Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.

[progressive hunter]

His speech was nothing but lies and conspiracy theories.

Refute trump if you can

he said biden should not give the WHO when china pays only $39 mil

1​	United States	20,807,269​
2​	China[n 2][n 3]	14,860,775​

What is your source?

List of countries by GDP (nominal) - Wikipedia

Report for Selected Countries and Subjects (imf.org)

What is your point?

I hope you’re not claiming china is a poor country

because its not

theyre not only not poor,, we have to borrow money from them to survive,,,

 

[colfax_m]

I dont try to bury them under a rock

Neither does Amazon.

 

[colfax_m]

if they write in as an employee they are not protected,,

That’s what I’ve been saying this whole time.

Same exact protections.

 

[progressive hunter]

if they write in as an employee they are not protected,,

That’s what I’ve been saying this whole time.

Same exact protections.

they arent protected if theyre an employee posting for the company,, but are if theyre speaking as an individual,,,

I dont have protections on my website if I post on the comments section because I am not an outside provider,,, neither do my employees if they do the same if they are posting for the company,,

 

[colfax_m]

if they write in as an employee they are not protected,,

That’s what I’ve been saying this whole time.

Same exact protections.

they arent protected if theyre an employee posting for the company,, but are if theyre speaking as an individual,,,

I dont have protections on my website if I post on the comments section because I am not an outside provider,,, neither do my employees if they do the same if they are posting for the company,,

That’s what I’ve been saying the whole time.

This is true no matter what website you’re talking about. It’s the same exact protections.

 

[Mac-7]

Neither does Amazon.

They are trying to suppress ideas by not carrying the book

 

[progressive hunter]

if they write in as an employee they are not protected,,

That’s what I’ve been saying this whole time.

Same exact protections.

they arent protected if theyre an employee posting for the company,, but are if theyre speaking as an individual,,,

I dont have protections on my website if I post on the comments section because I am not an outside provider,,, neither do my employees if they do the same if they are posting for the company,,

That’s what I’ve been saying the whole time.

This is true no matter what website you’re talking about. It’s the same exact protections.

OK so if they want to control whos allowed to comment they should loose those protections since thats why they are there,,,

 

[San Souci]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.

We despise hate books.

Don't buy them. That is a choice. Amazon sucks anyway.

 

[San Souci]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence. – The Right Scoop

therightscoop.com

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

ODD. I just bought Rush Limbaugh's book off Amazon.

I just bought an HP Lovecraft book.

I have "The Bell Curve".

 

[colfax_m]

They are trying to suppress ideas by not carrying the book

Are you suppressing ideas by not perpetuating them?

 

[justoffal]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.

We despise hate books.

Then you better stop reading about 90 percent of everything printed by liberals..... sorry to say you eat your foot just about every time your yap opens six inches.

JO

Amazon had the right to delete books as the lady has the right for natural women to compete in the "beauty contest".

thats not the issue and you know it,,,

Sure it is, they are both independent companies. Who decides what books to sell on amazon, is you you!!

but if youre a conservative baker, florist or photographer you are forced against you will to participate,,,

I won't go to their places, and I refuse to sue them as well, as there's too much suing going on for minor stuff.

good for you,,,

but as we saw the gays did sue them and stole their money with the help of the government,,,

Well the court ruled they could, but that's their prerogative. It goes back and forth.

but the outcome remains the same,, the government forced a person to do something they didnt want to do,,,

They just don't see it.....it's a form of mental illness I'm tellin'ya. It's never wrong as long as the purpose advances liberalism. They are the ultimate " ends justfies the means " morons that will never be able to grasp the concept of fairness.

 

[progressive hunter]

They are trying to suppress ideas by not carrying the book

Are you suppressing ideas by not perpetuating them?

your word games are hilarious,,,

 

[colfax_m]

OK so if they want to control whos allowed to comment they should loose those protections since thats why they are there,,,

Those protections were written specifically to give websites the ability to control who is allowed to comment.

If a website didn’t control who is allowed to comment, they’d have no liability regardless of the law you quoted.

 

[progressive hunter]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.

We despise hate books.

Then you better stop reading about 90 percent of everything printed by liberals..... sorry to say you eat your foot just about every time your yap opens six inches.

JO

Amazon had the right to delete books as the lady has the right for natural women to compete in the "beauty contest".

thats not the issue and you know it,,,

Sure it is, they are both independent companies. Who decides what books to sell on amazon, is you you!!

but if youre a conservative baker, florist or photographer you are forced against you will to participate,,,

I won't go to their places, and I refuse to sue them as well, as there's too much suing going on for minor stuff.

good for you,,,

but as we saw the gays did sue them and stole their money with the help of the government,,,

Well the court ruled they could, but that's their prerogative. It goes back and forth.

but the outcome remains the same,, the government forced a person to do something they didnt want to do,,,

They just don't see it.....it's a form of mental illness I'm tellin'ya. It's never wrong as long as the purpose advances liberalism. They are the ultimate " ends justfies the means " morons that will never be able to grasp the concept of fairness.

we need to stop calling them liberals and call the what they are,, PROGRESSIVES,,,

they stole that word because people got tired of prog policies and had to change it to liberal,,
time to steal it back,,

 

[Cecilie1200]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.

We despise hate books.

Then you better stop reading about 90 percent of everything printed by liberals..... sorry to say you eat your foot just about every time your yap opens six inches.

JO

Amazon had the right to delete books as the lady has the right for natural women to compete in the "beauty contest".

thats not the issue and you know it,,,

Sure it is, they are both independent companies. Who decides what books to sell on amazon, is you you!!

but if youre a conservative baker, florist or photographer you are forced against you will to participate,,,

I won't go to their places, and I refuse to sue them as well, as there's too much suing going on for minor stuff.

good for you,,,

but as we saw the gays did sue them and stole their money with the help of the government,,,

Well the court ruled they could, but that's their prerogative. It goes back and forth.

but the outcome remains the same,, the government forced a person to do something they didnt want to do,,,

They just don't see it.....it's a form of mental illness I'm tellin'ya. It's never wrong as long as the purpose advances liberalism. They are the ultimate " ends justfies the means " morons that will never be able to grasp the concept of fairness.

That's because they're sociopaths, in that they utterly lack any ability for empathy - however much they claim to be "empathizing" with their selected victim groups du jour - and cannot genuinely put themselves into another's place.

 

[progressive hunter]

OK so if they want to control whos allowed to comment they should loose those protections since thats why they are there,,,

Those protections were written specifically to give websites the ability to control who is allowed to comment.

If a website didn’t control who is allowed to comment, they’d have no liability regardless of the law you quoted.

they already had that ability cause its their website,,

the protections were to protect them from being sued for what outside providers post,,,

 

[bendog]

OK so if they want to control whos allowed to comment they should loose those protections since thats why they are there,,,

Those protections were written specifically to give websites the ability to control who is allowed to comment.

If a website didn’t control who is allowed to comment, they’d have no liability regardless of the law you quoted.

The thread's beyond silly, but you raise a fair point imo. Should social media sites have immunity when someone posts objectively proven false information?

 

[justoffal]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.

We despise hate books.

Then you better stop reading about 90 percent of everything printed by liberals..... sorry to say you eat your foot just about every time your yap opens six inches.

JO

Amazon had the right to delete books as the lady has the right for natural women to compete in the "beauty contest".

thats not the issue and you know it,,,

Sure it is, they are both independent companies. Who decides what books to sell on amazon, is you you!!

but if youre a conservative baker, florist or photographer you are forced against you will to participate,,,

I won't go to their places, and I refuse to sue them as well, as there's too much suing going on for minor stuff.

good for you,,,

but as we saw the gays did sue them and stole their money with the help of the government,,,

Well the court ruled they could, but that's their prerogative. It goes back and forth.

but the outcome remains the same,, the government forced a person to do something they didnt want to do,,,

They just don't see it.....it's a form of mental illness I'm tellin'ya. It's never wrong as long as the purpose advances liberalism. They are the ultimate " end justifies the means " morons that will never be able to grasp the concept of fairness.

That's because they're sociopaths, in that they utterly lack any ability for empathy - however much they claim to be "empathizing" with their selected victim groups du jour - and cannot genuinely put themselves into another's place.

 

[bendog]

‘END OF CONSERVATIVE BOOKS’: Amazon using ‘hate speech’ excuse to CENSOR & PURGE the right from existence.



From The Daily Wire:

As noted by The Daily Wire, Amazon has ramped up its censorship on conservative views in recent weeks. For example, a popular documentary on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was banned from their streaming service this past week. Before that move, the company deplatformed conservative Ryan Anderson’s book critical of gender theory, “When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement.

remind me again what party/group keeps accusing the other of being fascist??

They are a free enterprise just like the women who said no natural women in the beauty pageant.

We despise hate books.

Then you better stop reading about 90 percent of everything printed by liberals..... sorry to say you eat your foot just about every time your yap opens six inches.

JO

Amazon had the right to delete books as the lady has the right for natural women to compete in the "beauty contest".

thats not the issue and you know it,,,

Sure it is, they are both independent companies. Who decides what books to sell on amazon, is you you!!

but if youre a conservative baker, florist or photographer you are forced against you will to participate,,,

I won't go to their places, and I refuse to sue them as well, as there's too much suing going on for minor stuff.

good for you,,,

but as we saw the gays did sue them and stole their money with the help of the government,,,

Well the court ruled they could, but that's their prerogative. It goes back and forth.

but the outcome remains the same,, the government forced a person to do something they didnt want to do,,,

They just don't see it.....it's a form of mental illness I'm tellin'ya. It's never wrong as long as the purpose advances liberalism. They are the ultimate " ends justfies the means " morons that will never be able to grasp the concept of fairness.

That's because they're sociopaths, in that they utterly lack any ability for empathy - however much they claim to be "empathizing" with their selected victim groups du jour - and cannot genuinely put themselves into another's place.

Well it could be you folks are just as much a victim as the gays who sue rather than just buyign a cake elswwhere. There's no lack of sellers of media for rw xians.

 

[justoffal]

OK so if they want to control whos allowed to comment they should loose those protections since thats why they are there,,,

Those protections were written specifically to give websites the ability to control who is allowed to comment.

If a website didn’t control who is allowed to comment, they’d have no liability regardless of the law you quoted.

The thread's beyond silly, but you raise a fair point imo. Should social media sites have immunity when someone posts objectively proven false information?

They are not there to be guardians of verity.....this is where they overstep. They offer an access service and anything short of predation, pornography or pedophilia is none of their business. If that's the case it won't be long before our thoughts are monitored for diverging opinions that can get us arrested. Right now the net is tightly controlled by wire access. Even the wireless services ultimately depend on wire connections at some point. When that is finally gone...there will be no possible way to monitor what happens or to control it Eventually computers will be independent of IP's....and the net will become a completely untamed animal....mark my words.

JO