Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What is your point?List of countries by GDP (nominal) - WikipediaWhat is your source?Refute trump if you canHis speech was nothing but lies and conspiracy theories.
he said biden should not give the WHO when china pays only $39 mil
Report for Selected Countries and Subjects (imf.org)
I hope you’re not claiming china is a poor country
because its not
Neither does Amazon.I dont try to bury them under a rock
That’s what I’ve been saying this whole time.if they write in as an employee they are not protected,,
they arent protected if theyre an employee posting for the company,, but are if theyre speaking as an individual,,,That’s what I’ve been saying this whole time.if they write in as an employee they are not protected,,
Same exact protections.
That’s what I’ve been saying the whole time.they arent protected if theyre an employee posting for the company,, but are if theyre speaking as an individual,,,That’s what I’ve been saying this whole time.if they write in as an employee they are not protected,,
Same exact protections.
I dont have protections on my website if I post on the comments section because I am not an outside provider,,, neither do my employees if they do the same if they are posting for the company,,
They are trying to suppress ideas by not carrying the bookNeither does Amazon.
That’s what I’ve been saying the whole time.they arent protected if theyre an employee posting for the company,, but are if theyre speaking as an individual,,,That’s what I’ve been saying this whole time.if they write in as an employee they are not protected,,
Same exact protections.
I dont have protections on my website if I post on the comments section because I am not an outside provider,,, neither do my employees if they do the same if they are posting for the company,,
This is true no matter what website you’re talking about. It’s the same exact protections.
Don't buy them. That is a choice. Amazon sucks anyway.They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.
From The Daily Wire:
As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.
remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??
We despise hate books.
I have "The Bell Curve".‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.
From The Daily Wire:
As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.
remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??
‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.
You know all about the ongoing and very real and well documented Big Tech Purge that the media pretends doesn’t exist. And about Amazon’s removal of a book about the transgender movemen…therightscoop.com
ODD. I just bought Rush Limbaugh's book off Amazon.
I just bought an HP Lovecraft book.
Are you suppressing ideas by not perpetuating them?They are trying to suppress ideas by not carrying the book
Well the court ruled they could, but that's their prerogative. It goes back and forth.but if youre a conservative baker, florist or photographer you are forced against you will to participate,,,Sure it is, they are both independent companies. Who decides what books to sell on amazon, is you you!!thats not the issue and you know it,,,Amazon had the right to delete books as the lady has the right for natural women to compete in the "beauty contest".They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.
From The Daily Wire:
As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.
remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??
We despise hate books.
Then you better stop reading about 90 percent of everything printed by liberals..... sorry to say you eat your foot just about every time your yap opens six inches.
JO
I won't go to their places, and I refuse to sue them as well, as there's too much suing going on for minor stuff.
good for you,,,
but as we saw the gays did sue them and stole their money with the help of the government,,,
but the outcome remains the same,, the government forced a person to do something they didnt want to do,,,
your word games are hilarious,,,Are you suppressing ideas by not perpetuating them?They are trying to suppress ideas by not carrying the book
Those protections were written specifically to give websites the ability to control who is allowed to comment.OK so if they want to control whos allowed to comment they should loose those protections since thats why they are there,,,
Well the court ruled they could, but that's their prerogative. It goes back and forth.but if youre a conservative baker, florist or photographer you are forced against you will to participate,,,Sure it is, they are both independent companies. Who decides what books to sell on amazon, is you you!!thats not the issue and you know it,,,Amazon had the right to delete books as the lady has the right for natural women to compete in the "beauty contest".They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.
From The Daily Wire:
As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.
remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??
We despise hate books.
Then you better stop reading about 90 percent of everything printed by liberals..... sorry to say you eat your foot just about every time your yap opens six inches.
JO
I won't go to their places, and I refuse to sue them as well, as there's too much suing going on for minor stuff.
good for you,,,
but as we saw the gays did sue them and stole their money with the help of the government,,,
but the outcome remains the same,, the government forced a person to do something they didnt want to do,,,
They just don't see it.....it's a form of mental illness I'm tellin'ya. It's never wrong as long as the purpose advances liberalism. They are the ultimate " ends justfies the means " morons that will never be able to grasp the concept of fairness.
Well the court ruled they could, but that's their prerogative. It goes back and forth.but if youre a conservative baker, florist or photographer you are forced against you will to participate,,,Sure it is, they are both independent companies. Who decides what books to sell on amazon, is you you!!thats not the issue and you know it,,,Amazon had the right to delete books as the lady has the right for natural women to compete in the "beauty contest".They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.
From The Daily Wire:
As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.
remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??
We despise hate books.
Then you better stop reading about 90 percent of everything printed by liberals..... sorry to say you eat your foot just about every time your yap opens six inches.
JO
I won't go to their places, and I refuse to sue them as well, as there's too much suing going on for minor stuff.
good for you,,,
but as we saw the gays did sue them and stole their money with the help of the government,,,
but the outcome remains the same,, the government forced a person to do something they didnt want to do,,,
They just don't see it.....it's a form of mental illness I'm tellin'ya. It's never wrong as long as the purpose advances liberalism. They are the ultimate " ends justfies the means " morons that will never be able to grasp the concept of fairness.
they already had that ability cause its their website,,Those protections were written specifically to give websites the ability to control who is allowed to comment.OK so if they want to control whos allowed to comment they should loose those protections since thats why they are there,,,
If a website didn’t control who is allowed to comment, they’d have no liability regardless of the law you quoted.
The thread's beyond silly, but you raise a fair point imo. Should social media sites have immunity when someone posts objectively proven false information?Those protections were written specifically to give websites the ability to control who is allowed to comment.OK so if they want to control whos allowed to comment they should loose those protections since thats why they are there,,,
If a website didn’t control who is allowed to comment, they’d have no liability regardless of the law you quoted.
Well the court ruled they could, but that's their prerogative. It goes back and forth.but if youre a conservative baker, florist or photographer you are forced against you will to participate,,,Sure it is, they are both independent companies. Who decides what books to sell on amazon, is you you!!thats not the issue and you know it,,,Amazon had the right to delete books as the lady has the right for natural women to compete in the "beauty contest".They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.
From The Daily Wire:
As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.
remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??
We despise hate books.
Then you better stop reading about 90 percent of everything printed by liberals..... sorry to say you eat your foot just about every time your yap opens six inches.
JO
I won't go to their places, and I refuse to sue them as well, as there's too much suing going on for minor stuff.
good for you,,,
but as we saw the gays did sue them and stole their money with the help of the government,,,
but the outcome remains the same,, the government forced a person to do something they didnt want to do,,,
They just don't see it.....it's a form of mental illness I'm tellin'ya. It's never wrong as long as the purpose advances liberalism. They are the ultimate " end justifies the means " morons that will never be able to grasp the concept of fairness.
That's because they're sociopaths, in that they utterly lack any ability for empathy - however much they claim to be "empathizing" with their selected victim groups du jour - and cannot genuinely put themselves into another's place.
Well it could be you folks are just as much a victim as the gays who sue rather than just buyign a cake elswwhere. There's no lack of sellers of media for rw xians.Well the court ruled they could, but that's their prerogative. It goes back and forth.but if youre a conservative baker, florist or photographer you are forced against you will to participate,,,Sure it is, they are both independent companies. Who decides what books to sell on amazon, is you you!!thats not the issue and you know it,,,Amazon had the right to delete books as the lady has the right for natural women to compete in the "beauty contest".They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.
From The Daily Wire:
As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.
remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??
We despise hate books.
Then you better stop reading about 90 percent of everything printed by liberals..... sorry to say you eat your foot just about every time your yap opens six inches.
JO
I won't go to their places, and I refuse to sue them as well, as there's too much suing going on for minor stuff.
good for you,,,
but as we saw the gays did sue them and stole their money with the help of the government,,,
but the outcome remains the same,, the government forced a person to do something they didnt want to do,,,
They just don't see it.....it's a form of mental illness I'm tellin'ya. It's never wrong as long as the purpose advances liberalism. They are the ultimate " ends justfies the means " morons that will never be able to grasp the concept of fairness.
That's because they're sociopaths, in that they utterly lack any ability for empathy - however much they claim to be "empathizing" with their selected victim groups du jour - and cannot genuinely put themselves into another's place.
They are not there to be guardians of verity.....this is where they overstep. They offer an access service and anything short of predation, pornography or pedophilia is none of their business. If that's the case it won't be long before our thoughts are monitored for diverging opinions that can get us arrested. Right now the net is tightly controlled by wire access. Even the wireless services ultimately depend on wire connections at some point. When that is finally gone...there will be no possible way to monitor what happens or to control it Eventually computers will be independent of IP's....and the net will become a completely untamed animal....mark my words.The thread's beyond silly, but you raise a fair point imo. Should social media sites have immunity when someone posts objectively proven false information?Those protections were written specifically to give websites the ability to control who is allowed to comment.OK so if they want to control whos allowed to comment they should loose those protections since thats why they are there,,,
If a website didn’t control who is allowed to comment, they’d have no liability regardless of the law you quoted.
