Alleged active duty female soldier in uniform blasts trump at anti ICE protest in Dallas

[Paddlefoot]

Well, it is at a immigration protest so just saying you are a lesbian likely won't get the attention of the press.

 

[Moonglow]

The commander in chief is exempt from that

Why have an impeachment if the president has exemptions to everything they do?

 

[Moonglow]

Well, it is at a immigration protest so just saying you are a lesbian likely won't get the attention of the press.

Do lesbians wear signs extolling their sexual preference?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

She might find a new career as a housekeeper.

.

Scrubbing hotel toilets for less than minimum wage.


.

 

[Paddlefoot]

I saw videos of the Austin protest. I can agree on letting them have their march as they really need to do some exercise to lose weight.

 

[debbiedowner]

They don’t even read their own shit

I know but at least mudwhistle had the correct info in the thread he started in Military.

 

[Concerned American]

The OP article clearly says she is an ex-soldier.

WW

If she is serving the "inactive" portion of her enlistment, she is still bound to support the commander in chief. There is not enough info in the article to determine either way.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Freedom of speech, do you think it is not for soldiers?

It's well established that while members of the Armed Forces retain the right of free speech, that speech can be limited in terms of military and political matters.

But she is not active duty (per the OP article), so it's not really relevant.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

.

In uniform.




.

So?

It's not criminal for a veteran to wear a uniform.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

If she is serving the "inactive" portion of her enlistment, she is still bound to support the commander in chief. There is not enough info in the article to determine either way.

If she is inactive she is NOT bound to support the Commander In Chief.

He speech AGAINT the CIC can be limited if she is subject to the UCMJ, but limiting public criticism in uniform does not mean they are required to support.

WW

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

So?

It's not criminal for a veteran to wear a uniform.

WW

.


Maybe not in your unicorn land.




.

 

[WorldWatcher]

.


Maybe not in your unicorn land.




.

So what law makes the wearing of military uniforms by civilians criminal?

I've posted the laws prior in the thread. See post #42.

WW

 

[Concerned American]

If she is inactive she is NOT bound to support the Commander In Chief.

He speech AGAINT the CIC can be limited if she is subject to the UCMJ, but limiting public criticism in uniform does not mean they are required to support.

WW

Inactive reserve military are still bound by the terms of their contract. You are sorely mistaken.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Inactive reserve military are still bound by the terms of their contract. You are sorely mistaken.

There has been no indication she has any reserve component remaining.

However, if you go back to post #25, you will see how I already pointed out that reservists can for something still be subject to the UCMJ.

So not, I'm not mistaken.

WW

 

[Godboy]

YOu kids hate free speech so much...

Military personell dont have "free speech" rights.

 

[Concerned American]

There has been no indication she has any reserve component remaining.

Read my post and dump the contrary act. I stated that in my post.

 

[konradv]

She may not be on active duty now

A “former intelligence analyst?”

What is she now?

A loyal American calling out fascists.

 

[Godboy]

Read my post and dump the contrary act. I stated that in my post.

Furthermore, there is no indication that she isnt currently ACTIVE military. If i see someone in full uniform, i assume they are absolutely active.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Military personell dont have "free speech" rights.

She's not military. She's a civilian.

I.e. a veteran.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

Furthermore, there is no indication that she isnt currently ACTIVE military. If i see someone in full uniform, i assume they are absolutely active.

The indication is in the article in the OP.

Hell the preview in the OP shows "ex-soldier".

WW