Amazingly, this actress actually understands why the democrat party purge of conservative social media is going to be really bad...

[2aguy]

The purge came early this year....they aren't even waiting for kamala harris to replace joe "the rapist" biden in office.....

democrat party big tech is purging conservatives from social media and the internet......one actress understands why this is going to end in blood and tears...

As many on the left applaud Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to indefinitely ban President Donald Trump from Facebook and Instagram, some are realizing that the Silicon Valley billionaire’s decision sets a dangerous precedent for the freedom of speech.

One such person is actress-model Emily Ratajkowski, who risked the scorn of her Hollywood peers and the mainstream media by expressing her concern about Zuckerberg’s decision to blacklist the president. “This gives Facebook/tech/Zuck THE MOST POWER. If he can shut the president up/off he can shut any of us up/off,” she tweeted on Thursday.

Actress Emily Ratajkowski: If Mark Zuckerberg Can Shut the President Off Facebook, He Can Shut Any of Us Off

As many on the left applaud Mark Zuckerberg's decision to indefinitely ban President Donald Trump from Facebook and Instagram, some are realizing, like actress Emily Ratajkowski, that the Silicon Valley billionaire's decision sets a dangerous precedent for the freedom of speech.

www.breitbart.com

 

[freyasman]

Losing your voice is a bad thing...... kind of like losing your vote is.
Most folks get that.

 

[Gdjjr]

They don't think ahead- they truly believe in sunshine and lollipops will be their reward

 

[LuckyDuck]

And the naïve will deny that "they" will ever be shut up/off, because they will claim that they think like Zuckerberg. What they don't realize is that Zuckerberg is taking his cues from China's CCP.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The purge came early this year....they aren't even waiting for kamala harris to replace joe "the rapist" biden in office.....

democrat party big tech is purging conservatives from social media and the internet......one actress understands why this is going to end in blood and tears...

As many on the left applaud Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to indefinitely ban President Donald Trump from Facebook and Instagram, some are realizing that the Silicon Valley billionaire’s decision sets a dangerous precedent for the freedom of speech.

One such person is actress-model Emily Ratajkowski, who risked the scorn of her Hollywood peers and the mainstream media by expressing her concern about Zuckerberg’s decision to blacklist the president. “This gives Facebook/tech/Zuck THE MOST POWER. If he can shut the president up/off he can shut any of us up/off,” she tweeted on Thursday.

Actress Emily Ratajkowski: If Mark Zuckerberg Can Shut the President Off Facebook, He Can Shut Any of Us Off

As many on the left applaud Mark Zuckerberg's decision to indefinitely ban President Donald Trump from Facebook and Instagram, some are realizing, like actress Emily Ratajkowski, that the Silicon Valley billionaire's decision sets a dangerous precedent for the freedom of speech.

www.breitbart.com

This fails as a strawman fallacy.

There is no Democratic ‘purge’ of conservative social media, the notion is a ridiculous lie.

 

[dudmuck]

And the naïve will deny that "they" will ever be shut up/off, because they will claim that they think like Zuckerberg. What they don't realize is that Zuckerberg is taking his cues from China's CCP.

 

[pknopp]

These venue's have long cut people off inciting people to riot. There is no such right in any manner to incite people to riot.

 

[RodISHI]

You should already have part of your scoring done too for when digital pocket books are issued.

https://botsentinel.com/profile/1172757380397846528

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The purge came early this year....they aren't even waiting for kamala harris to replace joe "the rapist" biden in office.....

democrat party big tech is purging conservatives from social media and the internet......one actress understands why this is going to end in blood and tears...

As many on the left applaud Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to indefinitely ban President Donald Trump from Facebook and Instagram, some are realizing that the Silicon Valley billionaire’s decision sets a dangerous precedent for the freedom of speech.

One such person is actress-model Emily Ratajkowski, who risked the scorn of her Hollywood peers and the mainstream media by expressing her concern about Zuckerberg’s decision to blacklist the president. “This gives Facebook/tech/Zuck THE MOST POWER. If he can shut the president up/off he can shut any of us up/off,” she tweeted on Thursday.

Actress Emily Ratajkowski: If Mark Zuckerberg Can Shut the President Off Facebook, He Can Shut Any of Us Off

As many on the left applaud Mark Zuckerberg's decision to indefinitely ban President Donald Trump from Facebook and Instagram, some are realizing, like actress Emily Ratajkowski, that the Silicon Valley billionaire's decision sets a dangerous precedent for the freedom of speech.

www.breitbart.com

This fails as a strawman fallacy.

There is no Democratic ‘purge’ of conservative social media, the notion is a ridiculous lie.

Why don't you actually learn something before shooting off your piehole?

 

[RodISHI]

These venue's have long cut people off inciting people to riot. There is no such right in any manner to incite people to riot.

Who are you saying is calling for riots. It sure isn't Trump or those who follow him. When we say fight it is with Spirit.

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."

 

[freyasman]

And the naïve will deny that "they" will ever be shut up/off, because they will claim that they think like Zuckerberg. What they don't realize is that Zuckerberg is taking his cues from China's CCP.

Absolutely correct.

Finally, we will get some alternatives.

 

[freyasman]

These venue's have long cut people off inciting people to riot. There is no such right in any manner to incite people to riot.

No, that's not true at all.

They only try to silence one side of things, everybody else gets to rock out with their cock out.

 

[22lcidw]

And the naïve will deny that "they" will ever be shut up/off, because they will claim that they think like Zuckerberg. What they don't realize is that Zuckerberg is taking his cues from China's CCP.

Think of Christians as the seeds to the next generation with higher production for work morals and Gays as a dead end to our culture. That is the truth. All can coexist with give and take. But with a straight line of demarcation it can not.

 

[pknopp]

These venue's have long cut people off inciting people to riot. There is no such right in any manner to incite people to riot.

Who are you saying is calling for riots. It sure isn't Trump or those who follow him. When we say fight it is with Spirit.

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."

And then call people names on Twitter.

 

[pknopp]

These venue's have long cut people off inciting people to riot. There is no such right in any manner to incite people to riot.

No, that's not true at all.

They only try to silence one side of things, everybody else gets to rock out with their cock out.

That MIGHT be true but it doesn't dispute what I said.

If you see hypocrisy condemn it but you cant argue that inciting people to riot is free speech.

 

[MarathonMike]

She will be forced to repent by the Liberal elites. No parties for you! You'll never work in this town again!

 

[Dogbiscuit]

Another reason why I donated to USMB just minutes ago.

 

[RodISHI]

These venue's have long cut people off inciting people to riot. There is no such right in any manner to incite people to riot.

Who are you saying is calling for riots. It sure isn't Trump or those who follow him. When we say fight it is with Spirit.

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."

And then call people names on Twitter.

So you think people should be banned if they think you are a dumb ass?

 

[RodISHI]

She will be forced to repent by the Liberal elites. No parties for you! You'll never work in this town again!

Better looksee and find all that China owns there in Hollyweird now.

 

[White 6]

These venue's have long cut people off inciting people to riot. There is no such right in any manner to incite people to riot.

Who are you saying is calling for riots. It sure isn't Trump or those who follow him. When we say fight it is with Spirit.

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."

They went the flesh and blood route on Wednesday the 6th.