America....The Present and The Future

If these dolts want to know where the jobs went just look East and thank the LAST TWO presidents BEFORE the black guy took office.
But the black dude did nothing to fix the problem. Does he deserve any blame?

What did HE do to make it worse? Does he deserve any blame? He has been the most powerless president since Carter. I'm not sure what he could have done. The republican leadership made it clear they intended to sabotage his presidency and they did. Many indicators are up including the DOW. Could he have done some things better? Sure. Stayed the hell out of Libya and Syria. It was Bush's mess ..he should have just washed his hands clean of it and let the chips fall where they would in the Mid East. At home he had little say on spending. In his first term he did get his Affordable Health Care Bill passed...sort of. A lot of people are complaining about it. Personally I am happy with my health care now. I can't complain.

All in all Obama's two terms have been a disappointment. Has he screwed the pooch? Not really as far as I can tell. Would the war hero/POW or the morman bishop have done any better? I doubt it. The ship was on the rocks when Obama took office. Many here conveniently forget that. Piss on them.

Obviously this country wasn't ready for a black POTUS. I would be more inclined to say THAT and not WHO happened to be the first black prez is what failed.
delusional, but typical dupe post.

He had both houses of congress and instead of cleaning up wall street and curtailing the cronyism that caused the crash, he chose to push a terrible failure that is obamacare.

race has nothing to do with it...dupe.

You are the delusional one. I will go ahead and say it. You are a bold faced liar. If you think Obama ruined the economy you are ready for the loony bin. The hate runs deep. It's obvious where it comes from. I just don't like Obama. There are no valid reasons to hate him. That only leaves racism. The extreme vitriol you people exhibit toward Obama and the office he occupies far exceeds any possible actions he has taken that I am aware of. Yet you give Bush a pass for lying our country into an unnecessary war or two and actually destroying the US and the Worlds economies. Crazy much? I don't believe you are kidding anyone about your motives.
You might want to go back to grade school. I never stated he ruined the economy.

I do not hate anyone, but I do hate liberalism, elitism, and tyranny....all three have much in common.

W was without question one of our worst presidents...I have stated this many times on this forum, but apparently you missed it. BO is also one of our worst. There is little difference between the two. Yet, you hate W and love BO. Makes no sense, but then liberals seldom do.

Fuck you. Read MY LIPS! I didn't vote for Obama. I've NEVER voted for a dem. I USED to vote only GOP..both times for the idiot Bush AND his senile father. Since the fascist Christian Fundamentalists took over MY party it has become over run by thieves and sky fairy believing idiots. I'm an atheist. It is YOU that places party over patriotism. Fuck off nitwit.
 
Did-You-Know-1-Out-Of-Hillary-Supported-Are-Just-As-Stupid-As-The-Other-2-Funny-Hillary-Clinton-Meme-Image.jpg

poor skanky... :cuckoo:
 
You have no clue how our Constitution functions

That is the kind of response I would expect from a child defeated in a debate. Only one of us has even read the U.S. Constitution - and it sure as hell isn't you. Only one of us has studied it throughly. Only one of us has extensively studied the original writings of our founders. Only one of us has read The Federalist Papers. Only one of us has backed up our comments with quotes (including dates), sections of the U.S. Constitution, links, etc.

If this were academia, you would have been kicked out for lack of sources (not to mention misinformation). You're out of your league here RW. You don't know the Constitution. I do. I'm sorry that it prevents you from the radical socialism you desire, but it does. You have two choices - move to Cuba and enjoy your ideological utopia first hand or convince the American people to amend the U.S. Constitution. I would recommend Cuba. It will be exponentially easier for you.

If this were academia, you would be placed with all the other Constitutional crackpots who treat the document like a fundamentalist treats the bible

If you know the Constitution as well as you claim, you would be aware that the court system established by that document does not support your point of view
 
1. In a constellation of lies from an administration based on lies, this one may be the most egregious....

"OBAMA: Anyone claiming that America's economy is in decline is peddling fiction.” Obama: Anyone Claiming America's Economy Is In Decline Is Peddling Fiction


OMG!!!!



2.While I can certainly provide dozens and dozens of examples that prove the absurdity of this absurd executive's self-serving fairy tales, this is one of the most recent:

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. economy created the fewest number of jobs in more than five years in May as employment in the manufacturing and construction sectors fell sharply, suggesting a deterioration in the labor market ...Nonfarm payrolls increased by only 38,000 jobs last month, the smallest gain since September 2010, the Labor Department said on Friday. Underscoring the report's weakness, employers hired 59,000 fewer workers in March and April than previously reported. While the unemployment rate fell three-tenths of a percentage point to 4.7 percent in May, the lowest since November 2007, that was in part due to people dropping out of the labor force."
Weak U.S. employment report dims prospect of Fed rate hike




3. "The somber assessment of the current jobs market, offered Monday by the chairman of the Federal Reserve, Janet Yellen, certainly throws cold water on President Obama’s election-year messaging.

4. GDP Growth under Mr. Obama has averaged a stagnant 1.7% a year.Meanwhile, Ireland is growing at nearly 8%, India at 7%, Sweden at 4%. The Obama economy is a loser compared with other countries.

[An interesting comparison,..... FDR's 'economic recovery' from the Depression trailed that of those nations that weren't led by Roosevelt.]

5. ...[Obama's is] “the worst economic-growth record of any president” since the Great Depression, says Stanford economist Michael Boskin.



6. Growth dipped below 1% in the first quarter, and full time employment actually shrank in May.

7. We can’t let Obama-stagnation become the new normal. It’s driving Americans to self-destruction. Deaths from alcoholism, drug addiction, cirrhosis of the liver, and suicides — what Princeton University researcher Anne Case calls “deaths of despair” — have soared.




8. Who’s equipped to jumpstart America’s economy, .....
Spoiler alert, it’s not Mrs. Clinton. She makes her money giving speeches and promoting books about herself.



9. [Bill's wife] calls her plan “fair growth.” The phrase should strike terror into the heart of any business owner. It means more gender and racial preferences in hiring, more government rules on how employees are paid, and tax hikes to push businesses into what she calls “farsighted investments.” Uncle Sam will be sitting in boardrooms and looking over managers’ shoulders."
As Obama Economy Falters Feds Could Yet Force Pols To Bare Their Tax Returns - The New York Sun





Look around....and remember those who put this man, and this party, in office.

And remember the contempt that they deserve.
dNsme6eT.gif
 
What did HE do to make it worse? Does he deserve any blame? He has been the most powerless president since Carter. I'm not sure what he could have done. The republican leadership made it clear they intended to sabotage his presidency and they did. Many indicators are up including the DOW. Could he have done some things better? Sure. Stayed the hell out of Libya and Syria. It was Bush's mess ..he should have just washed his hands clean of it and let the chips fall where they would in the Mid East. At home he had little say on spending. In his first term he did get his Affordable Health Care Bill passed...sort of. A lot of people are complaining about it. Personally I am happy with my health care now. I can't complain.

All in all Obama's two terms have been a disappointment. Has he screwed the pooch? Not really as far as I can tell. Would the war hero/POW or the morman bishop have done any better? I doubt it. The ship was on the rocks when Obama took office. Many here conveniently forget that. Piss on them.

Obviously this country wasn't ready for a black POTUS. I would be more inclined to say THAT and not WHO happened to be the first black prez is what failed.
delusional, but typical dupe post.

He had both houses of congress and instead of cleaning up wall street and curtailing the cronyism that caused the crash, he chose to push a terrible failure that is obamacare.

race has nothing to do with it...dupe.
Obama passed financial reform legislation at the same time Obamacare was passed

Of course, all Republicans voted against it

Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And it did nothing to reform Wall Street....dupe.

The president isn't responsible to cure all ills in the US. What did congress do to reform the thieves and traitors at the Banks and Wall street? Nada...NOTHING!! I suppose THAT was all Obama's doing... Right!
You will never get it, will you.

Congress and the POTUS are all corrupt criminals. Do you really think this group of elitists, who get huge donations from Wall Street and the banksters, will do anything to curtail crony capitalism?

Are leftists aware of the following and does it matter?

Hillary Clinton is obviously on the take. Nobody gets $675,000 from Goldman Sachs for three speeches because of the content of the speeches. Nobody who is as charisma-challenged as Hillary Clinton gets as much as $2,500.

She and Bill have pulled in $153 million in speaking fees. "It's just one of those things . . . just one of those crazy things."

You are as dumb as a bag of hammers. I am not a democrat. I have NEVER voted for a democrat. If I were you I would put a bullet through that worthless brain of yours. You are a waste of oxygen. Congress is chock full of liars and thieves disguised as "good Christians". Your robotic posts and accusations prove you are no different than they. Do try to get a grip on reality. Your constant lying isn't nearly as entertaining as you might think.
 
delusional, but typical dupe post.

He had both houses of congress and instead of cleaning up wall street and curtailing the cronyism that caused the crash, he chose to push a terrible failure that is obamacare.

race has nothing to do with it...dupe.
Obama passed financial reform legislation at the same time Obamacare was passed

Of course, all Republicans voted against it
Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And it did nothing to reform Wall Street....dupe.

The president isn't responsible to cure all ills in the US. What did congress do to reform the thieves and traitors at the Banks and Wall street? Nada...NOTHING!! I suppose THAT was all Obama's doing... Right!
You will never get it, will you.

Congress and the POTUS are all corrupt criminals. Do you really think this group of elitists, who get huge donations from Wall Street and the banksters, will do anything to curtail crony capitalism?

Are leftists aware of the following and does it matter?

Hillary Clinton is obviously on the take. Nobody gets $675,000 from Goldman Sachs for three speeches because of the content of the speeches. Nobody who is as charisma-challenged as Hillary Clinton gets as much as $2,500.

She and Bill have pulled in $153 million in speaking fees. "It's just one of those things . . . just one of those crazy things."

You are as dumb as a bag of hammers. I am not a democrat. I have NEVER voted for a democrat. If I were you I would put a bullet through that worthless brain of yours. You are a waste of oxygen. Congress is chock full of liars and thieves disguised as "good Christians". Your robotic posts and accusations prove you are no different than they. Do try to get a grip on reality. Your constant lying isn't nearly as entertaining as you might think.
Damn...where did I claim you were democrat? Are you really this dumb or are you just playing a game?

Thank you for your kind words.

Why must you always resort to violence? Are you a commie? Those hateful words are not nice you know?
 
But the black dude did nothing to fix the problem. Does he deserve any blame?

What did HE do to make it worse? Does he deserve any blame? He has been the most powerless president since Carter. I'm not sure what he could have done. The republican leadership made it clear they intended to sabotage his presidency and they did. Many indicators are up including the DOW. Could he have done some things better? Sure. Stayed the hell out of Libya and Syria. It was Bush's mess ..he should have just washed his hands clean of it and let the chips fall where they would in the Mid East. At home he had little say on spending. In his first term he did get his Affordable Health Care Bill passed...sort of. A lot of people are complaining about it. Personally I am happy with my health care now. I can't complain.

All in all Obama's two terms have been a disappointment. Has he screwed the pooch? Not really as far as I can tell. Would the war hero/POW or the morman bishop have done any better? I doubt it. The ship was on the rocks when Obama took office. Many here conveniently forget that. Piss on them.

Obviously this country wasn't ready for a black POTUS. I would be more inclined to say THAT and not WHO happened to be the first black prez is what failed.
delusional, but typical dupe post.

He had both houses of congress and instead of cleaning up wall street and curtailing the cronyism that caused the crash, he chose to push a terrible failure that is obamacare.

race has nothing to do with it...dupe.
Obama passed financial reform legislation at the same time Obamacare was passed

Of course, all Republicans voted against it

Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't particularly like Obama but the thinly veiled racism these people exhibit show how backward our country still is in many respects. If there is anything that truly gets my goat it is blatant stupidity and willful ignorance. Their questioning MY character is laughable. They are some of the most unprincipled SOBs in existance.
Yeah it must be racism, because BO has done such a wonderful job. There can be no other explanation.

Can't fix stupid.
partisan rw stupid? In your case, no.
 
How does it feel to have you false narrative exposed in front of the world? :eusa_dance:

Show me a single judicial decision that supports your position

Internet Libertarians do not count
Again....that's like saying show me a single case of polio when describing the crisis with cancer. :eusa_doh:

We're talking about the U.S. Constitution junior. The fact that you have to keep changing the subject to courts and justices (appointed for their agenda) because the U.S. Constitution proves you are wrong says it all.

You have no clue how our Constitution functions

You look at it as a Cookbook with all the recipes and ingredients future generations are allowed to cook

In fact, our Constitution built a Kitchen comprised of three branches of Government. Future generations are allowed to use that kitchen to provide the meals they need

As a matter of fact - it is a cookbook with all of the recipes that future generations are permitted to cook. If they want to cook anything else, they must legally alter the "cookbook" (that is an analogy for legally amending the U.S. Constitution junior).

Once again illustrating your egregious lack of understanding about the U.S. Constitution. It is really sad how you believe that the U.S. Constitution breaks down government into three branches (because you've never read the Constitution and that's all you've picked up here on USMB). Astounding display of ignorance. That is merely the horizontal separation of powers at the federal level. But our founders designed a vertical separation of powers first and foremost. As the 10th Amendment clearly states - anything outside of the 18 enumerated powers specifically delegated by the states to the federal government are reserved to the states themselves or the people.

Seriously RW - you are the gift that keeps on giving. Every time you post you illustrate how much the left doesn't know what they are talking about. I would wince every time you posted if I were a liberal. Fortunately for me, I'm a constitutional conservative so I smile every time you post because you are showing everyone what not to be. An uninformed libtard who supports unconstitutional government and illegal activity.

You obviously have not read the document you claim to hold so dear

"We the People" constituted a government to represent us. That "Constitution" primarily establishes the branches of Government to do the will of "We the People"
You take three words out of the entire document and you attempt to apply it nonsensically. If you would get an adult to help you read beyond the first three words you would realize that it ends with "do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America". The preamble was simply stating "we are creating this document". Nothing more. Would you like to try again RW?
 
Show me a single judicial decision that supports your position

Internet Libertarians do not count
Again....that's like saying show me a single case of polio when describing the crisis with cancer. :eusa_doh:

We're talking about the U.S. Constitution junior. The fact that you have to keep changing the subject to courts and justices (appointed for their agenda) because the U.S. Constitution proves you are wrong says it all.

You have no clue how our Constitution functions

You look at it as a Cookbook with all the recipes and ingredients future generations are allowed to cook

In fact, our Constitution built a Kitchen comprised of three branches of Government. Future generations are allowed to use that kitchen to provide the meals they need

As a matter of fact - it is a cookbook with all of the recipes that future generations are permitted to cook. If they want to cook anything else, they must legally alter the "cookbook" (that is an analogy for legally amending the U.S. Constitution junior).

Once again illustrating your egregious lack of understanding about the U.S. Constitution. It is really sad how you believe that the U.S. Constitution breaks down government into three branches (because you've never read the Constitution and that's all you've picked up here on USMB). Astounding display of ignorance. That is merely the horizontal separation of powers at the federal level. But our founders designed a vertical separation of powers first and foremost. As the 10th Amendment clearly states - anything outside of the 18 enumerated powers specifically delegated by the states to the federal government are reserved to the states themselves or the people.

Seriously RW - you are the gift that keeps on giving. Every time you post you illustrate how much the left doesn't know what they are talking about. I would wince every time you posted if I were a liberal. Fortunately for me, I'm a constitutional conservative so I smile every time you post because you are showing everyone what not to be. An uninformed libtard who supports unconstitutional government and illegal activity.

You obviously have not read the document you claim to hold so dear

"We the People" constituted a government to represent us. That "Constitution" primarily establishes the branches of Government to do the will of "We the People"
You take three words out of the entire document and you attempt to apply it nonsensically. If you would get an adult to help you read beyond the first three words you would realize that it ends with "do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America". The preamble was simply stating "we are creating this document". Nothing more. Would you like to try again RW?

You missed the point of the whole document

We the People constituted a government
That government serves We the People...not a piece of paper
 
Again....that's like saying show me a single case of polio when describing the crisis with cancer. :eusa_doh:

We're talking about the U.S. Constitution junior. The fact that you have to keep changing the subject to courts and justices (appointed for their agenda) because the U.S. Constitution proves you are wrong says it all.

You have no clue how our Constitution functions

You look at it as a Cookbook with all the recipes and ingredients future generations are allowed to cook

In fact, our Constitution built a Kitchen comprised of three branches of Government. Future generations are allowed to use that kitchen to provide the meals they need

As a matter of fact - it is a cookbook with all of the recipes that future generations are permitted to cook. If they want to cook anything else, they must legally alter the "cookbook" (that is an analogy for legally amending the U.S. Constitution junior).

Once again illustrating your egregious lack of understanding about the U.S. Constitution. It is really sad how you believe that the U.S. Constitution breaks down government into three branches (because you've never read the Constitution and that's all you've picked up here on USMB). Astounding display of ignorance. That is merely the horizontal separation of powers at the federal level. But our founders designed a vertical separation of powers first and foremost. As the 10th Amendment clearly states - anything outside of the 18 enumerated powers specifically delegated by the states to the federal government are reserved to the states themselves or the people.

Seriously RW - you are the gift that keeps on giving. Every time you post you illustrate how much the left doesn't know what they are talking about. I would wince every time you posted if I were a liberal. Fortunately for me, I'm a constitutional conservative so I smile every time you post because you are showing everyone what not to be. An uninformed libtard who supports unconstitutional government and illegal activity.

You obviously have not read the document you claim to hold so dear

"We the People" constituted a government to represent us. That "Constitution" primarily establishes the branches of Government to do the will of "We the People"
You take three words out of the entire document and you attempt to apply it nonsensically. If you would get an adult to help you read beyond the first three words you would realize that it ends with "do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America". The preamble was simply stating "we are creating this document". Nothing more. Would you like to try again RW?

You missed the point of the whole document

We the People constituted a government
That government serves We the People...not a piece of paper



"in America, the law is King. For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other."
Common Sense, Thomas Paine.



Clearly, Thomas Paine had a very different understanding of that "piece of paper" then you do.

You probably don't know that the United States Constitution is correctly known as 'the law of the land.'

 
Again....that's like saying show me a single case of polio when describing the crisis with cancer. :eusa_doh:

We're talking about the U.S. Constitution junior. The fact that you have to keep changing the subject to courts and justices (appointed for their agenda) because the U.S. Constitution proves you are wrong says it all.

You have no clue how our Constitution functions

You look at it as a Cookbook with all the recipes and ingredients future generations are allowed to cook

In fact, our Constitution built a Kitchen comprised of three branches of Government. Future generations are allowed to use that kitchen to provide the meals they need

As a matter of fact - it is a cookbook with all of the recipes that future generations are permitted to cook. If they want to cook anything else, they must legally alter the "cookbook" (that is an analogy for legally amending the U.S. Constitution junior).

Once again illustrating your egregious lack of understanding about the U.S. Constitution. It is really sad how you believe that the U.S. Constitution breaks down government into three branches (because you've never read the Constitution and that's all you've picked up here on USMB). Astounding display of ignorance. That is merely the horizontal separation of powers at the federal level. But our founders designed a vertical separation of powers first and foremost. As the 10th Amendment clearly states - anything outside of the 18 enumerated powers specifically delegated by the states to the federal government are reserved to the states themselves or the people.

Seriously RW - you are the gift that keeps on giving. Every time you post you illustrate how much the left doesn't know what they are talking about. I would wince every time you posted if I were a liberal. Fortunately for me, I'm a constitutional conservative so I smile every time you post because you are showing everyone what not to be. An uninformed libtard who supports unconstitutional government and illegal activity.

You obviously have not read the document you claim to hold so dear

"We the People" constituted a government to represent us. That "Constitution" primarily establishes the branches of Government to do the will of "We the People"
You take three words out of the entire document and you attempt to apply it nonsensically. If you would get an adult to help you read beyond the first three words you would realize that it ends with "do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America". The preamble was simply stating "we are creating this document". Nothing more. Would you like to try again RW?

You missed the point of the whole document

We the People constituted a government
That government serves We the People...not a piece of paper
Nooooo....you missed the point of the document (as usual). We the people created the document specifically to limit the power of the people that would sit in office. You do not get to simply say "hey, I'm one of 'we the people' and therefore I have unlimited power to do whatever the fuck I want". That is your asinine position and it is absurd. The article of confederation - and later the U.S. Constitution - were specifically designed to outline the form and function of our government, including their limitation of powers.

If you want something beyond their current 18 enumerated powers (and you desperately do for some reason) then the onus is on you to get the U.S. Constitution amended. If you can't get the votes for that (and I suspect you can't for 99% of the nonsense you want), then you need to accept that "we the people have spoken" and we unilaterally reject your desire to mooch off of the rest of us.

It doesn't matter if 90% of all American's desire the federal government to do something. If you don't legally amend it - then it is illegal for them to do it. It really is that simple. We have rules and laws. For some reason, the left is too lazy to adhere to our rules and laws.
 
You have no clue how our Constitution functions

You look at it as a Cookbook with all the recipes and ingredients future generations are allowed to cook

In fact, our Constitution built a Kitchen comprised of three branches of Government. Future generations are allowed to use that kitchen to provide the meals they need

As a matter of fact - it is a cookbook with all of the recipes that future generations are permitted to cook. If they want to cook anything else, they must legally alter the "cookbook" (that is an analogy for legally amending the U.S. Constitution junior).

Once again illustrating your egregious lack of understanding about the U.S. Constitution. It is really sad how you believe that the U.S. Constitution breaks down government into three branches (because you've never read the Constitution and that's all you've picked up here on USMB). Astounding display of ignorance. That is merely the horizontal separation of powers at the federal level. But our founders designed a vertical separation of powers first and foremost. As the 10th Amendment clearly states - anything outside of the 18 enumerated powers specifically delegated by the states to the federal government are reserved to the states themselves or the people.

Seriously RW - you are the gift that keeps on giving. Every time you post you illustrate how much the left doesn't know what they are talking about. I would wince every time you posted if I were a liberal. Fortunately for me, I'm a constitutional conservative so I smile every time you post because you are showing everyone what not to be. An uninformed libtard who supports unconstitutional government and illegal activity.

You obviously have not read the document you claim to hold so dear

"We the People" constituted a government to represent us. That "Constitution" primarily establishes the branches of Government to do the will of "We the People"
You take three words out of the entire document and you attempt to apply it nonsensically. If you would get an adult to help you read beyond the first three words you would realize that it ends with "do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America". The preamble was simply stating "we are creating this document". Nothing more. Would you like to try again RW?

You missed the point of the whole document

We the People constituted a government
That government serves We the People...not a piece of paper



"in America, the law is King. For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other."
Common Sense, Thomas Paine.

Clearly, Thomas Paine had a very different understanding of that "piece of paper" then you do.

You probably don't know that the United States Constitution is correctly known as 'the law of the land.'

You want a good laugh PC? Three years ago, idiot libtard Swallow actually argued with me that the U.S. Constitution was not law. He claimed it was just a document to outline the structure of government and had nothing to do with the law. Yes....I'm not kidding. Here it is - enjoy: If you want to know what is wrong with America - click on this thread
 
President Obama was, is, and always will be the superior choice to both of his opponents for President. Much like HRC is the clear superior choice to Drumpf.


Barack Obama has turned out to be the abject failure that we on the other side predicted he would be.

I just proved it.....as indicated by the fact that you didn't deny anything in the OP....

....most especially this:
I can certainly provide dozens and dozens of examples that prove the absurdity of this absurd executive's self-serving fairy tales, this is one of the most recent:

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. economy created the fewest number of jobs in more than five years in May as employment in the manufacturing and construction sectors fell sharply, suggesting a deterioration in the labor market ...Nonfarm payrolls increased by only 38,000 jobs last month, the smallest gain since September 2010, the Labor Department said on Friday. Underscoring the report's weakness, employers hired 59,000 fewer workers in March and April than previously reported. While the unemployment rate fell three-tenths of a percentage point to 4.7 percent in May, the lowest since November 2007, that was in part due to people dropping out of the labor force."
Weak U.S. employment report dims prospect of Fed rate hike


But...I fully recognize the reason for your continued support of this political miscarriage.....you recognize the same character flaws in yourself.
One need simply look at your choice of avi.
LOL Silly, silly PC, if at the end of President Obama's second term we are losing 500,000 jobs, and the market is headed straight down.you can make those claims. Otherwise, considering what the GOP left him on 20Jan09, I would say that he has done an excellent job. 4.7% unemployment, market at about 18,000. And all of this in spite of the efforts of the GOP to destroy the economy. And now it looks like the GOP has destroyed itself.
 
You have no clue how our Constitution functions

You look at it as a Cookbook with all the recipes and ingredients future generations are allowed to cook

In fact, our Constitution built a Kitchen comprised of three branches of Government. Future generations are allowed to use that kitchen to provide the meals they need

As a matter of fact - it is a cookbook with all of the recipes that future generations are permitted to cook. If they want to cook anything else, they must legally alter the "cookbook" (that is an analogy for legally amending the U.S. Constitution junior).

Once again illustrating your egregious lack of understanding about the U.S. Constitution. It is really sad how you believe that the U.S. Constitution breaks down government into three branches (because you've never read the Constitution and that's all you've picked up here on USMB). Astounding display of ignorance. That is merely the horizontal separation of powers at the federal level. But our founders designed a vertical separation of powers first and foremost. As the 10th Amendment clearly states - anything outside of the 18 enumerated powers specifically delegated by the states to the federal government are reserved to the states themselves or the people.

Seriously RW - you are the gift that keeps on giving. Every time you post you illustrate how much the left doesn't know what they are talking about. I would wince every time you posted if I were a liberal. Fortunately for me, I'm a constitutional conservative so I smile every time you post because you are showing everyone what not to be. An uninformed libtard who supports unconstitutional government and illegal activity.

You obviously have not read the document you claim to hold so dear

"We the People" constituted a government to represent us. That "Constitution" primarily establishes the branches of Government to do the will of "We the People"
You take three words out of the entire document and you attempt to apply it nonsensically. If you would get an adult to help you read beyond the first three words you would realize that it ends with "do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America". The preamble was simply stating "we are creating this document". Nothing more. Would you like to try again RW?

You missed the point of the whole document

We the People constituted a government
That government serves We the People...not a piece of paper



"in America, the law is King. For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other."
Common Sense, Thomas Paine.



Clearly, Thomas Paine had a very different understanding of that "piece of paper" then you do.

You probably don't know that the United States Constitution is correctly known as 'the law of the land.'
Holy shit!
Political Chic is finally getting it

The law is king. Our courts interpret that law.
Show me a single enforceable "law" within our Constitution
 
As a matter of fact - it is a cookbook with all of the recipes that future generations are permitted to cook. If they want to cook anything else, they must legally alter the "cookbook" (that is an analogy for legally amending the U.S. Constitution junior).

Once again illustrating your egregious lack of understanding about the U.S. Constitution. It is really sad how you believe that the U.S. Constitution breaks down government into three branches (because you've never read the Constitution and that's all you've picked up here on USMB). Astounding display of ignorance. That is merely the horizontal separation of powers at the federal level. But our founders designed a vertical separation of powers first and foremost. As the 10th Amendment clearly states - anything outside of the 18 enumerated powers specifically delegated by the states to the federal government are reserved to the states themselves or the people.

Seriously RW - you are the gift that keeps on giving. Every time you post you illustrate how much the left doesn't know what they are talking about. I would wince every time you posted if I were a liberal. Fortunately for me, I'm a constitutional conservative so I smile every time you post because you are showing everyone what not to be. An uninformed libtard who supports unconstitutional government and illegal activity.

You obviously have not read the document you claim to hold so dear

"We the People" constituted a government to represent us. That "Constitution" primarily establishes the branches of Government to do the will of "We the People"
You take three words out of the entire document and you attempt to apply it nonsensically. If you would get an adult to help you read beyond the first three words you would realize that it ends with "do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America". The preamble was simply stating "we are creating this document". Nothing more. Would you like to try again RW?

You missed the point of the whole document

We the People constituted a government
That government serves We the People...not a piece of paper

"in America, the law is King. For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other."
Common Sense, Thomas Paine.

Clearly, Thomas Paine had a very different understanding of that "piece of paper" then you do.

You probably don't know that the United States Constitution is correctly known as 'the law of the land.'
Holy shit!
Political Chic is finally getting it

The law is king. Our courts interpret that law.
Show me a single enforceable "law" within our Constitution
What?!? The entire U.S. Constitution is an "enforceable" law if we have men and women of character. :cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
President Obama was, is, and always will be the superior choice to both of his opponents for President. Much like HRC is the clear superior choice to Drumpf.


Barack Obama has turned out to be the abject failure that we on the other side predicted he would be.

I just proved it.....as indicated by the fact that you didn't deny anything in the OP....

....most especially this:
I can certainly provide dozens and dozens of examples that prove the absurdity of this absurd executive's self-serving fairy tales, this is one of the most recent:

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. economy created the fewest number of jobs in more than five years in May as employment in the manufacturing and construction sectors fell sharply, suggesting a deterioration in the labor market ...Nonfarm payrolls increased by only 38,000 jobs last month, the smallest gain since September 2010, the Labor Department said on Friday. Underscoring the report's weakness, employers hired 59,000 fewer workers in March and April than previously reported. While the unemployment rate fell three-tenths of a percentage point to 4.7 percent in May, the lowest since November 2007, that was in part due to people dropping out of the labor force."
Weak U.S. employment report dims prospect of Fed rate hike


But...I fully recognize the reason for your continued support of this political miscarriage.....you recognize the same character flaws in yourself.
One need simply look at your choice of avi.
LOL Silly, silly PC, if at the end of President Obama's second term we are losing 500,000 jobs, and the market is headed straight down.you can make those claims. Otherwise, considering what the GOP left him on 20Jan09, I would say that he has done an excellent job. 4.7% unemployment, market at about 18,000. And all of this in spite of the efforts of the GOP to destroy the economy. And now it looks like the GOP has destroyed itself.
Unemployment has been double-digits during Obama entire reign of terror. And only a blind little minion doesn't know otherwise. A record 94 million have dropped out of the labor participation force.
 
You obviously have not read the document you claim to hold so dear

"We the People" constituted a government to represent us. That "Constitution" primarily establishes the branches of Government to do the will of "We the People"
You take three words out of the entire document and you attempt to apply it nonsensically. If you would get an adult to help you read beyond the first three words you would realize that it ends with "do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America". The preamble was simply stating "we are creating this document". Nothing more. Would you like to try again RW?

You missed the point of the whole document

We the People constituted a government
That government serves We the People...not a piece of paper

"in America, the law is King. For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other."
Common Sense, Thomas Paine.

Clearly, Thomas Paine had a very different understanding of that "piece of paper" then you do.

You probably don't know that the United States Constitution is correctly known as 'the law of the land.'
Holy shit!
Political Chic is finally getting it

The law is king. Our courts interpret that law.
Show me a single enforceable "law" within our Constitution
What?!? The entire U.S. Constitution is an "enforceable" law of we have men and women of character. :cuckoo:

Who has ever been prosecuted for violating the Constitution?
What is the crime?
 
You take three words out of the entire document and you attempt to apply it nonsensically. If you would get an adult to help you read beyond the first three words you would realize that it ends with "do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America". The preamble was simply stating "we are creating this document". Nothing more. Would you like to try again RW?

You missed the point of the whole document

We the People constituted a government
That government serves We the People...not a piece of paper

"in America, the law is King. For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other."
Common Sense, Thomas Paine.

Clearly, Thomas Paine had a very different understanding of that "piece of paper" then you do.

You probably don't know that the United States Constitution is correctly known as 'the law of the land.'
Holy shit!
Political Chic is finally getting it

The law is king. Our courts interpret that law.
Show me a single enforceable "law" within our Constitution
What?!? The entire U.S. Constitution is an "enforceable" law of we have men and women of character. :cuckoo:

Who has ever been prosecuted for violating the Constitution?
What is the crime?
Who has ever been prosecuted for the murder of "the Black Dahlia"? Just because someone hasn't been prosecuted for a crime doesn't make the crime ok. :cuckoo:

You're essentially proving my point here. We don't have men or women of character in Washington. The Dumbocrats aren't going to impeach one of their own who violate the U.S. Constitution, and Republican's aren't going to impeach one of their own who violate the U.S. Constitution. And both sides have a certain level of reservation of doing so against the other side for fear of how the other side will use it against them politically.

It's all enforceable - we just need people of character. That's personally why I believe we need to overhaul our system of becoming a candidate as the starting point for fixing America.
 
Who has ever been prosecuted for violating the Constitution?
What is the crime?
Take your pick...

“The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” (Article II, Section 4)


If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured (Title 18 §241)


Whoever violates the provision of section 7311 of title 5 that an individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he -
(1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;
(2) is a member of an organization that he knows advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;
(3) participates in a strike, or asserts the right to strike, against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia; or
(4) is a member of an organization of employees of the Government of the United States or of individuals employed by the government of the District of Columbia that he knows asserts the right to strike against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia; shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year and a day, or both. (Title 18 USC §1918)
 

Forum List

Back
Top