*America Is Watching*

Sorry bout that,
'WATCHING'
1. There goes the funding of liberal broadcasting paid by the public.
2. Should of squeezed in more points of view, we have been monitoring PBS and NPR for years, its time to go into that perminate sleep, you shall not be missed, we will throw a party over your graves.
3. Sure lets see if you can scrape up the money it will take to keep recording, and the lights on.
4. Every libturd might chip in a couple bucks.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
Sorry bout that,

1. Libtard Judge lets out murderer to murder more innocent people by reducing this murders bond, someone will be dead because of it.
2. Blood will be on the judgie wudgies hands.



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
Sorry bout that,

1. She supports a murderer.
2. Its the bushy eyebrows she likes.
3. She's a crack pot libnut!
4. He deserves to be stuffed in the back of prison.



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
Sorry bout that,

1. They are not counting our votes, same as double voting.
2. They are eating our pets and not counting our votes at same time.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
Sorry bout that,

1. Donkey Meet Carrot!
2. Seems like sound removal give em a way to self deport, only come back if you get thet papers that say you can return.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
Sorry bout that,

1. Talking over Trump wont change things.
2. Just shows how bad he is beating your ******* heads in.
3. Better for them to not show anything on Trump, I'm sure he will find out about it, and make some waves in NBC cesspool.



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
Sorry bout that,

1. He is a gang member, nothing to see here.
2. Rotting in jail now, with the other gang members.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
Sorry bout that,

1. This guy Garcia is an illegal, and to bring back an illegal? really?
2. Some one would really be stupid to try and smuggle this guy into America, they too would be thrown into a jail cell.
3. Well he's from El Salvador, its his home country, whenever he gets out he should really think about settling down there.
4. I think 20 years he might go free, being rough housed with his head down will change a man.
5. Its sad when a perfectly unsavory man, who is led astray and is led around in prison, looking at the floor, thats the breaks.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
Sorry bout that,

1. Might as well try.
2. Could teach these warriors how to target Russia by air.
3. Not a bad idea.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
The only frauds are Trump and Musk.

“What you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening.”

This is almost a little too on-the-nose Orwellian. In 1984, George Orwell described the totalitarian government's ultimate demand of its subjects:
All of Orwell - both Animal Farm and 1984 -
is about CAPITALISM .
Ayou can see it right away.
And all attempts to say that it's about communism" is a common practice of capitalist market lovers to smear the more honest and progressive system with their own crap
 
All of Orwell - both Animal Farm and 1984 -
is about CAPITALISM .
Ayou can see it right away.
And all attempts to say that it's about communism" is a common practice of capitalist market lovers to smear the more honest and progressive system with their own crap
No, it isn't.

1984 is a book on authoritarianism and dystopia.

Trump and his cult embrace it.

The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. George Orwell, 1984.
 
15th post
No, it isn't.

1984 is a book on authoritarianism and dystopia.

Trump and his cult embrace it.

The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. George Orwell, 1984.
Yes, we embrace his writings as a WARNING about totalitarian COMMUNISM and idiots like YOU who rage over you false nemesis Emmanuel Orangestein with 24/7 Two-minutes HATE without reason.
You and Ringo should read Orwell again with that in mind.
 
Yes, we embrace his writings as a WARNING about totalitarian COMMUNISM
For those who like to consult AI on legal issues: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman admitted: everything a user writes in ChatGPT can be used in court. Not in theory, but in practice. This data has already been ruled admissible as evidence.

It's not a technicality, but a principle. Any question, input, reflection - stored, indexed, can be brought up when needed. If necessary - retrieved, correlated, presented. At the same time, which is important - the user himself cannot restore the correspondence.

The interlocutor in this case is not an assistant, but a logging system. You do not consult incognito, but leave a digital record. The system is no longer neutral. It participates - in information gathering, in profiling, in legal modeling.

Where once there was fear of wiretapping, now everything
is done openly. You initiate the contact yourself, transfer the content, give the material. And you do it voluntarily, under the guise of a request.
With AI being given procedural weight, any conversation with it becomes a move that could potentially be used against you - without consent, without notice, regardless of context.

Not because the system breaks the rules. It's because she herself is the rule. Her job is not to help, but to fix. From its point of view, everything you say is already a version of events. And the more you say, the clearer the system sees who you are.
***
Tell me more about "Big Brother" under communism, please!
 
For those who like to consult AI on legal issues: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman admitted: everything a user writes in ChatGPT can be used in court. Not in theory, but in practice. This data has already been ruled admissible as evidence.

It's not a technicality, but a principle. Any question, input, reflection - stored, indexed, can be brought up when needed. If necessary - retrieved, correlated, presented. At the same time, which is important - the user himself cannot restore the correspondence.

The interlocutor in this case is not an assistant, but a logging system. You do not consult incognito, but leave a digital record. The system is no longer neutral. It participates - in information gathering, in profiling, in legal modeling.

Where once there was fear of wiretapping, now everything
is done openly. You initiate the contact yourself, transfer the content, give the material. And you do it voluntarily, under the guise of a request.
With AI being given procedural weight, any conversation with it becomes a move that could potentially be used against you - without consent, without notice, regardless of context.

Not because the system breaks the rules. It's because she herself is the rule. Her job is not to help, but to fix. From its point of view, everything you say is already a version of events. And the more you say, the clearer the system sees who you are.
***
Tell me more about "Big Brother" under communism, please!
GIGO FOREVER 🤖
 
Back
Top Bottom