America Doesn't Have A Free Press Anymore

[jc456]

End of the day the malfeasant media thrives because their audience refuses to reason beyond the letters D and R. And the malfeasant media knows it. It doesn't matter that the letters D and R play on the same team. Nope. Huh uh. It's why they keep feeding their audience an endless feed of nonsensical, irrelevant pablum and distortion to pass around to everyone else. Which they will pass on to everyone else. Faithfully.

Personally, my view on things has changed. People deserve everything they get. And I hope they get it nice and good. Balls deep and nice and dry.

Call me when people start caring about things like the fact that our derelict congress just empowered our king to put us all in cages without charge nor trial. Call me when people start giving a flying fuck about the fact that our derelict congress just empowered our king to put us on the hook for trillions more dollars whenever he wants to arbitrarily send troops anywhere in the world for any arbitrary reason he wants without any constitutioal approval from our derelict congress.

In the mean time, consumers of malfeasant media are the main part of the problem. Manufactured bullshit is a supply and demand game. And it's thriving for no other reason that it is in demand.

What was the crime again? No one has stated it yet. Perv

 

[mudwhistle]

End of the day the malfeasant media thrives because their audience refuses to reason beyond the letters D and R. And the malfeasant media knows it. It doesn't matter that the letters D and R play on the same team. Nope. Huh uh. It's why they keep feeding their audience an endless feed of nonsensical, irrelevant pablum and distortion to pass around to everyone else. Which they will pass on to everyone else. Faithfully.

Personally, my view on things has changed. People deserve everything they get. And I hope they get it nice and good. Balls deep and nice and dry.

Call me when people start caring about things like the fact that our derelict congress just empowered our king to put us all in cages without charge nor trial. Call me when people start giving a flying fuck about the fact that our derelict congress just empowered our king to put us on the hook for trillions more dollars whenever he wants to arbitrarily send troops anywhere in the world for any arbitrary reason he wants without any constitutional approval from our derelict congress.

In the mean time, consumers of malfeasant media are the main part of the problem. Manufactured bullshit is a supply and demand game. And it's thriving for no other reason that it is in demand. And there's no such thing as left and right. That's another illusion. There's just as many big-government, big-spending statists who identify as 'right' as there are those whom identify as 'left'. Again, it's a load of horse pucky meant to forward the illusion of difference. There is no difference. You either want limited government or you fukin don't. Pick one.

Who's the fucking king?

If you think it's Trump then your complaint is totally bogus.

 

[jc456]

End of the day the malfeasant media thrives because their audience refuses to reason beyond the letters D and R. And the malfeasant media knows it. It doesn't matter that the letters D and R play on the same team. Nope. Huh uh. It's why they keep feeding their audience an endless feed of nonsensical, irrelevant pablum and distortion to pass around to everyone else. Which they will pass on to everyone else. Faithfully.

Personally, my view on things has changed. People deserve everything they get. And I hope they get it nice and good. Balls deep and nice and dry.

Call me when people start caring about things like the fact that our derelict congress just empowered our king to put us all in cages without charge nor trial. Call me when people start giving a flying fuck about the fact that our derelict congress just empowered our king to put us on the hook for trillions more dollars whenever he wants to arbitrarily send troops anywhere in the world for any arbitrary reason he wants without any constitutional approval from our derelict congress.

In the mean time, consumers of malfeasant media are the main part of the problem. Manufactured bullshit is a supply and demand game. And it's thriving for no other reason that it is in demand. And there's no such thing as left and right. That's another illusion. There's just as many big-government, big-spending statists who identify as 'right' as there are those whom identify as 'left'. Again, it's a load of horse pucky meant to forward the illusion of difference. There is no difference. You either want limited government or you fukin don't. Pick one.

King? people voted for trump. did you miss that? just wondering how it is that you get to define his presidency as anything but a presidency? WE haven't had another vote after 2016 yet by the people to continue with him or not yet as far as I can tell. So when did we turn over voting to a Magistrate? what year was that election?

 

[Natural Citizen]

Who's the fucking king?

If you think it's Trump then your complaint is totally bogus.

King? people voted for trump.

How much of our law must be written down and voted on VS. how much can be made up by appointees of the President?

We elect a king every 4 years.


For instance. Let's just pick one out of the hat. How's that?

An important development in the legal wrangling over the separation of powers.

It was that delegation of legislative authority to the executive that sparked Gorsuch's ire. "The rule that prevents Congress from giving the executive carte blanche to write laws for sex offenders is the same rule that protects everyone else," the justice wrote in dissent.

According to Gorsuch, SORNA combined the lawmaking powers of Congress with the law enforcement powers of the executive, and then gave those combined powers to a single federal official. For the Supreme Court to let that outcome stand, Gorsuch argued, marks "the end of any meaningful enforcement of our separation of powers."

 

[jc456]

Who's the fucking king?

If you think it's Trump then your complaint is totally bogus.

King? people voted for trump.

How much of our law must be written down and voted on VS. how much can be made up by appointees of the President?

We elect a king every 4 years.


For instance. Let's just pick one out of the hat. How's that?

An important development in the legal wrangling over the separation of powers.

It was that delegation of legislative authority to the executive that sparked Gorsuch's ire. "The rule that prevents Congress from giving the executive carte blanche to write laws for sex offenders is the same rule that protects everyone else," the justice wrote in dissent.

According to Gorsuch, SORNA combined the lawmaking powers of Congress with the law enforcement powers of the executive, and then gave those combined powers to a single federal official. For the Supreme Court to let that outcome stand, Gorsuch argued, marks "the end of any meaningful enforcement of our separation of powers."

A king can't be removed. ANd if all president's have the same authority, I give a shit. Congress isn't doing the people's work, that's on them. Courts are there to control the authority. It's what makes our constitution so great. So, you're mistaken. sorry, every four years a new president is voted in by the people. I know of no monarchy that does that. please educate me on the ones that do,

 

[Rye Catcher]

American doesn't have a press period. It has a Dem controlled propaganda ministry.

What news sources do you use? Fox? Breitbart? Do you ever read a newspaper or just rely on the bullshit you see here?

Fox, Brietbart, Gateway Pundit are no different from NBC ABC CBS PBS NPR MSNBC CNN NYT WAPO ETC...they are all run by a select group of billionaires with considerable control imposed by US government intelligence agencies.

Seems you've not offered any evidence that Billionaires run everything or the intelligence agencies have considerable control of the mediums. Please post some credible evidence.

 

[Natural Citizen]

A king can't be removed. ANd if all president's have the same authority, I give a shit. Congress isn't doing the people's work, that's on them. Courts are there to control the authority. It's what makes our constitution so great. So, you're mistaken. sorry, every four years a new president is voted in by the people. I know of no monarchy that does that. please educate me on the ones that do,

You're effectively voting in a new king every four years. Today, most law is made up by his appointees. Your Congress is derelict. There's no real separation of powers. And now he can put you in a cage with neither charge not trial. Wage war any place in the world he wants with no constitutional congresional oversight. Take guns first, give due process second. I could keep going on and on.

Whatever, though. You can ignore reality if you want.

Proceed...

 

[jc456]

Who's the fucking king?

If you think it's Trump then your complaint is totally bogus.

King? people voted for trump.

How much of our law must be written down and voted on VS. how much can be made up by appointees of the President?

We elect a king every 4 years.


For instance. Let's just pick one out of the hat. How's that?

An important development in the legal wrangling over the separation of powers.

It was that delegation of legislative authority to the executive that sparked Gorsuch's ire. "The rule that prevents Congress from giving the executive carte blanche to write laws for sex offenders is the same rule that protects everyone else," the justice wrote in dissent.

According to Gorsuch, SORNA combined the lawmaking powers of Congress with the law enforcement powers of the executive, and then gave those combined powers to a single federal official. For the Supreme Court to let that outcome stand, Gorsuch argued, marks "the end of any meaningful enforcement of our separation of powers."

A king can't be removed. ANd if all president's have the same authority, I give a shit. Congress isn't doing the people's work, that's on them. Courts are there to control the authority. It's what makes our constitution so great. So, you're mistaken. sorry, every four years a new president is voted in by the people. I know of no monarchy that does that. please educate me on the ones that do,

You're effectively voting in a new king every four years. Today, most law is made up by his appointees. Your Congress is derelict. There's no real separation of powers. And now he can put you in a cage with neither charge not trial. Wage war any place in the world he wants wit hno constitutional congresional oversight. I could keep going on and on.

Whatever, though. You can ignore reality if you want.

Proceed...

well son, it is the only position that a national vote occurs for. all local elections are there for those who live in their states. I live in a fking dump state, Illinois and the dems have fked me in the ass for years here. it gets worse on Wednesday. So don't dare tell me that trump is king. you haven't a clue.

 

[Natural Citizen]

So don't dare tell me that trump is king. you haven't a clue.

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...it's a duck.

 

[jc456]

So don't dare tell me that trump is king. you haven't a clue.

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...it's a duck.

if it gets voted out of office, it isn't king, and ain't a duck.

 

[Natural Citizen]

if it gets voted out of office, it isn't king, and ain't a duck.

But it can still put you in a cage without charge nor trial while it on its throne. And so can the next one. And the next one. And the next one....

That's never gonna change so long as people don't think beyond meaningless catch phrases like left and right. It's never gonna change so long as people refuse to discuss things beyond the letters D and R. It's never gonna change so long as the important issues of the day consist largely of who watches what channel on the idiot box.

 

[OldLady]

The media cannot be trusted.

Why?

Because the left controls them completely.

The United States of America no longer has a free press as of December 2019.

Press freedom was already in danger, as Mark Levin noted, as journalists became political activists in the Obama era, and feuded with the president in the Trump era. But press freedom could have thrived in a more openly partisan marketplace of ideas. In the end, press freedom was killed by the press itself, in the decision not to report the name of the so-called “whistleblower” in the impeachment crisis.

His name — which Breitbart News published after it was first revealed by RealClearInvestigations — is no mystery. Apparently, his identity was the worst-kept secret in Washington, D.C. The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) concluded in September that the “whistleblower,” a CIA employee, had shown “political bias,” and favored “a rival political candidate,” most likely former Vice President Joe Biden, for whom he reportedly worked.

Too long--edited

Any media outlet that wanted to share its content online — in other words, any media company that wanted to stay in business — had to suppress the name of the so-called “whistleblower” in impeachment coverage.

Pollak: Media, Tech Self-Censorship over 'Whistleblower' Marks Death of Free Press in United States | Breitbart​

Where did you read that, Mud? Breitbart. Don't forget Sinclair. Fox. Limbaugh, Hannnity, Carr, et al.
You are totally full of shit.

 

[gipper]

American doesn't have a press period. It has a Dem controlled propaganda ministry.

What news sources do you use? Fox? Breitbart? Do you ever read a newspaper or just rely on the bullshit you see here?

Fox, Brietbart, Gateway Pundit are no different from NBC ABC CBS PBS NPR MSNBC CNN NYT WAPO ETC...they are all run by a select group of billionaires with considerable control imposed by US government intelligence agencies.

Seems you've not offered any evidence that Billionaires run everything or the intelligence agencies have considerable control of the mediums. Please post some credible evidence.

Done it so many times before, I didn’t think it necessary. Redundancy is wasteful, but here goes again.

Do you know six billionaires control much of the MSM?
Have you ever heard of and researched the findings of the Church Committee?
Are you aware the Douma gas attack was a false flag, which the MSM won’t report?
The 12 Strongest Arguments That Douma Was A False Flag
Have you ever read these words uttered by CIA Director from over 30 years ago?

If you don’t know any of this, you really need to get informed

 

[Rye Catcher]

American doesn't have a press period. It has a Dem controlled propaganda ministry.

What news sources do you use? Fox? Breitbart? Do you ever read a newspaper or just rely on the bullshit you see here?

Fox, Brietbart, Gateway Pundit are no different from NBC ABC CBS PBS NPR MSNBC CNN NYT WAPO ETC...they are all run by a select group of billionaires with considerable control imposed by US government intelligence agencies.

Seems you've not offered any evidence that Billionaires run everything or the intelligence agencies have considerable control of the mediums. Please post some credible evidence.

Done it so many times before, I didn’t think it necessary. Redundancy is wasteful, but here goes again.

Do you know six billionaires control much of the MSM?
Have you ever heard of and researched the findings of the Church Committee?
Are you aware the Douma gas attack was a false flag, which the MSM won’t report?
The 12 Strongest Arguments That Douma Was A False Flag
Have you ever read these words uttered by CIA Director from over 30 years ago?

If you don’t know any of this, you really need to get informed

The Church Committee is outdated, the reader should take note that Nixon was President and J. Edgar Hoover was the Director of the FBI from 1924 until 1972.

See this link to President Reagan's Administration's Disinformation:

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP90-00965R000807550012-7.pdf

Suggesting all Journalists and editorial writers in diverse publications and talking heads on radio and television talk the same line is today ridiculous.

 

[gipper]

American doesn't have a press period. It has a Dem controlled propaganda ministry.

What news sources do you use? Fox? Breitbart? Do you ever read a newspaper or just rely on the bullshit you see here?

Fox, Brietbart, Gateway Pundit are no different from NBC ABC CBS PBS NPR MSNBC CNN NYT WAPO ETC...they are all run by a select group of billionaires with considerable control imposed by US government intelligence agencies.

Seems you've not offered any evidence that Billionaires run everything or the intelligence agencies have considerable control of the mediums. Please post some credible evidence.

Done it so many times before, I didn’t think it necessary. Redundancy is wasteful, but here goes again.

Do you know six billionaires control much of the MSM?
Have you ever heard of and researched the findings of the Church Committee?
Are you aware the Douma gas attack was a false flag, which the MSM won’t report?
The 12 Strongest Arguments That Douma Was A False Flag
Have you ever read these words uttered by CIA Director from over 30 years ago?

If you don’t know any of this, you really need to get informed

The Church Committee is outdated, the reader should take note that Nixon was President and J. Edgar Hoover was the Director of the FBI from 1924 until 1972.

See this link to President Reagan's Administration's Disinformation:

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP90-00965R000807550012-7.pdf

Suggesting all Journalists and editorial writers in diverse publications and talking heads on radio and television talk the same line is today ridiculous.

The lying, disinformation, and propaganda continues today and is much more prevalent, since only six men control most of the MSM.

I have never stated or suggested ALL journalists are controlled but most in the MSM are, and it’s obvious.

 

[Rye Catcher]

What news sources do you use? Fox? Breitbart? Do you ever read a newspaper or just rely on the bullshit you see here?

Fox, Brietbart, Gateway Pundit are no different from NBC ABC CBS PBS NPR MSNBC CNN NYT WAPO ETC...they are all run by a select group of billionaires with considerable control imposed by US government intelligence agencies.

Seems you've not offered any evidence that Billionaires run everything or the intelligence agencies have considerable control of the mediums. Please post some credible evidence.

Done it so many times before, I didn’t think it necessary. Redundancy is wasteful, but here goes again.

Do you know six billionaires control much of the MSM?
Have you ever heard of and researched the findings of the Church Committee?
Are you aware the Douma gas attack was a false flag, which the MSM won’t report?
The 12 Strongest Arguments That Douma Was A False Flag
Have you ever read these words uttered by CIA Director from over 30 years ago?

If you don’t know any of this, you really need to get informed

The Church Committee is outdated, the reader should take note that Nixon was President and J. Edgar Hoover was the Director of the FBI from 1924 until 1972.

See this link to President Reagan's Administration's Disinformation:

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP90-00965R000807550012-7.pdf

Suggesting all Journalists and editorial writers in diverse publications and talking heads on radio and television talk the same line is today ridiculous.

The lying, disinformation, and propaganda continues today and is much more prevalent, since only six men control most of the MSM.

I have never stated or suggested ALL journalists are controlled but most in the MSM are, and it’s obvious.

Define Control.

First, Consider These:

Five Principles of Ethical Journalism - Ethical Journalism Network

Society of Professional Journalists - Wikipedia

Code of ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists - Journalist's Resource

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The media cannot be trusted.

Why?

Because the left controls them completely.

The United States of America no longer has a free press as of December 2019.

Press freedom was already in danger, as Mark Levin noted, as journalists became political activists in the Obama era, and feuded with the president in the Trump era. But press freedom could have thrived in a more openly partisan marketplace of ideas. In the end, press freedom was killed by the press itself, in the decision not to report the name of the so-called “whistleblower” in the impeachment crisis.

His name — which Breitbart News published after it was first revealed by RealClearInvestigations — is no mystery. Apparently, his identity was the worst-kept secret in Washington, D.C. The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) concluded in September that the “whistleblower,” a CIA employee, had shown “political bias,” and favored “a rival political candidate,” most likely former Vice President Joe Biden, for whom he reportedly worked.

The “whistleblower” triggered a process that could still lead to the ouster of the president. (His own lawyer, Mark S. Zaid, called for a “coup,” via impeachment, in January 2017, shortly after Trump had taken office.)

It would seem extraordinary for the world’s leading democracy to allow an election to be overturned based on the actions of a rogue CIA employee working with the opposition — and even stranger not to be told his name.

Moreover, the “whistleblower” himself admitted that he did not have first-hand information of the events he had described. It would seem an urgent matter of national security, and public interest, to know who was feeing him information — whether it was an enemy, foreign or domestic.

If the hysteria over Russian influence in the 2016 election had any useful lesson, it was that we ought to be curious about where information comes from, and why.

Yet the media have not only ignored the “whistleblower’s” name, but they have also actively suppressed it. That includes the conservative media.

Earlier this year, I appeared on a morning show in Los Angeles to discuss the impeachment inquiry. The moment I mentioned the name of the “whistleblower,” the hosts ended the interview.

The reason is twofold. First, most media outlets share the Democrats’ desire to be rid of Trump, and so joined them in pretending the “whistleblower” was protected by law. Federal law protects whistleblowers from retaliation, but they can often expect to be identified. The relevant law, the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act, only prevents the ICIG from identifying the whistleblower. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, (D-CA) invented a statutory right to whistleblower anonymity that he later tacitly admitted did not exist.

After insisting that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify, Schiff and the Democrats reversed themselves — once they were revealed to have lied to the public about their prior contact with him.

That ought to have made the media more curious, not less curious, about who the “whistleblower” was, and what his motivations and methods had been. Schiff then made up the idea that making the “whistleblower’s” name known would expose him to mortal danger. The media, who routinely ruin lives by publishing the names of both the guilty and the innocent, bought that line.

Second, the tech companies punished news outlets that dared to publish the name of the so-called “whistleblower.” Though tech giants like Facebook enjoy immunity from libel lawsuits under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, they behaved as if publishing the “whistleblower’s” name would expose them to serious legal risk.

Any media outlet that wanted to share its content online — in other words, any media company that wanted to stay in business — had to suppress the name of the so-called “whistleblower” in impeachment coverage.

Pollak: Media, Tech Self-Censorship over 'Whistleblower' Marks Death of Free Press in United States | Breitbart​

There must be about a 100:1 ratio between the left and right Press
do lib-dems control FOX and breitbart? pjmedia and the blaze?

24 hours 7 days a week of conservative hate radio?

don't you remember that thread where all you conservatives were BOASTING about FOX being the NUMBER1 watched network?

how can lib-dems control the media if most people watch fox news?

I won't even bother discussing or debating "MSM liberal bias" because it is OBVIOUS that RIGHT WING MEDIA bias is even worse!


basically.....you want right wing media DOMINATING the media and airwaves AND you want to SILENCE everyone else......and at the same time YOU want to whine about "liberal media censorship"

fuk you!

YOU are the one who wants CENSORSHIP!

Spot on, I agree with you 100%
These fuckers want to have it both ways.
Roger Ailes created Fox News with the very intention of putting a radical right wing spin to EVERYTHING. And started talking to Duh Donald about running for POTUS years ago.

 

[gipper]

Fox, Brietbart, Gateway Pundit are no different from NBC ABC CBS PBS NPR MSNBC CNN NYT WAPO ETC...they are all run by a select group of billionaires with considerable control imposed by US government intelligence agencies.

Seems you've not offered any evidence that Billionaires run everything or the intelligence agencies have considerable control of the mediums. Please post some credible evidence.

Done it so many times before, I didn’t think it necessary. Redundancy is wasteful, but here goes again.

Do you know six billionaires control much of the MSM?
Have you ever heard of and researched the findings of the Church Committee?
Are you aware the Douma gas attack was a false flag, which the MSM won’t report?
The 12 Strongest Arguments That Douma Was A False Flag
Have you ever read these words uttered by CIA Director from over 30 years ago?

If you don’t know any of this, you really need to get informed

The Church Committee is outdated, the reader should take note that Nixon was President and J. Edgar Hoover was the Director of the FBI from 1924 until 1972.

See this link to President Reagan's Administration's Disinformation:

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP90-00965R000807550012-7.pdf

Suggesting all Journalists and editorial writers in diverse publications and talking heads on radio and television talk the same line is today ridiculous.

The lying, disinformation, and propaganda continues today and is much more prevalent, since only six men control most of the MSM.

I have never stated or suggested ALL journalists are controlled but most in the MSM are, and it’s obvious.

Define Control.

First, Consider These:

Five Principles of Ethical Journalism - Ethical Journalism Network

Society of Professional Journalists - Wikipedia

Code of ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists - Journalist's Resource

That’s laughable. If you truly believe all members of the MSM follow ethical rules, we can debate no further.

 

[sparky]

~S~

 

[gipper]

~S~

I wonder if Rye Catcher knows this. Too many Americans are ignorant of their consolidated controlled media, and it’s harmful consequences.