Alleged active duty female soldier in uniform blasts trump at anti ICE protest in Dallas

[M14 Shooter]

If she is active duty military she’s toast

Yep. Bad news for her.

 

[Godboy]

She's not military. She's a civilian.

I.e. a veteran.

WW

You have zero proof for that claim.

 

[Godboy]

The indication is in the article in the OP.

Hell the preview in the OP shows "ex-soldier".

WW

"Ex soldier"? I saw no such quote. Ive seen no credible proof that she isnt active military.

 

[WorldWatcher]

You have zero proof for that claim.

"SHRUG"

It's the basis of the discussion and was in the article in the OP.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

"Ex soldier"? I saw no such quote. Ive seen no credible proof that she isnt active military.

I said: "Hell the preview in the OP shows "ex-soldier".

Here is the picture.

WW

 

[M14 Shooter]

"A uniformed U.S. Army veteran has provoked anger among MAGA conservatives by joining a protest against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Dallas, Texas, on Monday."

Apparently, the fact she was wearing something resembling a uniform was fit to print?

Outside of that:
"Veteran complains about a deployment which does not relate to her"

 

[Godboy]

View attachment 1122122

I said: "Hell the preview in the OP shows "ex-soldier".

Here is the picture.

WW

I read the article and they are very clear that they dont know her current status.

Regardless, you cant wear the uniform if you arent active anymore, except for certain limited situations. Wearing it at a protest is strickly forbidden.



Restrictions:

There are limitations on wearing the uniform in certain situations, such as during public speeches, interviews, picket lines, marches, or other public demonstrations that could imply service sanction of the cause. Additionally, wearing the uniform is restricted when it could bring discredit upon the Armed Forces.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

You're clueless. There's no free speech if she is active.

Read the article, she is a veteran.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

The problem is defining "free speech". Where does responsibility end and nastiness and destruction of others begin. Where do we define threats. Real threats. Not mouthing off. There are people who are not very good. And they may be revered by others.

Trump says some of the most vile and nasty ish and you cowards applaud , this woman has a right to her damn opinion just like any other citizen does.

 

[Scoutster]

An attention whore.

 

[WorldWatcher]

I read the article and they are very clear that they dont know her current status.

Regardless, you cant wear the uniform if you arent active anymore, except for certain limited situations. Wearing it at a protest is strickly forbidden.



Restrictions:

There are limitations on wearing the uniform in certain situations, such as during public speeches, interviews, picket lines, marches, or other public demonstrations that could imply service sanction of the cause. Additionally, wearing the uniform is restricted when it could bring discredit upon the Armed Forces.

Instead of posting some kind of Chat AI response. Those restrictions come from DoD Instruction 1334.01. Guess what? DOD Instructions don't apply to civilians.

How about posting the law that makes it a criminal offense for a civilian to wear military clothing.

Start with the two laws I posted earlier.

WW

 

[Godboy]

Read the article, she is a veteran.

The articke says that they arent sure what her status is. Regardless, veterans cant put on the uniform and go to a protest, let alone make comments of a political nature on live tv.

 

[Godboy]

Instead of posting some kind of Chat AI response.

How about posting the law that makes it a criminal offense for a civilian to wear military clothing.

Start with the two laws I posted earlier.

WW

I dont know the ******* law. I just know as an ex military member myself, you cant go to protests in uniform, nor can you wear the uniform when you arent active anymore, unless its for a ceremony of some kind, like a wedding or funeral.

 

[WorldWatcher]

The articke says that they arent sure what her status is. Regardless, veterans cant put on the uniform and go to a protest, let alone make comments of a political nature on live tv.

Veterans of have completed MOS (minimum obligated service) and are no longer subject to the UCMJ sure can wear military clothing.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

I dont know the ******* law.

Thank you for admitting that.

I just know as an ex military member myself, you cant go to protest in uniform, nor can you wear the uniform when you arent active anymore, unless its for a ceremony of some kind.

That is incorrect. The restrictions only apply if you are subject to DOD rules and regulations, if you are, then you are still subject to certain aspects of the UCMJ. However once all obligated service requirements have ended, those restrictions don't apply.

WW
ATC(AW/NAC)
US Navy, Ret.

 

[Godboy]

Veterans of have completed MOS (minimum obligated service) and are no longer subject to the UCMJ sure can wear military clothing.

WW

No they cant. You are uninformed. I literally just posted the rule, and i dont give a shit that you dont like Google AI's answer. Google is correct.

 

[Godboy]

Thank you for admitting that.



That is incorrect. The restrictions only apply if you are subject to DOD rules and regulations, if you are, then you are still subject to certain aspects of the UCMJ. However once all obligated service requirements have ended, those restrictions don't apply.

WW
ATC(AW/NAC)
US Navy, Ret.

Youre a ******* idiot. YOU dont know that law code either. Only a military lawyer would know that offhand.

You CANNOT wear a uniform at a protest, whether youre active or innactive military.

 

[WorldWatcher]

No they cant. You are uninformed.

Of the two of use I'm the one that is informed.

I literally just posted the rule,

No you didn't. You posted an AI response to a Google search.

and i dont give a shit that you dont like Google AI's answer. Google is correct.

10 U.S. Code § 772 - When wearing by persons not on active duty authorized

www.law.cornell.edu

Here is the actual United States Code. Review the law and tell us where it says anything about it being a criminal offense for civilians. What the law DOES do is provide the structure that the DOD can use in devising it's DOD instructions.

I'll take the United States Code over your AI Google search any day.

WW

 

[Mac-7]

YOu need to explain that to tRump, not me. He's the one who replaced all the generals and such with his political appointees.

Obama did the same thing

You have it backwards

The generals should non political but trump does not

 

[WorldWatcher]

Youre a ******* idiot. YOU dont know that law code either.

I just quoted the law and gave you the DOD instruction number.

Only a military lawyer would know that offhand.

Funny I'm not a JAG (although my daughter is) and could find it very quickly.

You CANNOT wear a uniform at a protest, active or innactive.

See that's the point you seem to not get. Apparently she is neither "active" (i.e. Active Duty) or "inactive" (subject to DOD instructions as some type of reserve status).

If she is a a civilian (not active duty and not a member of a reserve component), there is no criminal violation for her wearing military clothing as a veteran.

See as a military retiree, I served for 20 years active duty. Then transferred to the Fleet Reserve for 10 years until I reached 30 years total (active & reserve). As a retiree I'm still subject to the UCMJ for certain things. However the woman in the OP isn't in that situation, if she is no longer tied to the military in either an active or some form of reserve status - then she is a civilian. And it is not illegal for civilians to wear military clothing.

WW