the video. You should be open to being educated. Like I said before I cant tell you how much of this is "new" for you. Could be very little but my bet is you need to watch the entire thing from beginning to end and then do some homework.

 

[Pogo]

The 2015 top 10 racist cities, according to hate crime rates.

10. St Paul
9. Las Vegas
8. Indianapolis
7. Kansas City
6. Phoenix
5. Los Angeles
4. New York City
3. Seattle
2. Boston
1. Columbus



They all have one thing in common. Las Vegas did vote in a Republican mayor in late 2015.

Should we even go into exactly how specious this post is?

Why not, I'm feeling generous.

1. You've got no link. Apparently we're just supposed to accept it "because you say so".

2. Having as we just said no link, you present no criteria whatsoever for how we are to define "racist city". None whatsoever.

3. You assert "they all have one thing in common" and then proceed to cite a factoid about ONE of them. Are we to assume they all voted in a Republilcan mayor in late 2015?

and 4. What the **** difference would it make if they did or didn't ? Are you trying to set up an Association Fallacy to follow Ipse Dixit AND shirking your Burden of Proof?

 

[MarathonMike]

Imagine that, you found one of the bazillion White Guiltists give us a treatise on 100 year old Southern Racism. Fascinating! But like all Racism claims by Blacks, institutional racism like Jim Crow has long been relegated to the dustbin of history. But yeah those Southern Democrats of the late 1800s, whoo boy they were some kind of Racists weren't they?

Why are you referring to this historian in such an insulting and derogatory manor? I asked in the OP to specify which part/s, if any, that you have problems with.

I'm calling it in, please do so.

Thanks.

What's wrong with White Guiltist? He is White Guy with Black oppression guilt. Too accurate for you?

 

[Pogo]

White Protestants:


View attachment 214832




Klansmen march down Broadway in Long Branch, N.J. to celebrate its newly-established headquarters in the city.

George Rinhart/Corbis— Getty Images

By Olivia B. Waxman

Updated: October 24, 2017 11:10 AM ET

In the months since violence at a white-nationalist gathering in Charlottesville, Va., the national conversation has often focused on the history of white supremacy in the United States, and how much broader that history is in its impacts and geography than is often assumed. That aspect is highlighted in a new book about the Ku Klux Klan in the 1920s, The Second Coming of the KKK by two-time Bancroft Prize winner Linda Gordon, which puts modern anti-immigration and antisemitic rhetoric in context. In fact, though the KKK is best known for its racist attacks, other forms of hate have long been part of its history.

It was in the 1920s that the Klan was revived, its popularity spread through the infamous 1915 film Birth of a Nation, and soon became a truly massive social movement in the North, with some five million members. The Klan as it exists today is a more direct offshoot of the iteration that emerged during that time period in North, often in locations with very small African-American populations. What those places did have was a surge of immigrants coming to the U.S. in the late 19th century and early 20th century. Soon, the racist rhetoric of the original KKK was joined by anti-immigrant rhetoric directed at Catholics (accused of worshiping a Pope who sought to impose authoritarian rule), non-white immigrants like the Chinese and Japanese, and European immigrants not considered white enough, i.e. Italians and Eastern European Jews.

How the KKK's Influence Spread in Northern States

Excellent and pertinent resource, thanks.

That undated picture from Long Branch is either the "picnic" the Klan held in the summer of 1924 or just before it. That picnic was the event that came to be called the "Klanbake", misattributed to the Democratic Party convention that year even though it was sixty miles away and wrapped up well before the convention did. That misattribution is a 20th century invention; there's no contemporary note of it in the time. And yet we had not one but two posters here post a picture of wet trolley tracks on a December day in Wisconsin from months later, trying to sell it as "the Democratic convention".

Pertinent info further down in the link mentions:

>> public-relations professionals Elizabeth Tyler and Edward Clarke of the Southern Publicity Association, who advised the Klan to focus on drawing out prejudices that they suspected were already latent in American society. As a result of that decision, the new 20th century KKK was actually bigger in the North than it was in the South.

“At its peak, the Klan numbered between 3 million and 5 million people in the North,” Gordon explains. They recruited openly, publishing newspapers and magazines, promoting traveling lecturers, and holding state-fair-like “Klonvocations,” where members and their families would gather in the KKK’s infamous white costumes. “It’s estimated that 40,000 ministers were members of the Klan,” Gordon adds, “and these people were sermonizing regularly, explicitly urging people to join the Klan.” <<​

Tyler and Clarke are worthy of further research -- they had a lot to do with the Klan spreading coast to coast, as described. Local Klanners used to show up at churches, in full regalia, with donations, obviously selling the Klan in the process. Joining the Klan required Protestant Christianism and that one was re-founded by an ex-Methodist minister.

The Klan of the 1920s 'enrolled more members in Connecticut than in Mississippi, more in Oregon than in Louisiana, and more in New Jersey than in Alabama,' wrote historian Stanley Coben.

Of course, when I note "Tyler and Clarke" (or anything) is worthy of further research, that assumes the reader is at all interested in researching rather than wrapping oneself in a cocoon making low moans of myth-repetition noises. Obviously that element walks among us, doesn't it.

Thanks for this link. I see that again some wackball has marked it "funny". Good to know there walk among us those who think history is some kind of comedy.

 

[MizMolly]

White Protestants:


View attachment 214832




Klansmen march down Broadway in Long Branch, N.J. to celebrate its newly-established headquarters in the city.

George Rinhart/Corbis— Getty Images

By Olivia B. Waxman

Updated: October 24, 2017 11:10 AM ET

In the months since violence at a white-nationalist gathering in Charlottesville, Va., the national conversation has often focused on the history of white supremacy in the United States, and how much broader that history is in its impacts and geography than is often assumed. That aspect is highlighted in a new book about the Ku Klux Klan in the 1920s, The Second Coming of the KKK by two-time Bancroft Prize winner Linda Gordon, which puts modern anti-immigration and antisemitic rhetoric in context. In fact, though the KKK is best known for its racist attacks, other forms of hate have long been part of its history.

It was in the 1920s that the Klan was revived, its popularity spread through the infamous 1915 film Birth of a Nation, and soon became a truly massive social movement in the North, with some five million members. The Klan as it exists today is a more direct offshoot of the iteration that emerged during that time period in North, often in locations with very small African-American populations. What those places did have was a surge of immigrants coming to the U.S. in the late 19th century and early 20th century. Soon, the racist rhetoric of the original KKK was joined by anti-immigrant rhetoric directed at Catholics (accused of worshiping a Pope who sought to impose authoritarian rule), non-white immigrants like the Chinese and Japanese, and European immigrants not considered white enough, i.e. Italians and Eastern European Jews.

How the KKK's Influence Spread in Northern States

Most whites are not involved with the KKK, it is a racist hate group. What was the point of the photos and this history? We all know about the KKK, they should be abolished.

 

[MizMolly]

And by a white guy to boot...



Before you post, especially to our white self-proclaimed conservatives on here, please have watched the video in it's entirety. And if there are any objections to his historical reference, please specify which one/s exactly.

Enjoy.

To be honest I did try to watch the whole video; I skimmed it. One, the narrator is annoying as hell in his "allow me to translate American history for "uneducated" people tone." Two, this is history that apparently thousands of viewers commented they'd never before heard of or learned. Three, the video--judging by the comment section beneath it--has encouraged many viewers to express hatred for America. Four, your OP is a trap crafted to catch and expose USMB racists with lighter skin tones; the video is the bait. Five, the OP, the video and the spirit of the thread are intellectually dishonest and disingenuous.

So one day, OP, you were surfing along minding your own business and just happened to discover a video on-the-line that just happened to contain epiphanic information thousands of its viewers had never learned either in K-12 public school or at university? Does this not smell like propaganda to you? And further, one must question the intent of the video's author. Did he compose and upload the video for educational purposes? Did he upload it for the purpose of uniting or dividing American citizens? Or, did he compose and upload the video for personal gain in the form of views, self-aggrandizement and subscriber dollars?

Your schtick is using media such as this video as self-convincing proof of an inferno of white racism which you want and apparently need to believe is burning down America. The act of people possessed of skin tones you have no way of identifying over the internet entering the thread and post angry or disagreeable comments only serves to further perpetuate your inner-narrative of living life as an oppressed martyr.

The problem here is a lack of understanding of Live and Let Live. Live and let live is not good enough for you. Live and prosper by your own effort and personal responsibility is a concept you are voluntarily deaf to, at least here online. Tell me, where in today's America do you see your people oppressed by our government, other than through the political ideology of Democratic Party Identity Politics? At the hands of law enforcement? What about Black law enforcement officers who apply our laws violently to Black civilians? Are they too Egyptian warrior-traitors keeping their people in chains?

You've allowed propaganda like this video to define you, instill hatred within you, and set you on an endless quest for vengeance against generations of fellow Americans who had nothing to with the great oppression out of history you refuse to let go of. Do you really fear a return to Jim Crow Laws? Are you really afraid of history repeating itself here in our America of today? Tell me, are you American first, or Black first?

Young, angry, full of hate and violent is in no way a beneficial goal toward which to inspire new generations. Do you really believe someone like yourself will raise an army from all of this hatred and lead it to some kind of successful vengeance against the so-called white man's government? If you are so courageous, why do you demand special protected status behind political race warfare traps and power words no one else can utter without persecution?

You want people to fear you, and then after they do, you want to accuse their fear as racism. You want people to hate you same as you hate them, and after they do, their hate (but never your hate) is racist. You want people to coexist in peace, and after they do, in your endless self-martyrizing unhappiness, you want to bring back around your reason for hating them, and not living in peace, originally. The passage of time is the growth of scar tissue; a process of healing historical wounds you refuse to allow to heal the rift and the wound between your people and other people. Why is that?

Live and let live huh? Why do whites want us to live and let live when whites cant do the same?

Sure we are.

 

[Correll]

You know that I have heard all the standard bullshit lectures from the left on Race

You know that this video does nothing but rehash them.


But you don't want to admit that, because that would be telling the Truth.


And doing that, would violate your deal with Satan.

This is where your ignorance and resistance against education comes in. Its not a lecture. Its just facts.

Sure it is.

You'll never know being resistant to education. Not my fault you wish to remain ignorant and uneducated.

Says the man that had a chance to say what was new in this video, and instead played rhetoric games.


Because there is nothing new in the vid, and he knows it.

I shouldnt have to tell you whats new in the video. You should be open to being educated. Like I said before I cant tell you how much of this is "new" for you. Could be very little but my bet is you need to watch the entire thing from beginning to end and then do some homework.

Says the man who still can't come up with ONE new thing in the video.

 

[Asclepias]

This is where your ignorance and resistance against education comes in. Its not a lecture. Its just facts.

Sure it is.

You'll never know being resistant to education. Not my fault you wish to remain ignorant and uneducated.

Says the man that had a chance to say what was new in this video, and instead played rhetoric games.


Because there is nothing new in the vid, and he knows it.

I shouldnt have to tell you whats new in the video. You should be open to being educated. Like I said before I cant tell you how much of this is "new" for you. Could be very little but my bet is you need to watch the entire thing from beginning to end and then do some homework.

Says the man who still can't come up with ONE new thing in the video.

Says the clown thats afraid of education.

 

[Pogo]

And by a white guy to boot...



Before you post, especially to our white self-proclaimed conservatives on here, please have watched the video in it's entirety. And if there are any objections to his historical reference, please specify which one/s exactly.

Enjoy.

Jim Crow is pretty established historical fact. What new does he have to say?

Depends on how educated you are about Jim Crow. You will only learn something new by watching it.

Exactly. I knew most of this stuff but I wasn't familiar with Truman's reaction to the Woodward incident, nor did I know the details about the 'grandfather' operation to keep poor and/or illiterate whites on the voting rolls. Those were a couple of little things. Apparently Correll would have us believe he knew all these details but it does help to explain why Strom Thurmond and southern Democrats walked out on their convention two years later after hearing too much about 'civil rights' from Truman and Humphrey. And context is always welcome; it helps tie the puzzle pieces together.

I will never understand the attitude of these wags who treat history like it's some kind of radioactive plutonium thing that one doesn't dare get near, or what the hell they're afraid of.

 

[Asclepias]

And by a white guy to boot...



Before you post, especially to our white self-proclaimed conservatives on here, please have watched the video in it's entirety. And if there are any objections to his historical reference, please specify which one/s exactly.

Enjoy.

To be honest I did try to watch the whole video; I skimmed it. One, the narrator is annoying as hell in his "allow me to translate American history for "uneducated" people tone." Two, this is history that apparently thousands of viewers commented they'd never before heard of or learned. Three, the video--judging by the comment section beneath it--has encouraged many viewers to express hatred for America. Four, your OP is a trap crafted to catch and expose USMB racists with lighter skin tones; the video is the bait. Five, the OP, the video and the spirit of the thread are intellectually dishonest and disingenuous.

So one day, OP, you were surfing along minding your own business and just happened to discover a video on-the-line that just happened to contain epiphanic information thousands of its viewers had never learned either in K-12 public school or at university? Does this not smell like propaganda to you? And further, one must question the intent of the video's author. Did he compose and upload the video for educational purposes? Did he upload it for the purpose of uniting or dividing American citizens? Or, did he compose and upload the video for personal gain in the form of views, self-aggrandizement and subscriber dollars?

Your schtick is using media such as this video as self-convincing proof of an inferno of white racism which you want and apparently need to believe is burning down America. The act of people possessed of skin tones you have no way of identifying over the internet entering the thread and post angry or disagreeable comments only serves to further perpetuate your inner-narrative of living life as an oppressed martyr.

The problem here is a lack of understanding of Live and Let Live. Live and let live is not good enough for you. Live and prosper by your own effort and personal responsibility is a concept you are voluntarily deaf to, at least here online. Tell me, where in today's America do you see your people oppressed by our government, other than through the political ideology of Democratic Party Identity Politics? At the hands of law enforcement? What about Black law enforcement officers who apply our laws violently to Black civilians? Are they too Egyptian warrior-traitors keeping their people in chains?

You've allowed propaganda like this video to define you, instill hatred within you, and set you on an endless quest for vengeance against generations of fellow Americans who had nothing to with the great oppression out of history you refuse to let go of. Do you really fear a return to Jim Crow Laws? Are you really afraid of history repeating itself here in our America of today? Tell me, are you American first, or Black first?

Young, angry, full of hate and violent is in no way a beneficial goal toward which to inspire new generations. Do you really believe someone like yourself will raise an army from all of this hatred and lead it to some kind of successful vengeance against the so-called white man's government? If you are so courageous, why do you demand special protected status behind political race warfare traps and power words no one else can utter without persecution?

You want people to fear you, and then after they do, you want to accuse their fear as racism. You want people to hate you same as you hate them, and after they do, their hate (but never your hate) is racist. You want people to coexist in peace, and after they do, in your endless self-martyrizing unhappiness, you want to bring back around your reason for hating them, and not living in peace, originally. The passage of time is the growth of scar tissue; a process of healing historical wounds you refuse to allow to heal the rift and the wound between your people and other people. Why is that?

Live and let live huh? Why do whites want us to live and let live when whites cant do the same?

Sure we are.

Sure we are what?

 

[Asclepias]

And by a white guy to boot...



Before you post, especially to our white self-proclaimed conservatives on here, please have watched the video in it's entirety. And if there are any objections to his historical reference, please specify which one/s exactly.

Enjoy.

Jim Crow is pretty established historical fact. What new does he have to say?

Depends on how educated you are about Jim Crow. You will only learn something new by watching it.

Exactly. I knew most of this stuff but I wasn't familiar with Truman's reaction to the Woodward incident, nor did I know the details about the 'grandfather' operation to keep poor and/or illiterate whites on the voting rolls. Those were a couple of little things. Apparently Correll would have us believe he knew all these details but it does help to explain why Strom Thurmond and southern Democrats walked out on their convention two years later after hearing too much about 'civil rights' from Truman and Humphrey. And context is always welcome; it helps tie the puzzle pieces together.

I will never understand the attitude of these wags who treat history like it's some kind of radioactive plutonium thing that one doesn't dare get near, or what the hell they're afraid of.

They are content with their ignorance and learning new things makes them uncomfortable.

 

[Pogo]

View attachment 214847 View attachment 214848

"PragerU" -- which is a mythmaking propaganda site and not a "U" at all, whose propaganda is easily debunked? Don't think so klown. No, you're not going to make a point by trolling around gong "LOOK ME FIND GOOGLY IMAGE", doesn't work that way, never did, never will.

Here's your debunkment in an actual article, with links and resources. Sorry it's what we call "reality" as opposed to graphic bullshit which I guess must be fun but serves nothing. Go ahead and try to refute it.

Besides which, even if your Googly Image contained legitimate points, they would have no aim other than yet another lame Association Fallacy.

You do understand what Association Fallacy is, do you not?

 

[Correll]

Sure it is.

You'll never know being resistant to education. Not my fault you wish to remain ignorant and uneducated.

Says the man that had a chance to say what was new in this video, and instead played rhetoric games.


Because there is nothing new in the vid, and he knows it.

I shouldnt have to tell you whats new in the video. You should be open to being educated. Like I said before I cant tell you how much of this is "new" for you. Could be very little but my bet is you need to watch the entire thing from beginning to end and then do some homework.

Says the man who still can't come up with ONE new thing in the video.

Says the clown thats afraid of education.

Hearing the same old shit, over and over again, is not education.

 

[MizMolly]

And by a white guy to boot...



Before you post, especially to our white self-proclaimed conservatives on here, please have watched the video in it's entirety. And if there are any objections to his historical reference, please specify which one/s exactly.

Enjoy.

To be honest I did try to watch the whole video; I skimmed it. One, the narrator is annoying as hell in his "allow me to translate American history for "uneducated" people tone." Two, this is history that apparently thousands of viewers commented they'd never before heard of or learned. Three, the video--judging by the comment section beneath it--has encouraged many viewers to express hatred for America. Four, your OP is a trap crafted to catch and expose USMB racists with lighter skin tones; the video is the bait. Five, the OP, the video and the spirit of the thread are intellectually dishonest and disingenuous.

So one day, OP, you were surfing along minding your own business and just happened to discover a video on-the-line that just happened to contain epiphanic information thousands of its viewers had never learned either in K-12 public school or at university? Does this not smell like propaganda to you? And further, one must question the intent of the video's author. Did he compose and upload the video for educational purposes? Did he upload it for the purpose of uniting or dividing American citizens? Or, did he compose and upload the video for personal gain in the form of views, self-aggrandizement and subscriber dollars?

Your schtick is using media such as this video as self-convincing proof of an inferno of white racism which you want and apparently need to believe is burning down America. The act of people possessed of skin tones you have no way of identifying over the internet entering the thread and post angry or disagreeable comments only serves to further perpetuate your inner-narrative of living life as an oppressed martyr.

The problem here is a lack of understanding of Live and Let Live. Live and let live is not good enough for you. Live and prosper by your own effort and personal responsibility is a concept you are voluntarily deaf to, at least here online. Tell me, where in today's America do you see your people oppressed by our government, other than through the political ideology of Democratic Party Identity Politics? At the hands of law enforcement? What about Black law enforcement officers who apply our laws violently to Black civilians? Are they too Egyptian warrior-traitors keeping their people in chains?

You've allowed propaganda like this video to define you, instill hatred within you, and set you on an endless quest for vengeance against generations of fellow Americans who had nothing to with the great oppression out of history you refuse to let go of. Do you really fear a return to Jim Crow Laws? Are you really afraid of history repeating itself here in our America of today? Tell me, are you American first, or Black first?

Young, angry, full of hate and violent is in no way a beneficial goal toward which to inspire new generations. Do you really believe someone like yourself will raise an army from all of this hatred and lead it to some kind of successful vengeance against the so-called white man's government? If you are so courageous, why do you demand special protected status behind political race warfare traps and power words no one else can utter without persecution?

You want people to fear you, and then after they do, you want to accuse their fear as racism. You want people to hate you same as you hate them, and after they do, their hate (but never your hate) is racist. You want people to coexist in peace, and after they do, in your endless self-martyrizing unhappiness, you want to bring back around your reason for hating them, and not living in peace, originally. The passage of time is the growth of scar tissue; a process of healing historical wounds you refuse to allow to heal the rift and the wound between your people and other people. Why is that?

Live and let live huh? Why do whites want us to live and let live when whites cant do the same?

Sure we are.

Sure we are what?

Living and let live

 

[Pogo]

You have answered it. He says nothing new. Just more moronic lefties lecturing white Americans on hold bad they are.

I didnt answer it. I said you wont hear anything new if you are too under educated to listen to it.

Your refusal to specific anything "new" he might have said, tells me that he says nothing new.

That you like it, tells me what the gist of it is.

That was your answer.


And it tells me everything I need to know about that vid.

I cant tell you what is "new" to you. I cant read your mind. Your resistance against education is typical of those with low education. Information wont harm you.

You know that I have heard all the standard bullshit lectures from the left on Race

You know that this video does nothing but rehash them.


But you don't want to admit that, because that would be telling the Truth.


And doing that, would violate your deal with Satan.

This is where your ignorance and resistance against education comes in. Its not a lecture. Its just facts.

Facts sure do scare the bejesus out of them. As if it's I dunno toxic or something.

Nobody makes a counterargument by going They don't seem to realize that.