The Mainstream Media Will Never Recover From These Shocking Revelations About The Associated Press, The New York Times And Politico

[westwall]

Don’t confuse them with facts. They are incapable of differentiating fact from fiction so it’s a wasted effort.

You're the one confused.

 

[daveman]

Don’t confuse them with facts. They are incapable of differentiating fact from fiction so it’s a wasted effort.

He presented no facts; he presented an opinion. And since it's the same one you were told to believe by your handlers, you claim it's fact.

 

[westwall]

He presented no facts; he presented an opinion. And since it's the same one you were told to believe by your handlers, you claim it's fact.

Leftists don't understand the difference between opinion and fact. They lack that part of the brain that deals with critical thinking.

 

[toobfreak]

Don’t confuse them with facts. They are incapable of differentiating fact from fiction so it’s a wasted effort.

Gee, I had to double check, that sounded exactly like something Mac1958 would say, verbatim! Is he your sock?
I just hate it when a person presents no facts, then argues what a waste of time it would be to actually present any.
Kind of a cheap way of making no argument while allowing yourself the cognitive dissonance of thinking you won one,
wouldn't you say?

 

[toobfreak]

Leftists don't understand the difference between opinion and fact.

Probably because the only facts they concern themselves with or care about ARE their opinions.

They lack that part of the brain that deals with critical thinking.

Maybe because it takes none if you stop every time with said opinions and conclude that
you are so sure of their every conclusion that you never need to question any of them at all?

 

[Coyote]

Gee, I had to double check, that sounded exactly like something Mac1958 would say, verbatim! Is he your sock?
I just hate it when a person presents no facts, then argues what a waste of time it would be to actually present any.
Kind of a cheap way of making no argument while allowing yourself the cognitive dissonance of thinking you won one,
wouldn't you say?

He presented facts.

 

[toobfreak]

He presented facts.

I was actually talking about you! But if you refer to IQ2, going back and taking him off Ignore, all I see is one unsubstantiated CLAIM about how Politico was or was not funded.

Let's be clear here: I realize this is just social media and most of us just come here for shits and giggles, but:

IN THE ARENA OF LOGIC, we deal solely in validities and invalidities, which lead us to Truths.

IN THE ARENA OF LEGAL ARGUMENT, we deal solely in postulations or assertions, which are only elevated to becoming FACTS once they can be corroborated beyond any reasonable doubt, not merely because they favor one's own position.

Not one "fact" was presented here.

 

[IM2]

You mean with Word Salad Kamala?

Trump was the word salad, but you didn't care, because he spoke the racist language you like.

 

[IM2]

I was actually talking about you! But if you refer to IQ2, going back and taking him off Ignore, all I see is one unsubstantiated CLAIM about how Politico was or was not funded.

Let's be clear here: I realize this is just social media and most of us just come here for shits and giggles, but:

IN THE ARENA OF LOGIC, we deal solely in validities and invalidities, which lead us to Truths.

IN THE ARENA OF LEGAL ARGUMENT, we deal solely in postulations or assertions, which are only elevated to becoming FACTS once they can be corroborated beyond any reasonable doubt, not merely because they favor one's own position.

Not one "fact" was presented here.

The claim was substantiated and it is a matter of fact. So you go on and believe some idiot on X. You don't deal in logic.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Those aren't "revelations" they're unfounded rumors

Democrats are scurrying away like cockroaches that they are LOL

 

[San Souci]

Trump was the word salad, but you didn't care, because he spoke the racist language you like.

Polly want a cracker? "Racist" really has no meaning. Just the sound that Dems parrot all the time. Even MATH is racist because ghetto trash are to stupid to master it,

 

[IM2]

Polly want a cracker? "Racist" really has no meaning. Just the sound that Dems parrot all the time. Even MATH is racist because ghetto trash are to stupid to master it,

Racist does have a meaning and no matter how many times you racists want to tell yourself that lie, it will still have a meaning.

 

[San Souci]

Racist does have a meaning and no matter how many times you racists want to tell yourself that lie, it will still have a meaning.

CRAWWWKK! Polly Want a cracker?

 

[daveman]

Trump was the word salad, but you didn't care, because he spoke the racist language you like.

 

[daveman]

Racist does have a meaning and no matter how many times you racists want to tell yourself that lie, it will still have a meaning.

Nope, still not buyin' it. I know! Maybe you could try threatening to hold your breath until you turn blue, like the idiot child you are.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Here Reuters admits that so-called "mainstream" media gets funding from the federal government in the form of subscriptions. Not the thirty dollars a month we used to pay the paperboy, but millions of dollars.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/news-outlets-reject-trump-accusations-usaid-media-payoff-2025-02-07/

Trump on Thursday accused Politico, which he referred to as "the left wing 'rag'," of receiving $8 million from USAID. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced a day earlier the government would cancel more than $8 million of subscription expenditure to the news organization.
Politico in a statement, opens new tab Thursday said the organization had never received U.S. government funding but that some government agencies subscribe to Politico Pro, a policy intelligence news platform. Politico did not disclose the amount its government customers spent on subscriptions.
Too late, we already know.

A New York Times spokesperson on Friday told Reuters that USAID did not provide funding to the company. A day earlier the newspaper in a statement, opens new tab said, "Federal funds received by The Times are payments for subscriptions that government offices and agencies have purchased to better understand the world." It added that no federal grants were made to the news outlet.

How much?

BBC took a page from Hillary Clinton's book, laundering the USAID money through a charity it set up for such purposes.

The BBC’s finances came under scrutiny in early February after Musk shared a post that said USAID funds the broadcaster. Its charity wing BBC Media Action, which received funds from USAID and other donors, is independently funded and editorially separate from BBC News, a BBC Media Action spokesperson told Reuters.
Reuters, which also faced online accusations it was funded by government agencies, said it didn’t have a contractual relationship with USAID. “As with all news agency customers, governments pay a fee for Reuters news services.

Again, how much?

From now on, we don't have to wonder whether to call it "legacy media," "mainstream media," "Clinton News Network," or whatever else. It is State-sponsored Media, and that's fact, not opinion.

Do fedemps really sit around reading these news sources on taxpayer time? I suppose the ones in charge of making sure that the Democrats are getting our money's worth have to, huh?

I suppose instead of laying by their pool while "teleworking," those fedemps, sit in lawn chairs on their driveways waiting for the New York Times to be tossed to them.

For eight million dollars, that paperboy should be driving a motorcycle with a supermodel in the sidecar who can land the paper right in your lap.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Nope, still not buyin' it. I know! Maybe you could try threatening to hold your breath until you turn blue, like the idiot child you are.

RACISM!!!

SEXISM!!!

HOMOPHOBIA!!!!

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Politica wasn't awarded 8.1 million from USAID.

Is that Politico's trans relative?

 

[OKTexas]

REMINDER: EVERY POST MUST CONTAIN CONTENT DRIECTLY RELATED TO THE TOPIC.